markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 15:30
- 3926 of 6492
they work extremely hard on these rigs and i dare say the guy was too damn tired to answer ..... and certainly not impossible that the crew are under strictest instructions to divulge nothing
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 16:05
- 3927 of 6492
L2 now looking very interesting .....
12,000 bid for at 95.25
below that, 140,000 at 92.0
on the other side there are
5,000 on offer at 96.5
and the next offered are 10,000 at 101.0
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 16:23
- 3929 of 6492
sorry - i was talking balls yet again
Balerboy
- 11 Mar 2010 18:16
- 3930 of 6492
bit like this share.....no balls!!
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 18:38
- 3931 of 6492
had 'em cut off as got fed up with them being kicked
hlyeo98
- 11 Mar 2010 19:27
- 3932 of 6492
Sell DES at all costs... it will be sinking like the Titanic!
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 19:51
- 3933 of 6492
and what do you know that no one else does, or are you merely shouting the odds because oil exploration always has longer odds than 50/50?
by the way, have you shorted this stock?
if so, and by the way you write, i assume you have risked your house, please confirm including how much
btw, no pathetic excuse that you don't have a shorting facility, because that's bollocks
watcher
- 11 Mar 2010 20:17
- 3934 of 6492
why would anyone sell these babies without confirmation of no oil......no oil at all....which means all the other options have proved to be no go.....we all know how long that will take.....and what the DES men think about those options....and the technical data and the cost of the rig......a few shots at the target yet....(including the first)....might be the first round or the last.....but the only way is to watch
HARRYCAT
- 11 Mar 2010 20:36
- 3935 of 6492
hlyeo, that's a bit of a shocker even for you! Suspect that was fuelled by alcohol during Liverpool defeat! Blatant de-ramping is for other BB's (mentioning no names).
cynic
- 11 Mar 2010 22:14
- 3936 of 6492
it's not deramping .... it was just a load of rubbish written without any kind of supporting thought or logic .... not responding to my post pretty much sums it up
markymar
- 12 Mar 2010 08:21
- 3937 of 6492
http://www.bgs.ac.uk/falklands-oil/download/news.pdf
Falkland Islands Government
Department of Mineral Resources
required field
- 12 Mar 2010 12:04
- 3938 of 6492
Topped up for the last time until drilling update...plus a small spread...risky but 6 months for it to come right....
HARRYCAT
- 12 Mar 2010 12:07
- 3939 of 6492
RKH might be a slightly safer play atm, as it will drop on a DES duster, but recover quickly as potential still there for their drilling campaign.
cynic
- 12 Mar 2010 12:19
- 3940 of 6492
i can see no way in which RKH or any other of these falklands oilies can be safer than DES - safer being very much a relative word ..... where DES goes, so will the others for it is DES that will control sentiment across the board until such a time as the others start or at least get close to their own spudding.
HARRYCAT
- 12 Mar 2010 12:24
- 3941 of 6492
Of course, but a DES duster would be a fait accompli for them, but would only affect temporary sentiment in others as punters would still expect results elsewhere, imo.
required field
- 12 Mar 2010 12:31
- 3942 of 6492
Topped up in Rockhopper as well.....less downside....and in the event of a strike even with a small ownership percentage will rocket just like DES.....6 wells to come.....must hit something by christmas...change that to : must hope they hit something by christmas....
cynic
- 12 Mar 2010 12:52
- 3943 of 6492
am i not right in thinking that drilling started about 20th feb? ..... that being so, surely news not really expected until mid next week at the very earliest?
HARRYCAT
- 12 Mar 2010 13:16
- 3945 of 6492
Trimming out the dross & hype, the consensus seems to be that, assuming they haven't encountered any serious problems, they should now be at or reaching the logging stage (i.e TD has been reached), to be followed by well testing. Next week would be about right for news.