Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Envy!!!!!!!!!! LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL.

Dont worry Hays the redistribution of income will affect YOU so dont worry about being left out.

The average Dutch household could be better off by over £8,000 a year and national income will grow by over £1 trillion if the Netherlands leaves the euro and the EU, according to a new study.


The study by the respected British Capital Economics research consultancy into "Nexit" finds significant benefits over the next two decades to 2035 for the Netherlands in leaving the EU and negotiating a similar status as Switzerland.

ever one in the uk would be over 17k better off . the EU as destroyed the uk people

gf
Luckily, you are wrong there.

Dont you worry , we'l get you Hays.

You can run but you cant hide.

Wake me up when summer arrives. Zzzzzzz

Newsflash: Dutch would be better off if they had freedom to set their own economic policy

By Janet Daley World Last updated: February 6th, 2014

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/janetdaley/100258448/newsflash-dutch-would-be-better-off-if-they-had-freedom-to-set-their-own-economic-policy/


Well, fancy that. A study by Capital Economics (an organisation which won the Wolfson Prize, no less, in 2012), has concluded that the average Dutch household could be £8000 per year better off, and that the national income would grow if Netherlands left the EU. That's the political headline. But even more worthy of attention is the apparent banality of the report's basis for this assertion.

"…there are also good reasons to believe that a nation, untied from the bureaucracy of Brussels and able to make decisions for itself rather than have imposed one-size-fits-all policies will benefit economically…" You don't say. In fact, isn't that what you and I (and lots and lots of other people) have been saying ever since the inception of the single currency? Indeed, how could anyone in his right mind have thought that tying all the wildly differing states of the European Union, with their vastly disparate economic histories and cultural attitudes to taxation, debt, public spending, etc, etc, was a good – or even a remotely feasible – idea? How could locking them all into the same interest rate and monetary policy as the most successful and productive member (Germany) not result in the pauperisation of the southern Mediterranean countries? And how could those poorer countries possibly avoid permanent dependency on the richer ones? Without even the possibility of devaluation or lower interest rates, how could they ever emerge from their endemic poverty? And so on and on.

Yes sir, those are the questions we all asked at the time and answer came there none. And now the august Capital Economics report states portentously that the country would be able to manage its economy more successfully, "…by having the freedom to set monetary and fiscal policy to fit Dutch national conditions, and not the euro-zone as a whole." You bet.

I have always thought that politics and come to that politicians should not be involved with disputes over strikes....I know it's difficult to separate the two but it is between the management and the workforce to come to an agreement over pay and conditions....that should happen if both parties agree within reason to sit down and talk things over....it is irritating to see politics becoming the main issue !.....I feel sorry for commuters...passengers and such....and I'm pretty certain that the tube staff can't be too happy as well by striking....let's hope this dispute is quickly sorted out without the main parties sticking their noses in !...

Trebles all round for the lawyers!



Bill Roache found not guilty of rape and assault charges

81-year-old William Roache, who plays Ken Barlow in the ITV soap, is cleared of all charges of sexually abusing five youngsters following a trial at Preston Crown Court




The jury spent just under six hours deliberating before delivering its unanimous not guilty verdicts.




http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10621400/Bill-Roache-found-not-guilty-of-rape-and-assault-charges.html

Why don't they put the Police and others on trial for covering up what they knew about Jimmy Saville and other case's ?

These men like Bill Roach are mostly in their 70 to 80's , the stress they are put under could kill them , like what as been said before some of these cases should never have come to court on just so flimsey heresay , maybe they should look into the background of these accusers a great deal more

The extent of corruption in Europe is "breathtaking" and it costs the EU economy at least 120bn euros (£99bn) annually, the European Commission says.

EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmstroem has presented a full report on the problem.

She said the true cost of corruption was "probably much higher" than 120bn.

Were is everybody today ?

Hello :-)

Lord Smith, Chairman of the Environment Agency and who is on a nice big fat salary managed to borrow some wellies at last and visit Somerset today;


Ahead of Lord Smith's visit, Conservative Mr Liddell-Grainger, who represents Bridgwater and West Somerset, said: "I will tell him what I bloody well think of him - he should go, he should walk.

"I'm livid. This little git has never even been on the telephone to me. When I find out where he is, I will give it to him.

"He has not told the local MPs, the local council or the local press where he is going to be. He's a coward."

He had the wellies last time. They were in the boot of his car. There is a lot of land flooded, but just 40 houses. It is just the farmers making a fuss. The rivers haven't been dredged since 1995 as expert opinion was that it was not needed. It is difficult to protect the area, which is below sea level, from such an abnormal storm. The cost to protect such a small number of properties is out of proportion.

Do you think it's out of proportion to spending about £50billion on the HS2 project Haystack? I think if your house was 1 of the 40 you might be a little upset. "Just the farmers making a fuss" - don't you value the contribution farmers make to the country?

I hear Captain Bluster LE after his morning bluster is putting on his Wellies and going to hide from Corporal Alex SNP in Somerset.

Ducking and weaving to avoid a confrontation with the Haggis, but serving up a little Darling instead of him.

As usual Wavey Davey is all mouth and no trousers.

==========

What are they doing farming below sea level? I would let it flood and then fix the problem when better weather comes. There is just a handful of farms there. It looks bad due to the size of the fields.

“Retreat is the only sensible policy,” says Colin Thorne, professor of physical geography at Nottingham University and a leading flood expert. “If we fight nature, we will lose in the end.”

This view has until now strongly influenced government policy on the Levels. Much stress has been placed on the area’s role as a flood plain where people should expect to get wet. The perhaps brutal calculation has been that it was not worth spending millions dredging rivers and building barriers to protect a few thousand people – especially when the scientists say that it will merely buy time.

“Can the Somerset Levels be defended between now and the end of the century? No,” says Prof Thorne.

No explicit decision would be taken to abandon the Levels. But the much-hated end to the dredging of the area’s rivers, and the increased flooding that may have resulted, were at least pushing in that direction and letting nature, in at least some places, gradually take its course.

There are, however, a few problems for the “swampist tendency,” as Anthony Gibson, a former farmer’s union official now closely involved with efforts to plan for the area, calls them. The first, as he says, is that “the Levels are very far from a typical flood plain”.

They are a deeply artificial, man-made environment, criss-crossed with rivers, canals and channels whose banks have been built up higher than the surrounding land to carry large volumes of water through and out of the area.

Because of these banks, the water level in the two main local rivers, the Parrett and the Tone, is up to 10ft higher than the land around it. In flood times, when the rivers burst even these banks, floodwater cannot escape until the level of water in the river is lower than the level on the land around it, and that can take months

How many tory mp's in that area?