goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 24 Mar 2014 15:47
- 38746 of 81564
having started off thinking there was something sinister, i am now of the opinion that it was just the pilot who "lost the plot" completely, probably due to personal reasons - e.g. huge gambling debts
MaxK
- 24 Mar 2014 15:51
- 38747 of 81564
There were two pilots.
Haystack
- 24 Mar 2014 15:53
- 38748 of 81564
That would mean the co pilot was out of the cockpit and couldn't get in for 7 hours.
More like an electrical problem.
doodlebug4
- 24 Mar 2014 15:53
- 38749 of 81564
ExecLine - post 38742 - my £5 says you are right. I hope he does get put in jail for a long time.
Haystack
- 24 Mar 2014 15:57
- 38750 of 81564
Pretorius guilty. Several accounts of woman's screams before shots. Blood on wall near bed and on duvet,
At least with no jury, you just have to bribe one judge.
cynic
- 24 Mar 2014 16:01
- 38751 of 81564
depends how obvious it is or was that the various instruments etc had been tampered with and/or i guess the co-pilot could have been put out of action one way or another
doodlebug4
- 24 Mar 2014 16:06
- 38752 of 81564
He's into guns, fast cars, pornography, pretty blondes - if he had a male judge then he might stand a slight chance! This trial could probably be stopped right now and I could say the defence don't have a leg to stand on, but in the circumstances that is probably a very inappropriate comment. ( post 38752 )
Haystack
- 24 Mar 2014 16:07
- 38753 of 81564
The passengers would have known that it was going wrong way at some point.
goldfinger
- 24 Mar 2014 16:18
- 38754 of 81564
Fred I based it for illustrative purposes on £1 a point S/BET.
In a real situation you would firstly and always decide what you pre- determined stop loss is first ie, 2% of your total portfolio. For example £2,000 quid of a £100,000 total portfolio.
Then you would decide what size of bet you were going to go for.
Say in this example £200 a point therefore £200 / £2,000 = 10 points, therefore present SP was 52p, your stop loss would be set at 42p and because your aim is to at least double your loss the SP target would be 52p plus 20 points =72p. If you hit this you can then let it run with a tight following stop loss.
All the time if your making a gain youd be moving your stop loss at 42p up anyway.
You can use this system on S/Bets CFDS or shares.
I think this explains it a bit better than the one yesterday where I was trying to accomodate the chart into the 2*2 system and over complicated it a bit.
Hope this explains it a bit easier, let me know if you require further info.
cheers gf.
Fred1new
- 24 Mar 2014 16:24
- 38755 of 81564
GF.
Thanks,
I understand, but was a little surprised by time periods.
Although at the moment I have some SBs for longer than I expected or wished.
cynic
- 24 Mar 2014 16:29
- 38756 of 81564
hays - phone signal from the plane was also blacked out
Haystack
- 24 Mar 2014 16:31
- 38757 of 81564
Pilot locks other pilot out of cockpit. Pilot stops pressurisation of plane and uses his personal air supply and that of copilot. Repressurises plane when all dead and flies to Indian Ocean.
There has to be several films in planning stage with final script waiting to be finished.
Maybe a musical with the passengers dancing down the aisles singing an appropriate song about 'all going to the Indian Ocean'.
goldfinger
- 24 Mar 2014 16:46
- 38758 of 81564
Yep Fred its because I was using a £1 a point first time.
When you have a bigger bet per point you dont get as many points for your brass therefore time period also closed down when your just looking for 20 points upside.
This is how all the top fund managers and analysts are trained.
Chris Carson
- 24 Mar 2014 17:05
- 38759 of 81564
I use a daily rolling bet if I think time frame will be less than a week irrespective of size of bet. This incurs an overnight charge. More than a week a quarterly bet, spread is a little wider but no further charges. At end of quarterly period choice of closing or rolling over for further quarter, charge a few more pips.
goldfinger
- 24 Mar 2014 18:18
- 38760 of 81564
Yep I use them sometimes Chris. Have to close out before 4.15 if I dont want to let it roll over anymore.
required field
- 24 Mar 2014 18:47
- 38763 of 81564
I'm still going for the shuttle collision and a huge cover-up....
Fred1new
- 24 Mar 2014 19:13
- 38764 of 81564
Cloud or sea water?
goldfinger
- 24 Mar 2014 19:23
- 38765 of 81564
EL im not a big fan of physical stop losses especially in volatile markets with all the spikes especially morning ones.
What I do is place my stop down on a note pad and keep a mental note.
What you dont want is the stop being to tight on the SP or you will be taken out easily and you also dont want it too slack or again you will lose too much money before its hit.
On the system when you move into profit I suggest you move it up behind the SP in % jumps and keep to the same % jump as you go higher and higher all the way up until you reach the target SP at 72p. You would obviously carry on and let it run at this stage until you get stopped out.
We have the SP at 52p and the stop loss at 42p under the system but that wouldnt mean you could impose your own stop loss at say 10% loss so yould have a stop loss at 46p/47p what youd have to remember is though that under the system the max you can allow the SP to fall to, to limit loses to 2% of your portfolio is 42p.
I think IG Index have software for this so it automaticaly does it for you.
cheers GF