markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 08:18
- 3900 of 6492
you mean like no oil? :-))
HARRYCAT
- 11 Mar 2010 08:47
- 3902 of 6492
"Calm down dear, it's only a graph!"
Should now be logging & then well testing to come:
"Well testing involves bringing out a facsimile prod unit, choke manifold, portable seperator, surface tree and associated hoses, piping etc, to allow the well to flow to the flare boom on the rig. There would be a clean-up flow for perhaps 12 hours to clean up the well and get rid of anything that could impede the flow. After allowing the well to re-pressurize back to where it was, they would then begin the well test. This is then burned off for perhaps a 12/24/48 hour period to determine how much flow and productivity the well would produce through a set orifice, or on various sizes of orifice (choke size). The well is then closed in and pressures allowed to build back. This gives an idea of the size and quantity of the reservoir being tested"
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 08:53
- 3903 of 6492
+/-100 is a pretty good support level (in normal circumstances) ..... should this well be a dud, then expect a prompt fall to +/-60, at which point, it arguably becomes a buy again
of course, should at least a respectable amount amount of oil be found, then expect the acrid smell a burnt bear fur
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 11:21
- 3904 of 6492
i'm not frightfully good at interpreting L2 numbers, so i would appreciate someone else's input
my reading of the position is that the selling (offers) at realistic prices has now nearly dried up, and that buys (bid) at similarly realistic prices pretty much match numerically, or even outweigh
if that interpretation is correct, then the brave may fancy at a punt at this level
Balerboy
- 11 Mar 2010 12:24
- 3905 of 6492
need a very long pole.........very deep round the faulklands.....don't fall off cynic.
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 12:26
- 3906 of 6492
i use it for dancing, though HSE now insists that this falls under the "working at heights directive" so it is mandatory to wear a full safety harness, hard hat and steel-capped boots
Balerboy
- 11 Mar 2010 12:29
- 3907 of 6492
you in a leather thong and kinky boots........
Balerboy
- 11 Mar 2010 12:36
- 3909 of 6492
think I'm more right with my spelling than you are with your predicktions on DES. lol
kimoldfield
- 11 Mar 2010 12:36
- 3910 of 6492
That's the posh end of Port Stanley. :o)
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 12:38
- 3911 of 6492
BB - not telling you; it would be bad for your health
Balerboy
- 11 Mar 2010 12:45
- 3912 of 6492
lol
required field
- 11 Mar 2010 13:07
- 3913 of 6492
We could have a situation where they discover oil or gas but just below a commercial quantity : now what would the sp do ? shoot up in the hope that the next well comes good or drop because the market would think that big amounts of crude will not be found !...tricky !....n'est-ce-pas ?.
required field
- 11 Mar 2010 13:09
- 3914 of 6492
By the way anybody any idea as to how much crude WTI should be found for it to be declared commercial ? or gas ?....
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 13:21
- 3915 of 6492
if you use HAWK as the criteria, then anything more than 100 bpd is bonanza time!
markymar
- 11 Mar 2010 13:22
- 3916 of 6492
required field
- 11 Mar 2010 13:26
- 3917 of 6492
At a guess I'd say 30 million barrels....which coud be extracted with another well somehow not far away....just a guess....the cost is staggering in such a far location.