goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
MaxK
- 07 Feb 2014 18:24
- 36277 of 81564
How many tory mp's in that area?
Fred1new
- 07 Feb 2014 18:27
- 36278 of 81564
Not enough to get Cameron out of bed until the flood started hitting his doorstops.
doodlebug4
- 07 Feb 2014 18:32
- 36279 of 81564
The whole scenario with Lord Smith makes me angry and I don't even live in Somerset. What on earth does he think he's getting paid for, to sit in a car trying to avoid the press, dodge awkward questions and then scurry back to his lovely warm home as soon as possible? If he doesn't think the buck stops with him, then he should stop getting paid big bucks.
MaxK
- 07 Feb 2014 18:32
- 36280 of 81564
David Cameron promises to help flood victims on visit to Somerset
Prime minister says he will do 'everything that can be done' as he meets locals in flooded county
Patrick Wintour
theguardian.com, Friday 7 February 2014 17.33 GMT
The prime minister, under growing pressure for not visiting the flood-hit Somerset levels, finally made a trip to the area on Friday where he vowed to do everything he could to help.
On his visit in the company of the local Bridgwater Conservative MP, Ian Liddell-Grainger, David Cameron said: "Clearly people here faced a very tough time and continue to face a tough time, and that is why we have got to do everything we can to help.
"So more pumps – we brought in more pumps; more help from the emergency services – more help is there; money to help Somerset to get back on its feet – the money is there; the army coming in to help with sandbags, as they have other the past 24 hours."
He suggested the cause of the problems lay with decisions taken by the last Labour government. "The pause in dredging that took place in the late 90s – that was wrong. We need to get dredging again and I have said when the water levels come down and it is safe to dredge we will be dredging to make sure that these rivers and ditches can carry a better capacity of water. There are lessons to be learned and I will make sure they are learned.
"Some dredging was done but clearly we need to go back to a period of much more intensive dredging. It is not the whole answer. Right now the priority is that anyone in Somerset who needs help gets help."
Full story:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/feb/07/david-cameron-help-flood-victims-somerset-farm
Haystack
- 07 Feb 2014 19:11
- 36281 of 81564
It just stupid politics. Who wants to spend millions to protect a handful of farms. Let them drown as they will eventually. If climate change is a reality then they will be under water soon no matter what is done. There may be climate change, but it may just be a natural cycle and not man made.
It certainly true that it was Labour that stopped the dredging.
cynic
- 07 Feb 2014 20:14
- 36282 of 81564
an interesting question today was whether or not part of the £11bn overseas aid should be diverted to pressing home flood relief requirements - and not just a paltry £100m earmarked for 2015
doodlebug4
- 07 Feb 2014 20:29
- 36283 of 81564
Haystack - I think that is an appalling comment, it smacks of 'I'm alright Jack'---------
"Who wants to spend millions to protect a handful of farms. Let them drown as they will eventually."
Haystack
- 07 Feb 2014 21:06
- 36284 of 81564
It is just being realistic and about value for money. There has to be that calculation. How would it be if there was just one farm and it cost say £100m to save it? That would be easy to decide. It wouldn't happen. So at what point do you save a handful of farms? Do you spend £1m, £10m, £50m or £100m? This is then compounded by the possibility that there is a worsening weather pattern so that the price might rise and the end result might be failure. Someone has to make that decision based on the cost and the longterm viability.
MaxK
- 07 Feb 2014 21:33
- 36285 of 81564
ok, on that basis, you can get rid of Scotlands hill farms as well.
Just try it and see what happens.
doodlebug4
- 07 Feb 2014 21:37
- 36286 of 81564
Blimey, I must be getting soft in my old age - okay, just let them drown then. Let's just go ahead and spend £50billion on HS2 and by the time that's finished the whole country may be completely under water.
Haystack
- 07 Feb 2014 21:45
- 36287 of 81564
Scottish and even Welsh hill farms are not in danger of being flooded or other physical problems. They are just unprofitable. They can be sustained at a reasonable cost. If it was not so, they would have already gone. Many traditions die out and that is just the way of things. Do we want to preserve farming with horse drawn ploughs on all farms.
MaxK
- 07 Feb 2014 23:09
- 36288 of 81564
Are you serious?
Abandon huge areas of the southern UK cos you cant be bothered to protect the land?
Import even more fruit and vegetables cos it's cheaper in the short term?
Find the money to blow on a train set that cuts the travelling time by 20 minutes from London to mancland
Are you mad, have you lost all reason?
Haystack
- 07 Feb 2014 23:18
- 36289 of 81564
It isn't a huge area and doesn't produce much. The area will just return to salt marshes and be a bird sanctuary. It is doomed as farm land.
MaxK
- 07 Feb 2014 23:30
- 36290 of 81564
re: #36291
One of the reasons that the tory party are doomed, quite simply, is the leaders are mad, and have lost all touch with the people...Noo Labour are going the same way, the loony libs are beyond belief!
Whats left?
tyketto
- 08 Feb 2014 00:54
- 36291 of 81564
UKIP seem to be right.
(when they rewrite their manifesto)
Haystack
- 08 Feb 2014 01:20
- 36292 of 81564
They would need policies first.
MaxK
- 08 Feb 2014 08:18
- 36293 of 81564
goldfinger
- 08 Feb 2014 08:37
- 36294 of 81564
Camoron blaming labour YET AGAIN.
Hasnt he yet realised hes been in power for 4 years.
Its a disgrace a total disgrace, them poor people in that Somerset area.
And YOU Hays are wrong, its not a case of looking at costs, were talking of peoples lives here.......human beings.
How would you like to be tossed out of your home and relocated somewhere else.
Get real.
cynic
- 08 Feb 2014 09:52
- 36295 of 81564
a few of non-political questions .....
for how long has the Environment Agency been in existence?
for how long has the present head of the agency been in place?
what has been the agency's policy on say dredging for say the last 7/10 years?
has there been any fundamental changes in policy over that period?
then of course there are other aspects, especially with regard to building on known flood plain ..... the Environment Agency has little or no say in the granting of such approvals
Haystack
- 08 Feb 2014 10:44
- 36296 of 81564
They stopped dredging in the late 1990s.