Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

bao wow (BAO)     

moscowmule - 03 Aug 2009 11:53

african minerals appears to be upping its stake - possible takeover / offer?

Toya - 30 Jan 2013 19:56 - 379 of 477

:)

blanche - 31 Jan 2013 16:51 - 380 of 477

Glad I didn't sell any.More rises tomorrow. 8-)

Balerboy - 31 Jan 2013 16:56 - 381 of 477

yes you've had a good day..... i didn't have the b***s...... no comment cynic;)

cynic - 01 Feb 2013 08:13 - 382 of 477

have put in a stop at 33.5 which, if sp keeps moving up, so will my stop ..... really don't now care if i get stopped out and that proives "too early", which only hindsight will clarify

i owe Number2 Son an expensive dinner i think!

=================

and now stopped out
it was always my intent to sell before the news anyway, so i shall now sit back and watch ..... don't think i'm brave enough to short, though just may be persuaded later

Balerboy - 01 Feb 2013 08:39 - 383 of 477

i put my small profit in lonmin.....£1 up so far from my ave.,.

cynic - 01 Feb 2013 16:09 - 384 of 477

have now shorted here at 34 with a stop at 40 and a limit at 25.25, as unfortunately i'll prob be in a meeting by the time the news comes out and/or market opens ...... however, there looks to be little or no buying interest, and any news on monday is surely going to have to be pretty amazing if hefty profit taking is not to ensue .... we shall see

cynic - 04 Feb 2013 08:57 - 385 of 477

was expecting news today, but perhaps later ...... in any case, effectively no interest at all in this stock today

cynic - 06 Feb 2013 08:27 - 386 of 477

many pages of abuse back (post 271), Number2 Son reckoned
"Meant to be 2 resource upgrades and release of pre-feasibility study for mining operation before a big industry event on 4th february"

now it may be that his info was a bit wonky, but if not, it should be of considerable concern that this update from BAO is now relatively significantly overdue ..... that never presages well, though i admit to being an interested party (short!)

sp currently drifting day by day, so a caveat is certainly in order after such a massive run north

blanche - 06 Feb 2013 10:00 - 387 of 477

Cynic, No specific dates were said. Just during Feb, So technically not overdue. Good time to close yer short. That's what the company is obviously waiting for. ;-)

cynic - 13 Feb 2013 08:44 - 388 of 477

i note your useful comment blanche, but meanwhile interest in this stock has faded away and it continues to drift south ..... i am now nicely in money, and i may heed your advice to bank a(nother) nice profit, say before w/e .... certainly i need to remind myself that shares are for making money and that it is all too easy to blow profits, even with sensible stops in place

cynic - 13 Feb 2013 09:06 - 389 of 477

i heeded your advice and obeyed my own discipline .... i can now watch and wait with total equanimity :-)

blanche - 13 Feb 2013 19:31 - 390 of 477

Gonna be another Sharp rise in the sp any day now. Don't miss out.

cynic - 13 Feb 2013 19:41 - 391 of 477

perhaps .... i've certainly done well of late, purely riding the momentum

cynic - 19 Feb 2013 08:16 - 392 of 477

a very unexciting update ..... am sorely tempted to short again

cynic - 22 Feb 2013 13:04 - 393 of 477

and so i did, later that day at 28.75, though relatively modestly ..... yes, i know i kept that one quiet as i was unsure whether or not it was a smart move

Balerboy - 22 Feb 2013 19:51 - 394 of 477

Good job magicjo not about.......... oh dear.,.

chuckles - 22 Feb 2013 19:54 - 395 of 477

did i miss the sharp rise?

dreamcatcher - 22 Feb 2013 20:56 - 396 of 477

post 393 :-))

cynic - 22 Feb 2013 21:11 - 397 of 477

i have no need .... i own up to mistakes, and assuredly this was not one - read 392

dreamcatcher - 22 Feb 2013 21:37 - 398 of 477

I'm only joking but it could be read that you were thinking of shorting (post 392).
Then post (393) some three days later if you shorted later that day, your post states you indeed shorted . The day of this post the share happens to lets say crash after the three days before were fairly modest falls. It can be read this way, not that I am reading it that way. In other words not to be picked up about it, would be best would it not, to post ones actions not three days later?
Register now or login to post to this thread.