Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

tyketto - 08 Feb 2014 00:54 - 36291 of 81564

UKIP seem to be right.
(when they rewrite their manifesto)

Haystack - 08 Feb 2014 01:20 - 36292 of 81564

They would need policies first.

MaxK - 08 Feb 2014 08:18 - 36293 of 81564

goldfinger - 08 Feb 2014 08:37 - 36294 of 81564

Camoron blaming labour YET AGAIN.

Hasnt he yet realised hes been in power for 4 years.

Its a disgrace a total disgrace, them poor people in that Somerset area.

And YOU Hays are wrong, its not a case of looking at costs, were talking of peoples lives here.......human beings.

How would you like to be tossed out of your home and relocated somewhere else.

Get real.

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 09:52 - 36295 of 81564

a few of non-political questions .....
for how long has the Environment Agency been in existence?
for how long has the present head of the agency been in place?
what has been the agency's policy on say dredging for say the last 7/10 years?
has there been any fundamental changes in policy over that period?

then of course there are other aspects, especially with regard to building on known flood plain ..... the Environment Agency has little or no say in the granting of such approvals

Haystack - 08 Feb 2014 10:44 - 36296 of 81564

They stopped dredging in the late 1990s.

required field - 08 Feb 2014 11:02 - 36297 of 81564

To be fair the environment agency can help, but only up to a certain extent depending on quite a few things : first of all : is there money in the kitty ?...is it possible to keep the Somerset levels free of flooding ?....how long would it take to organise a plan ?.....how fast can emergency repairs be put into place....not easy questions to be answered in a few minutes....!..
Seas are rising....icecaps are melting.....in fact I remember glaciers in the Alps as a child being much larger,.. longer,.. bigger than they are today....this melting and flooding and extreme weather is a global trend : the South of france is having record levels of rainfall with terrible flooding !....they are not prepared either...
I don't agree with just giving up land to the seas or retreating as they call it.. if it can be saved within reason...but a plan needs to be put in place for the next hundred years on what can or shall be done because the costs are astronomical !..
Reclaiming land from the wash in East Anglia is a big possibility and at the same time would protect the fens from total flooding and destruction....the bird sanctuaries would be saved ...the seal colonies as well ..and could be recreated on the other side of the dam as well as a massive new floodfree area created with new towns...farmland...thouands of new square miles recaptured from the sea....probably creating half a million new jobs..perhaps more....big project over several decades....the Dutch do and have protected their shoreline with huge infrastructure building projects like this...why don't we do the same ?...

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 11:35 - 36298 of 81564

to remain above water, the dutch have had zero option for centuries as the land itself has always been intrinsically below sea level ......
this is not the case in somerset (i think) and the drainage of the fens was done centuries ago and, i believe, not without considerable downside though not sure what

the dutch have had plenty of their own disasters too, no doubt with more to follow in the decades ahead if they are unlucky

required field - 08 Feb 2014 11:54 - 36299 of 81564

They are experts in protecting land from flooding....you have to say...this flooding is not going to go away...it's going to get worse...

doodlebug4 - 08 Feb 2014 11:59 - 36300 of 81564

required field - good post apart from the, "is there money in the kitty?" bit.There seemed to be £billions available when this country got involved in the Iraq debacle. I wonder how much was spent on bombing Bagdad to rubble and then trying to rebuild.

MaxK - 08 Feb 2014 12:20 - 36301 of 81564

There's always money for wars!

I wonder if there is any money in the kitty for the insurance claims? Cos the insurance industry will be looking to blame someone for their losses.

What about the knock on problems of people with in effect uninsurable, and therefor unsellable/unmortgageable property?

And just wait till the legal eagles get involved.


it's going to make the 3-4 million £'s cost of dredging the waterways look cheap.

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 12:23 - 36302 of 81564

was this flooding foreseeable?
not really, i would venture, and thus effective pre-emptive work was not really a feasibility - it would have had to have been proposed, discussed and put in place at least a decade ago
as an analogy, for how long has HS2 or building new runways been under discussion?

on the other hand, Lord Whatnot's pathetic reaction to the situation is despicable at best

Fred1new - 08 Feb 2014 12:28 - 36303 of 81564

"David Cameron overrules Environment Secretary Owen Paterson to order urgent dredging in Somerset to combat the flooding"

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 12:31 - 36304 of 81564

attribution please, and what is the rest of the story that assuredly attaches?

MaxK - 08 Feb 2014 12:54 - 36305 of 81564

was this flooding foreseeable?


Of course it was, that's why they have been dredging the waterways for donkeys years.

doodlebug4 - 08 Feb 2014 13:04 - 36306 of 81564

I live in Hampshire and the local council stopped cleaning out the drains at the sides of the roads years ago, so every Autumn when the leaves fall off the trees the drains get totally blocked up - every time we have heavy rain the roads become flooded. It's not exactly rocket science is it.

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 13:05 - 36307 of 81564

is that true?
while that used to be the case when i was a child - i was brought up on the Thames near Henley - i don't recollect any dredging for many many years
certainly there are also disadvantages in so-doing, the effects on the eco-system being secondary, as for obvious reasons it can and even will completely change flow patterns ..... thus, if water is flowing more swiftly - an obvious effect of dredging - then, apart from anything else, bank erosion will increase significantly .... so now you've created new and different problems

cynic - 08 Feb 2014 13:07 - 36308 of 81564

DD - building on flood plain is a spiffing idea too! .... not only will those houses be probne to flooding anyway, but of course there is then no "waste" area for excess water to go, whether from the river or run-off from the land side

required field - 08 Feb 2014 17:31 - 36309 of 81564

Insurance costs are going to escalate that's for sure....and those that have had their homes flooded will never be able to get a quote again...

MaxK - 08 Feb 2014 17:41 - 36310 of 81564

Minister resigns shock horror!




Immigration minister resigns for employing illegal immigrant

Prime minister accepts resignation of Mark Harper, who launched government's 'go home' campaign last year


theguardian.com, Saturday 8 February 2014 16.20 GMT



http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/08/immigration-minister-resigns-illegal-immigrant-mark-harper
Register now or login to post to this thread.