Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

that's a load of bullshit!
you need the organ grinder and tell the numpty receptionist or whoever they put you through to, that legal action could be instigated imminently so it behoves them to put you through to a director
don't forget to get all names and rank as you get passed along the line, and remind them that you are keeping a log of the call(s)

don't put up with the usual rubbish and delaying tactics!

Number of NHS managers re-employed after receiving redundancy doubles

David Cameron accused of handing out cheques like 'confetti' as it is revealed one in six managers given redundancy pay outs are now back working in the health service



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10702318/Number-of-NHS-managers-re-employed-after-receiving-redundancy-doubles.html

Max,

The cash is going to those of his own ilk.

----

Ahoj,

As Cynic suggests.

If you are sure of your position, then solicitor.

Contact by e-mail and phone.


Telling them that you are recording the conversation and "gently" informing them of the facts. (If you haven't taping facilities pen, paper and pencil will have to do.)

If you are trading by inter-net then ask them for a copy of the times, sizes and directions of your transactions. (Normal trading pattern,)

Ask them for time to consider their information and stating that you will reply in specific time period.

But bear in mind the outlay of doing the above.

Good Luck!

ExecLine - post 38323 - there's a terrific obituary to her in the Daily Telegraph.

Francesco Maggioni ‏@fmaggioni
#Bears are now surfacing in the equity river to catch all salmon investors,despite hunting season will start in 2H..........

'Goodbye' to Clarissa

I thought she would have died before now with the amount of red meat and fat she consumed.

One more blood sport [ hare couseing ] person less.

gf
He made his money by starting up Sports Direct and floating it. Sounds like he deserves the money,

aldwickk - never mind the red meat and the fat, what about the alcohol?!

"Her “habit” soon consisted of two bottles of gin a day, and a bottle of vodka before she got out of bed. “

Its what hes doing now hays that counts like Mann MP says.

If were comparing like with like thats the only way you can look at it.

Like I said if theirs been a big change since Torys came to power then it should be investigated and if not labour are just as guilty as the Tories.

What does it mattter what he does with his money now He made it starting and running a successful business. He is now enjoying his money. Do you begrudge him his money? That looks like envy. Maybe you should look at sportsmen lik footballers. It is all market forces. The father of one of my son's fiends sold his business for £32m a few years ago and he put it into high value property. Good luck to him. He still works as the MD of the company that he sold out to. He is now worth £100m+.

Any way Hays he didnt make his money by starting up sports direct he was loaned private money from influential big wig freinds (some say underground crooks) and opened ski shops in London.

A very shady character imo............and others.

Tax authorities have little history on him.

OK yep you can say hes a self made man from middle class parents but theirs always a question mark over how when he received his starting capital.

Lets face it not a great example of an entrepeneur.

And its not what he does with his money that counts in his case, its where he got it from!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh come now sticky!
unless you have something more substantive to attach to "shady money", then it matters not at all from whom he borrowed it
if he had none of his own, then he showed good business nous, and in any case, as in all walks of life in all sorts of matters, it's who you know - it's called networking nowadays, and it's up to you to make that work in your favour - aka business nous

You obviously have followed his past history Cyners.

Hes always being talked about as being a tax evader. But the authoritys cant nab him.................YET.

Are you saying youd take money from the like of the Kray twins and the like????

can't say i know anything at all about the chap
in that case, perhaps i misread the purpose of your post - always assuming that what you post about him is based on published fact or similar

that said, i re-read what you posted and you're clearly making up a story as you go along, based at best on supposition or even and quite probably, even less

It was Hays who led the debate in this direction.

Im still trying to find some moral conviction as to why 5 people (4 born with the spoon in ones mouth the other a very suspected dodgy character)should own more wealth than the poorest 20% in a mature civilised country like Britain.

Why not? Their money has been made or passed on due to death. Nothing wrong with inherited wealth. If you make money then why not pass it on to the next generation. Money is not done sacred thing It has no morality attached to it. It is like leaving BG someone a set of cufflink nks.

the politics of jealousy are singularly ugly, though you seem to subscribe to them
anyway fwiw, i repost what i wrote earlier .....

it would be at least as interesting to determine how many people these "5 richest families" employ in their enterprises and how many more are thus indirectly dependent upon them

===============

shall we revisit the bible and the parable of the talents?

Haystack - 17 Mar 2014 16:44 - 38346 of 38347

Why not? Their money has been made or passed on due to death....................ends

Exactly Hays and that why when labour take over control in 2015 we will change the tax system from one based on income to one based on assets and the re- distribution of wealth.

A far fairer and moral system.

Human atainment will be based on personal ability not inheritance.

Of course they won't do that. Labour always say silly things like that, but never do them.