peteark
- 24 May 2005 13:03
.
thirdtime
- 27 May 2005 12:39
- 367 of 1643
Calidor = Muffy?
britshare
- 27 May 2005 12:39
- 368 of 1643
Calidor = Mufmitz
REDHILL
- 27 May 2005 12:40
- 369 of 1643
peteark
I'm not so sure that the 1 million was a sell.Anyway its gone now and included in the price.
Level 2 now showing 4v4 4.4p-4.8p
RED
Calidor
- 27 May 2005 12:44
- 370 of 1643
Calidor will now cease posting to this board. It seems to be going the idiot route.
Golfnut
- 27 May 2005 12:45
- 371 of 1643
Thank goodness for that !!
peteark
- 27 May 2005 12:54
- 372 of 1643
Unfortunatly muff, Chris's words to you about calming down fell on absolutly deaf ears, you will now be added to the list in the header. You like him shall cease to exist on this thread.
peteark
- 27 May 2005 12:59
- 373 of 1643
Could everyone do me the favour of adding calidor to their 'squelch' list, it will make reading this thread more enjoyable. If you can also refrain from mentioning his name this will also make the thread a better place to communicate on things other than the Terretorial Army.
TY
peteark
- 27 May 2005 13:00
- 374 of 1643
I wonder if Chris was wise to concede his bet to insider.
2LB
- 27 May 2005 13:20
- 375 of 1643
4.55 on the bid.
Trades coming through at 4.80
peteark
- 27 May 2005 13:47
- 376 of 1643
people on my mailing list......uhm
shareguevara
- 27 May 2005 13:56
- 377 of 1643
.
peteark
- 27 May 2005 14:05
- 378 of 1643
shar did you notice the new addition to the squelch list?
sms720
- 27 May 2005 14:06
- 379 of 1643
pete - Am I not on your mailing list anymore - (sms720.com or the gmail account I gave you?) as I haven't received anything...
Cheers
Si
peteark
- 27 May 2005 14:09
- 380 of 1643
Si you have been temp removed, along with a few other people......the whole list will be reviewed again as soon as we get some time.
sms720
- 27 May 2005 14:16
- 381 of 1643
Can I ask why I have been removed?
Si
shareguevara
- 27 May 2005 14:18
- 382 of 1643
Haven't found the need yet Pete. I don't want to be too quick to judge new names. If I feel they're winding me up I will use it, I don't want to fall into the trap of just filtering out any negative sentiment just in case someone comes up with something worth thinking about. Lol, unlikely I know ;-)
See we're having a little pullback. No great surprise, MMs have probably pushed it up a bit too quick today on unspectacular volumes.
peteark
- 27 May 2005 14:26
- 383 of 1643
Si
It is all about verification, there are others we will sort it out properly next week.
peteark
- 27 May 2005 14:33
- 384 of 1643
Shar this thread is intended to be totally for share talk not muff slagging people off because their grammer is not up to his standard, or people do not understand TA. This thread will not turn into a mirror image of the other one, and if people do not want to abide to the one rule of the thread, I will close this one and stop using BB's entirely. No one is bearish about this share more than insider, and he is welcome to post anything. Calidor's intention is purely(thanks Red) to annoy, we had enough of that with the other nutcase.
You are right people have a choice, so do I.
REDHILL
- 27 May 2005 14:43
- 385 of 1643
You leave Purley out of this.Its just down the road!!!!
RED
shareguevara
- 27 May 2005 14:44
- 386 of 1643
No probs pete, I have no intention of replying so let's stick to discussing EVS.