goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
dreamcatcher
- 12 Mar 2014 14:15
- 38071 of 81564
Major building fire/explosion in New York. Building collapse.
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 14:17
- 38072 of 81564
ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Quick get Hays on the case.
aldwickk
- 12 Mar 2014 14:24
- 38073 of 81564
goldfinger
Yes i saw the article
What i want to know is how to make money on the internet , what comes up top on google is buying and selling Domain names [ flipping ] , haven't done much research yet , has anybody on here done it ?
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 14:35
- 38074 of 81564
Hays will be your best bet on that alders.
Fred1new
- 12 Mar 2014 15:25
- 38075 of 81564
Sounds like a suitable coupling.
cynic
- 12 Mar 2014 16:07
- 38076 of 81564
sticky - as "your" own paper admits, hammond has not acted illegally in any way at all, so start again, though you may find the moral stance a little tricky having already written loud, clear and unequivocally, "He as much right as anyone else" about someone else
cynic
- 12 Mar 2014 16:09
- 38077 of 81564
the amount of garbage deposited daily on this thread is mind-boggling .... it is staggering quite how much yardage has been added since i went out in the sunshine this morning
Fred1new
- 12 Mar 2014 16:16
- 38078 of 81564
Manuel,
Hammond!
But he is still made of the same substance as you are!
Mind the problems the UK have are all due to the unemployed and the basic wage being to high!
Anyway, I thought you would be in court supporting Nigel. How is he doing?
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 16:22
- 38079 of 81564
cynic - 12 Mar 2014 16:09 - 38079 of 38080
the amount of garbage deposited daily on this thread is mind-boggling----------ends
YES most of it comes from you and the Aberdeen ass licker Christine Carson.
Haystack
- 12 Mar 2014 16:41
- 38080 of 81564
Splitting tax between husband and wife is not immoral. It has been happening for as long as I can remember. Everyone I know splits their income that way if they have a business. My wife did some admin for my business and as a result I was employing her. I chose to pay her the same as me. That way you minimise tax.
cynic
- 12 Mar 2014 16:47
- 38081 of 81564
tut tut sticky
suggest you do your homework before accusing :-)
======
just done a little 5-minute exercise of posts for today only
"yardage" posted pp - unkown
garbage posted pp - depends who is judging
posts - 50 (very convenient)
of these 50, no less than 18 are from good friend sticky!
hays is a distant 2nd with 6 posts
cynic, fossy, max, rf, aldo - 4 each
remainder of 6 posts from 5 contributors
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 16:59
- 38082 of 81564
So as Hammond lays countless members of the armed forces off and into poverty he himself helps himself to a by all means increase in income on top of his ministerial salary...........yes manuel and Hays that sounds fair.
Anyway it wont be happening come mid 2015 when the labour government move from a earnings Tax system to a asset Tax system and at the same a REDISTRIBUTION of wealth.
Its coming boys so you had better make provisions to move abroad.........may I suggest Afghanistan.
May I also suggest you take ass licker Christine Carson with you.
cynic
- 12 Mar 2014 17:01
- 38083 of 81564
yet again sticky, you have decided to distort what i actually wrote ..... i know you'll find it much too much like hard work to even look back a few pages(!), so herewith ....
sticky writes yesterday, "He as much right as anyone else."
well so does this chap, and even the mirror admits there was nothing illegal in the manoeuvre
however, in this instance, i certainly concur with the mirror that as a tax wheeze in the public eye, it was pretty indefensible ..... but legally, it is no different at all from Bob Crow and his council house
so to repeat, "He as much right as anyone else."
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 17:04
- 38084 of 81564
Just done an exercise on the "250 consider Trading thread"........didnt bother counting the posts the trading material posted their was to say at least sub standard.........make no wonder Hillary (old goat) as to keep poping down from the premium board to put them right all the time.
Lacking leadership, now please remind me whom the thread author is!!!!!!!!!!!!
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 17:10
- 38085 of 81564
Bob Crow isnt a minister of the government preaching austerity that isnt and shouldnt have been needed as is pointed out by no other than George Soros today.
Hammond is just a penny pinching crook along with his wife and is using a tax loophole that shouldnt exist.
But Like i said yesterday all labour have to do is sit back and the tories will hand them the next general election on a plate.
Haystack
- 12 Mar 2014 17:11
- 38086 of 81564
Hammond's tax arrangement only saves him £200/month. That's hardly earth shattering or even very much.
You need to worry more about Philip Green who put his Top Shop business in his wife's name. She lives in Monaco, so there is no tax on dividends. It saved him close to £1b in one year on his dividends. He lives in Monaco as well and flies in on Monday mornings by private jet for the week. That is all legal as well.
Haystack
- 12 Mar 2014 17:13
- 38087 of 81564
Of course Philip Green did all his tax adjustments under Labour.
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 17:16
- 38088 of 81564
£200 a month is enough to feed 4 YTS trainees or should I say LOL ohhhhhhh LOL apprentices.
As for Philip Greeen we will catch him or at least make it so that he cant visit these shores again which will really shatter him and dont think it wont.
goldfinger
- 12 Mar 2014 17:18
- 38089 of 81564
Yes under Blair.
You forget Hays dim wit, I was supporting the Conservative party at the time.
cynic
- 12 Mar 2014 17:25
- 38090 of 81564
sticky - stop being a wriggly worm ..... you really can't bear being shown up - yet again, i'm afraid - for distorting what i have written, and just resort to silly antics to try to divert attention