goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
MaxK
- 17 Mar 2014 14:14
- 38329 of 81564
Number of NHS managers re-employed after receiving redundancy doubles
David Cameron accused of handing out cheques like 'confetti' as it is revealed one in six managers given redundancy pay outs are now back working in the health service
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10702318/Number-of-NHS-managers-re-employed-after-receiving-redundancy-doubles.html
Fred1new
- 17 Mar 2014 14:38
- 38330 of 81564
Max,
The cash is going to those of his own ilk.
----
Ahoj,
As Cynic suggests.
If you are sure of your position, then solicitor.
Contact by e-mail and phone.
Telling them that you are recording the conversation and "gently" informing them of the facts. (If you haven't taping facilities pen, paper and pencil will have to do.)
If you are trading by inter-net then ask them for a copy of the times, sizes and directions of your transactions. (Normal trading pattern,)
Ask them for time to consider their information and stating that you will reply in specific time period.
But bear in mind the outlay of doing the above.
Good Luck!
doodlebug4
- 17 Mar 2014 15:00
- 38331 of 81564
ExecLine - post 38323 - there's a terrific obituary to her in the Daily Telegraph.
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 15:08
- 38332 of 81564
Francesco Maggioni @fmaggioni
#Bears are now surfacing in the equity river to catch all salmon investors,despite hunting season will start in 2H..........
aldwickk
- 17 Mar 2014 15:27
- 38333 of 81564
'Goodbye' to Clarissa
I thought she would have died before now with the amount of red meat and fat she consumed.
One more blood sport [ hare couseing ] person less.
Haystack
- 17 Mar 2014 15:29
- 38334 of 81564
gf
He made his money by starting up Sports Direct and floating it. Sounds like he deserves the money,
doodlebug4
- 17 Mar 2014 15:39
- 38335 of 81564
aldwickk - never mind the red meat and the fat, what about the alcohol?!
"Her “habit” soon consisted of two bottles of gin a day, and a bottle of vodka before she got out of bed. “
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 15:40
- 38336 of 81564
Its what hes doing now hays that counts like Mann MP says.
If were comparing like with like thats the only way you can look at it.
Like I said if theirs been a big change since Torys came to power then it should be investigated and if not labour are just as guilty as the Tories.
Haystack
- 17 Mar 2014 16:01
- 38337 of 81564
What does it mattter what he does with his money now He made it starting and running a successful business. He is now enjoying his money. Do you begrudge him his money? That looks like envy. Maybe you should look at sportsmen lik footballers. It is all market forces. The father of one of my son's fiends sold his business for £32m a few years ago and he put it into high value property. Good luck to him. He still works as the MD of the company that he sold out to. He is now worth £100m+.
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 16:03
- 38338 of 81564
Any way Hays he didnt make his money by starting up sports direct he was loaned private money from influential big wig freinds (some say underground crooks) and opened ski shops in London.
A very shady character imo............and others.
Tax authorities have little history on him.
OK yep you can say hes a self made man from middle class parents but theirs always a question mark over how when he received his starting capital.
Lets face it not a great example of an entrepeneur.
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 16:05
- 38339 of 81564
And its not what he does with his money that counts in his case, its where he got it from!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
cynic
- 17 Mar 2014 16:11
- 38340 of 81564
oh come now sticky!
unless you have something more substantive to attach to "shady money", then it matters not at all from whom he borrowed it
if he had none of his own, then he showed good business nous, and in any case, as in all walks of life in all sorts of matters, it's who you know - it's called networking nowadays, and it's up to you to make that work in your favour - aka business nous
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 16:25
- 38341 of 81564
You obviously have followed his past history Cyners.
Hes always being talked about as being a tax evader. But the authoritys cant nab him.................YET.
Are you saying youd take money from the like of the Kray twins and the like????
cynic
- 17 Mar 2014 16:28
- 38342 of 81564
can't say i know anything at all about the chap
in that case, perhaps i misread the purpose of your post - always assuming that what you post about him is based on published fact or similar
that said, i re-read what you posted and you're clearly making up a story as you go along, based at best on supposition or even and quite probably, even less
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 16:38
- 38343 of 81564
It was Hays who led the debate in this direction.
Im still trying to find some moral conviction as to why 5 people (4 born with the spoon in ones mouth the other a very suspected dodgy character)should own more wealth than the poorest 20% in a mature civilised country like Britain.
Haystack
- 17 Mar 2014 16:44
- 38344 of 81564
Why not? Their money has been made or passed on due to death. Nothing wrong with inherited wealth. If you make money then why not pass it on to the next generation. Money is not done sacred thing It has no morality attached to it. It is like leaving BG someone a set of cufflink nks.
cynic
- 17 Mar 2014 16:47
- 38345 of 81564
the politics of jealousy are singularly ugly, though you seem to subscribe to them
anyway fwiw, i repost what i wrote earlier .....
it would be at least as interesting to determine how many people these "5 richest families" employ in their enterprises and how many more are thus indirectly dependent upon them
===============
shall we revisit the bible and the parable of the talents?
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 16:56
- 38346 of 81564
Haystack - 17 Mar 2014 16:44 - 38346 of 38347
Why not? Their money has been made or passed on due to death....................ends
Exactly Hays and that why when labour take over control in 2015 we will change the tax system from one based on income to one based on assets and the re- distribution of wealth.
A far fairer and moral system.
Human atainment will be based on personal ability not inheritance.
Haystack
- 17 Mar 2014 17:00
- 38347 of 81564
Of course they won't do that. Labour always say silly things like that, but never do them.
goldfinger
- 17 Mar 2014 17:09
- 38348 of 81564
They are this time...... an increase on all.
1.Council Tax bands G@H to be increased at least 25%
2. Mansion Tax on Houses capital value £2 million
3. Tax on public school boys and certain universitys
4. Banker tax on either A, bonus or B, taxable salary
5. Tax on Gentlemens clubs.
6. Tax increase on whiskey brandy and rum.
7. Tax on private hospitals.
8. Tax on private dentists and doctor practises
9. Top rate of tax 50% on 150,000
10. Tax on equestrian events and some golf clubs.
All this to take place in the first 5 years of government.