Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


016622 - 13 May 2005 09:44 - 3960 of 27111

a good piece by Tom Bulford, not just on rf but a good deal on frogpack which looks an astounding product (and will give ii another seo headache to worry about!)
(piss off ii)

superrod - 13 May 2005 09:45 - 3961 of 27111

ii
you are fond of asking questions.......heres one for you.

how come nearly every thread has a resident doom monger, posting 24/7, and ALWAYS with no interest in the stock they deride?

there may be the odd philanthropist eager to save us poor souls from ourselves, but basically i really dont see the point.

Bullshare - 13 May 2005 09:48 - 3962 of 27111

Just to let you know that we do monitor this thread (and all others). We have today removed a poster who was trying to be clever by creating a user name mimicing someone elses.

We take these things pretty seriously and as we have done in the past, we will not hesitate to contact their IP provider or workplace(if using a work email) to ensure that their IP address is blocked so that such a breach does not occur again.

Also we should set out once again our posting policy!


Content Standards
As part of our commitment to make our Bulletin Boards as informative, user friendly and free from abuse as possible for our users, please read the following Content Standards which apply to any and all material (contributions) which you make to the Website including the Bulletin Boards and which incorporate our General Terms and Conditions .

Your commitment to these Standards ensures a positive experience for all of our users.

The Standards

You must comply with the spirit of the following standards as well as the letter. The Standards apply to each part of any Contribution as well as to its whole.

Contributions must:


Be accurate where they state facts

Be genuinely held where they state opinions

Comply with applicable law in any country from which they are posted
Contributions must not:


Contain any material which is defamatory of any other person;

Contain any material which is obscene or offensive;

Infringe any copyright, database right or trade mark of any other person;

Be likely to deceive any person;

Be made in breach of any legal duty owed to a third party such as a contractual duty or a duty of confidence;

Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person;

Be likely to disrupt our service in any way;

Give the impression that they emanate from us where this is not the case;

Advocate promote or assist any unlawful act such as (by way of example only) copyright infringement or computer misuse;

Advertise any product or service other than MoneyAM without our prior written consent;
We caution against giving out any personally identifiable information (such as private email address, telephone number or home address) online. This information can easily be used for illegal or harmful purposes.

Please also be mindful of your fellow subscribers and treat them with the respect and courtesy they deserve.

If we discover that you have been abusing the Bulletin Board we reserve the right to remove your access to our site.



Mike
MoneyAM

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 09:53 - 3963 of 27111

Well said Mike

By the way 016622 & superrod - a fiver into the swear box please

Baza

016622 - 13 May 2005 10:16 - 3964 of 27111

Hmmmmm...

bosley - 13 May 2005 10:23 - 3965 of 27111

"Contributions must not:

Be likely to harass, upset, embarrass, alarm or annoy any other person; "

i think it's pretty clear he is annoying most of us.

bosley - 13 May 2005 10:27 - 3966 of 27111

btw, what's a t trade?

jimmy b - 13 May 2005 10:32 - 3967 of 27111

Got to say i agree with you bosley, i posted something on the rampers thread but got steamed in to by some one,, it seems this is ok for one , but the joker who i found quite funny and wasn't harassing anyone had to go (and no it wasn't me), i will be keeping my investment in SEO but im a bit fed up of this thread,,your all good guys and girls ,,but it seems moneyam are quite happy to let this person harass,,alarm,,and annoy..JB..

superrod - 13 May 2005 10:36 - 3968 of 27111

Baza
on what grounds do i put a fiver in the swear box?

sidtrix - 13 May 2005 10:40 - 3969 of 27111

Ditto!

harass,alarm, annoy, bug and waste our time with irrelevant posts
Even if we squelch, others keep commenting on him so have to read those posts!

Think time to reinstate insiderInsider and get rid of the TRUE source of the problem: ii!

driver - 13 May 2005 10:45 - 3970 of 27111

bos
Click on Help, and then on Trades it will give you a list, copy print and stick it on your screen, on second thoughts by your keyboard.
Who are they getting rid of Don Q 1 or Don Q 2 who sounded like a very nice boy?

016622 - 13 May 2005 10:48 - 3971 of 27111

with you on that one sid...
whilst the sp is bobbing about and were all waiting for some more good news, its good to have "a bit of a laugh" and not have to read someones constant doom ,pesimism and scaremongering!!

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 10:49 - 3972 of 27111

superrod - in your mail 3960 you referred to him who we dont refer to - the penalty being a fiver in the swear box - to be used at Doncaster when we celebrate

Baza

driver - 13 May 2005 10:57 - 3973 of 27111

superrod
You can use the term Don Q to get round 1910's exorbitant amount.

superrod - 13 May 2005 10:57 - 3974 of 27111

fair enough

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 11:23 - 3975 of 27111

Not sure if thats a yellow card Superrod !!!!

Anyway - nice tight spread - does that mean anything? - like MM's getting short of stock ?

Baza

AdieH - 13 May 2005 11:26 - 3976 of 27111

Ok Tim has forecast 50p as a new target price, do we think this is realistic in the short term, will the BPRG fiasco have any bearing on this or do we think the court case is now chicken feed compared to the revenue generated by Asda etc etc? Welcome anyones comments as wondering if its worth dipping my toe in again...

bosley - 13 May 2005 11:36 - 3977 of 27111

adieh, short term forcast can be anything you want it to be. you already know this is driven by news and it seems that there is plenty in the pipeline, asda , potentially walmart, frogpack in uk and america. the cc is there in the background but , i feel , already factored in, (although if the cc does go against them in the court of appeal then there could well be a short term dip). as always dyor, but it would be good to have your input on this thread. also, you should have held in the first place!!!! :)

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 11:39 - 3978 of 27111

Article in todays times about WalMart expanding into India - this just gets better and better.

Yes I know we should not be counting chickens - but the potential is there.

I am a cautious type - but I am overweight in SEO and I still have a target of 30p. I promised myself that I would not buy any more and will wait now and see if that is breached - which I hope will be pretty soon.

I keep on telling myself that there is no such thing as a cert - and that shares are risky - and this one is still in the high risk category - just to balance the greedy side of my nature.

So I bought some more this morning !!!

Baza

AdieH - 13 May 2005 12:09 - 3979 of 27111

Thanks bosley, well i took profit and ran (in hindsight I should have stayed but hey hoooo), well done to those that stayed, I will be back but just waiting for my target price (I live in hope)...
Register now or login to post to this thread.