Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

cynic - 21 Apr 2014 20:24 - 39803 of 81564

it's just a really stupid and unwarranted comment
why on earth there isn't a stipulated quota of starter-price homes, i really do not know or even begin to understand, but that in no way correlates to or justifies your very silly comment
almost needless to say, the developers would much rather build houses to give the maximum return rather than lower value ones, but your haha-logic is (surprise surprise) totally preposterous

MaxK - 21 Apr 2014 21:33 - 39805 of 81564

Would you care to read back what you wrote c?

You ask and answer your own question....Not sure what you are drinking, but i'll have some!



cynic - 21 Apr 2014 20:24 - 39805 of 39806

it's just a really stupid and unwarranted comment
why on earth there isn't a stipulated quota of starter-price homes, i really do not know or even begin to understand, but that in no way correlates to or justifies your very silly comment
almost needless to say, the developers would much rather build houses to give the maximum return rather than lower value ones, but your haha-logic is (surprise surprise) totally preposterous

cynic - 21 Apr 2014 22:06 - 39806 of 81564

i know what i wrote .... "oiks" as you so disparagingly call those who want or need starter homes, do not remotely spoil the area, though the homes they need may well impact the developers bottom line

by the way, it was 1996 Pommard 1er Cru (Boillot) to go with the new season's roast shoulder of lamb

MaxK - 21 Apr 2014 23:52 - 39807 of 81564

You need to lay off the sauce c, cru or no, it messes with your reading ability.



"Unrealistic Section 106 agreements [which specify how many affordable homes should be built] result in no development, no regeneration and no community benefits," he added.

Haystack - 22 Apr 2014 00:33 - 39808 of 81564

Actually planning permission for developments often includes a stipulation of a proportion of social housing. It is not usually a high percentage as the developers won't go ahead with such a cut in their profit. It is interesting that the last government did not build any social housing even during the period when there was a boom in the economy,

VICTIM - 22 Apr 2014 07:57 - 39809 of 81564

It's a pretty sad state when an individual can't say that we're a Christian nation. Peter Tatchell yuck, makes me feel ill.

goldfinger - 22 Apr 2014 08:23 - 39810 of 81564

Its not what he said but the fact that its Cameron trying to win back votes from Ukipers after the gay vote.

Chris Carson - 22 Apr 2014 08:33 - 39811 of 81564

Hey GF........ Your silence on the football thread is deafening! Not one meant ion of "DAVEY IS OUR LEADER, DAVEY IS OUR LEADER!!!!" :O)

Chris Carson - 22 Apr 2014 08:36 - 39812 of 81564

Looks like "The Grim Reaper" job done at Goodison LOL!!!


Newcastle next stop for Moyes?

MaxK - 22 Apr 2014 08:41 - 39813 of 81564

Toast

goldfinger - 22 Apr 2014 08:42 - 39814 of 81564

Morning Chris, yep looks like Moyes is on his way, feel a little sorry for him really, Fergie knew he was handing over a team of pensioners.

Biggest factor is the board arent going to trust him spending 250million on the likes of Fellani, ex everton crap. And dont want that doderer at left back being brought in.

Best for the club a change, and a new face to lead the biggest and most famous football team in the World.

MaxK - 22 Apr 2014 08:49 - 39815 of 81564

VICTIM - 22 Apr 2014 08:50 - 39816 of 81564

I would think another few weeks and Rooney will start his usual I'm not happy routine. Man Utd answer = offer him more money.

goldfinger - 22 Apr 2014 08:52 - 39817 of 81564

Yep agree, shouldnt be anywhere near on 300 grand per week. far better strikers in the league on far less.

Chris Carson - 22 Apr 2014 08:52 - 39818 of 81564

Morning GF, sympathy for Moyes, Nahhh, his career choice! :O)

goldfinger - 22 Apr 2014 08:53 - 39819 of 81564

Fergie saw him coming.

Chris Carson - 22 Apr 2014 08:58 - 39820 of 81564

Wonder if Fergie will get a cut of Moyesys six million pound salary for ten months disaster. Davey laughing all the way to the bank will ease the pain :O)

VICTIM - 22 Apr 2014 09:05 - 39821 of 81564

I wonder if this is the end of the Fergie love in,they can't be happy with his choice. New man also means new backroom staff. Will we see Giggs and Co gone as well. They are also like every other club now, I you don't perform your gone.

Fred1new - 22 Apr 2014 09:11 - 39822 of 81564

Is there such thing as a football bubble?

If so, can it burst?
Register now or login to post to this thread.