overgrowth
- 13 May 2005 16:36
Retail Decisions are
market leaders in an industry which continues to grow exponentially. They
produce payment fraud systems solutions for major blue chip clients globally,
though the bulk of the business is currently coming from the major reatilers
both in the UK and US.
They are a Techmark 100 company which means that there will always be
a level of institutional interest in the company. However, on top of this
"forced" interest from the tracker funds there has throughout
2005 been sustained large buying from no other than Goldman Sachs and
Barclays. These institutions together now have an investment of tens of
millions of shares in RTD !
|
|
Shares Magazine had
a cover feature back in early April entitled "ATOMIC! - Small is
about to get VERY, VERY BIG - 7 stocks for the new technology revolution".
It was no surprise to see Retail Decisions as part of the selection.
Here's what Shares
had to say:
"Retail Decisions is a specialist software developer aimed at preventing
credit card fraud. It owns a database of several million dodgy credit
and debit card numbers against which it crosschecks transactions, but
also has developed clever software which can spot strange patterns in
your spending. This system is perfect for stopping phony credit card transactions.
Investors could not ask for a better pure play on rising credit card crime.
Perhaps the company's biggest challenge is scale but chief exec Carl Clump
is attempting to address this with aquisitions, even if opportunities
seem to be few and far between. In the meantime, Retail Decisions remains
concentrated on developing in the card-not-present arena, where it already
has fantastic experience and technology.
The drive to win new customers should also be helped by the fact that
it already serves so many blue-chip customers including Marks & Spencer,
T-Mobile and, most recently, Federated Department Stores, the US owner
of Macy's and Bloomingdales.
Let's not forget, too, the company's highly profitable fuel-card business
in Australia which grew 30% last year, making this year's forecast low
single-digit earnings growth look on the conservative side."
Retail Decisions have
continued throughout 2005 to rake in very healthy profits from the Oz.
fuel card business thanks to the "bonus" of high oil prices
and favourable exchange rates. In addition, the extra revenue streams
from new major US corporate clients will be starting to filter through.
In the US, Retail Decisions appear to be chosen on many occasions over
their main rival Cybersource which indicates just how well this company
is doing.
The demand for card-not-present (i.e. internet/phone shopping) fraud software
is going to continue to grow and grow so RTD presents guaranteed success
in this arena - backed up with the cash cow fuel card business which is
being extended into locations other than Australia and we have a real
gem of a company. Longer term target 1+.
|

Fundamentalist
- 12 Oct 2005 11:36
- 378 of 1009
My opinions fwiw:
Appears to be a direction change in the business away from the (supposed) high margin high growth business of CNP and towards the lower margin, cash cow fuel card business.
Fuelserve has net assets of 11.7m and last year had turnover of 140.2m and operating profit of 3.8m. However, this operating profit included an exceptional credit of 0.4m and IT costs were not charged ot the business representing 0.6m so underlying operating profit was 2.8m. Against this there is going to be some additional UK overheads before you get to a PBT level. Therefore this appears a very low margin business though this appears in line with other UK fuel card businesses. It will be earnings enhancing in 2006.
I like the share consolidation, should be approx 80m shares at approx 115p afterwards and via the placing, there is now a stronger institutional sharebase.
My main disappointment is that the apparent change in strategy is likely to see the company valued on a lower PE (due to lower long term organic growth potential). The big question is to whether RTD can increase the margins in the new business using their expertise as a small % increase in margin on 140m turnover will have a dramatic effect on profit
Fundamentalist
- 13 Oct 2005 15:06
- 379 of 1009
Retail Decisions PLC
13 October 2005
NOTIFICATION OF MAJOR INTERESTS IN SHARES
All relevant boxes should be completed in block capital letters
1. Name of listed company
RETAIL DECISIONS PLC
2. Name of shareholder with a major interest
BARCLAYS PLC
3. Please state whether notification indicates that it is regarding the holding
of the shareholder named in 2 above; in respect of a non-beneficial interest; or
in the case of an individual holder if it is a holding of that person's spouse
or children under the age of 18
LEGAL ENTITY INTEREST
BARCLAYS LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD 3,041,261
BARCLAYS GLOBAL INVESTORS LTD 6,550,740
BARCLAYS CAPITAL SECURITIES LTD 2,559,023
GERRARD LTD 205,494
4. Name of the registered holder(s) and, if more than one holder, the number of
shares held by each of them
REGISTERED HOLDER A/C HOLDING
BARCLAYS CAPITAL NOMINEES LTD 2,559,023
CHASE NOMINEES LTD 16376 173,105
CHASE NOMINEES LTD 21359 2,279,895
CHASE NOMINEES LTD 28270 147,569
CHASE NOMINEES LTD 28270 527,402
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16341 173,726
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16341 1,201,738
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16344 372,815
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16345 618,011
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16400 2,552,901
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 16482 1,364,273
JP MORGAN (BGI CUSTODY) 18409 180,566
R C GREIG NOMINEES LTD RC1 147,767
R C GREIG NOMINEES LTD AK1 44,400
R C GREIG NOMINEES LTD GP1 10,000
R C GREIG NOMINEES LTD SA1 3,327
5. Number of shares / amount of stock acquired
NOT INFORMED
6. Percentage of issued class (any treasury shares held by the listed company
should not be taken into account when calculating percentage)
NOT INFORMED
7. Number of shares / amount of stock disposed
NOT INFORMED
8. Percentage of issued class (any treasury shares held by the company should
not be taken into account when calculating percentage)
NOT INFORMED
9. Class of security
ORDINARY 1P SHARES
10. Date of transaction
NOT INFORMED
11. Date listed company informed
12 OCTOBER 2005
12. Total holding following this notification
12,356,518
13. Total percentage holding of issued class following this notification (any
treasury shares held by the company should not be taken into account when
calculating percentage)
4.24%
14. Any additional information
N/A
15. Name of contact and telephone number for queries
KEVIN HAYES
(01483) 728700
16. Name and signature of duly authorised officer of the listed company
responsible for making this notification
KEVIN HAYES
COMPANY SECRETARY
Date of notification
Looks like Barclays have sold approx 22m shares - before or after the bad news? and who bought them?
13 OCTOBER 2005
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
Fred1new
- 14 Oct 2005 09:59
- 380 of 1009
Fundy, What I would like to know is when did BARclays sell their stock?
Was it just before the price rolled down?
Was it early September or even earlier. How long can the MMs hide these sells for?
It could or would help to understand the price movement. (I would like to see the arguments for the decision.)
Is it possible to find out this information?
I would suppose this overhang is now supported.
Fundamentalist
- 14 Oct 2005 15:12
- 381 of 1009
Fred
see theyve sold some more, down to 3.44%
Agree fully - very suspect if they sold prior to the drop, especially if they are taking part in the institutional placing (ie sell in the high 20s and repurchase at 21p as agreed in advance!) - not saying this is the case just a possibility. The alternative is RTD approached them to back the funding and Fuelserve takeover and they didnt like what they saw and hence started selling. Either way, the timing looks more than coincidence and is another example of the PI getting shafted at the hands of the institutions. BTW - youve got no chance of finding out for sure when they sold unless you know someone party to the transactions!
Still on the sidelines though have been tempted to get back in (on value grounds). Concerned that the price stays above the 21p offer price othereise there will be no take up on the 12-1 and as the deal doesnt appear to be underwritten then it would need to be funded with approx 5m of debt. Its a little close for comfort imo.
Until all this is resolved personally cant see much upside in the short term and will wait to evaluate the restated balance sheet before re-entering at these levels (though at 16-18p i couldnt resist!)
All IMHO DYOR etc etc
pachandl
- 14 Oct 2005 16:26
- 382 of 1009
Sp recovered - is this based on relief that it is only Barclas that are selling rather than everybody?
Fred1new
- 14 Oct 2005 18:26
- 384 of 1009
Overgrowth, Ignorance is not bliss. How do you know Barclays has be trading RTD especially in the low 30's? Is that when the dropped their load?
skyhigh
- 14 Oct 2005 20:36
- 385 of 1009
Sp has got to get back to 35p beofre you can say it's recovered!
(I got in at 17p over a year ago)
Fred1new
- 14 Oct 2005 23:21
- 386 of 1009
Sure but I might have recovered before that figure :-8
Anyway, I "feel" the management is as usual doing the right thing. But like Fundy would like to have been privy to a few of the board meetings over the last few months. I am a long term holder but expected the price to be well adhead of what it is at the moment.
It is sure to wabble a little until the financing of the pruchase is through, but could do very nicely over the next 6-12mths, if you can last that long.
Douggie, you can come off your respirator now. 8-)
Fred1new
- 17 Oct 2005 10:09
- 387 of 1009
Extracted from RTD Web site
"Retail Decisions (ReD), the fuel card operator and a world leader in card fraud prevention and payment processing, today announces the proposed acquisition of Fuelserv for 21.5 million in cash from DHL Distribution (part of Deutsche Post Group).
ReD also announces a Placing with institutional and certain other investors to raise approximately 13.3 million net of expenses (together with an Open Offer to Qualifying Shareholders of a further 5.1 million assuming it is taken up in full). The Group also proposes a share consolidation.
Fuelserv is the UKs second largest operator, by fuel volume, in the independent fuel card and bunkering sector with around 6,300 live customer accounts as at the end of 2004 and with more than 65,000 live fuel cards in issue as at 8 September 2005. Due to its size, the acquisition is a Class 1 transaction for ReD as defined by the UK Listing Authority, requiring shareholder approval at an EGM to be held on Friday 4 November 2005. "
Full Report http://www.redplc.com Investors news
Douggie
- 17 Oct 2005 11:35
- 388 of 1009
Hi been away for a week
so we know who/what new partner is........don't detect much excitement/anticipation re rising sp...;-/
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2005 16:11
- 389 of 1009
Any views out there? MMS holding the SP up at the moment on little volume.
Douggie
- 21 Oct 2005 16:50
- 390 of 1009
?????????????????...wish I knew what to do held up to 37p and
d
o
w
n again ;-/ so ?????????????? suspect I will hold if only as punishment for not sellling as I was suposed to do to pay for new car ..whic at that time would have been free.............was witing for the predicted 40p+ Ha.................
what about you Fred ?
Fred1new
- 21 Oct 2005 18:06
- 391 of 1009
IVC suggests it reasonable to take rights offfer, with the thought that they did a similar buy out successfully in Australia.
Would expect the price to drop a penny or so for a week. I still think its overall outlook is good. But hoped and expected that it would be in the early 40s now.
I will take up some and wait 6-8 weeks to see.
Overall RTD has been good to me.
robstuff
- 26 Oct 2005 14:25
- 392 of 1009
i'm surprised that the price has not fallen more with the current amount of selling and no-one buying. Any ideas what the Barclays transaction was all about, they seemed to buy and then sell, maybe for someone else, i.e.held in nomines for short while? or a bad investment decision?
Fundamentalist
- 26 Oct 2005 15:02
- 393 of 1009
Rob
only a guess but my view would be that they were offered to participate in the fund raising but werent overly impressed by the deal so decided to sell out. They appear to be selling down quite a lot of smaller co equity positions lately so there may be a more general market based strategy behind the decision (ie moving into more blue chip/defensive stocks)
Fundamentalist
- 26 Oct 2005 15:03
- 394 of 1009
Also, not at all surprised that the price has been pegged at the open offer price - the institutions buying in at 21p are likely to be keeping the price at or above that certainly in the short term
robstuff
- 26 Oct 2005 15:18
- 395 of 1009
thanks - good point.
Flackwell Vialli
- 26 Oct 2005 18:45
- 396 of 1009
Fundy - Why would they want to keep the offer at 21p - are you suggesting that they wish to take up o/o shares not taken up by shareholders ?
robstuff
- 27 Oct 2005 15:22
- 397 of 1009
I can't see why it's holding, it will fall below the 21 after the issue if not before