Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


insiderinside - 13 May 2005 15:18 - 3992 of 27111

deancroft - 13 May'05 - 13:06 - 3985 of 3990

Apologies, but I cannot let the misrepresentation pass by. Previous reference to "Shocking news" and PVC is most unfounded and certainly not appropriate to this thread. Any reference to PVC and food contact equals poison/dioxins. The information in the post is correct but applies to the exterior of packaging that contains food related substances e.g sleeve material around the body of a bottle or bottle top. Sleeve materials lend themselves to be printed and shrunk into position. The use of PVC especially in the food industry is highly regulated. It gives off toxic gas if not disposed of correctly and harmful substances from the wrong type of PVC's can leach into food substances if in contact with such PVC. Certain PVC's are being withdrawn in hospital use where contact is possible with skin or intravenous substances. Where does any of this relate to biodegradeable substances in food packaging that SEO is advocating?? I would like to express my disgust at the continuing misuse of factual info on this thread and make a personal request to our moderators to either research this info for its suitability as I have been able to do so or be responsible in not allowing it to appear on this thread at all. Investors in SEO do so at their own risk, we are all over 18 and hopefully beyond the nanny stage. This is my formal request for you to dispatch our doom and gloom guardian before his efforts become more dire.


Well - you should know that PVC is commonly used in food packaging - and the regulations are in place and PVC has been changed - ever used cling film as an example - ever seen meat in a foam tray with PVC as the wrap on top ?
The article I referred to was that with the changes that have gone on PVC is in fact much improved now.

This extract from a 2005 report.

Some of the additives used in plastics are more likely to migrate than others. The main concern in the past has been in connection with plasticisers which are used to improve the flexibility of some packaging materials. They are used in a range of plastics but particularly in polyvinyl chloride (PVC) films. Since it was recognised that in many PVC food contact situations these plasticisers would migrate, the plastics industry has moved to reformulate various grades of "cling" films to reduce the likelihood of plasticiser migration. There is no evidence that concentrations of plasticiser found thus far in food constitute a risk to human health.

The biodegradeable aspect is that it is claimed that there is a requirement to change away from PVC and go to "more" biodegradable APET and other materials for wrap/lidding. The PVC industry has hit back at what they say is "an attack" on PVC and that PVC today is greatly changed. PVC is still widely used in food packaging - where you are right is that it is regulated more now.

There are two sides to every story and whilst some say PVC is bad others say no problem - Greenpeace would like to ban it completely in food packaging - but they also would like to ban many other things - which you may or may not concur with.

A little copy and paste for you -

PVC
Polyvinyl chloride. It is manufactured
by polymerizing vinyl chloride
monomer. Plasticizers must
be added to give it flexibility.
The structure of this polymer is
relatively tight, but some air will
pass through it. PVC has a heatdistortion
temperature of 1650F
and a maximum continuous service
temperature of 1500F. Because
its shrink and melt points
are so low, PVC can be used to
shrink wrap foods which tolerate
very little heat. It is resistant to
water, acid, bases, some solvents,
fats, and oils. PVC is approved
for use as the film to wrap fresh
red meats because it allows
enough air to pass through the
package to make the meat pigments
bloom bright red. PVC is
Prior Sanctioned for use in general
food contact applications.
The heat-sealing range is from 200
to 3500F. PVC is approved for irradiation
sterilization up to
1 megarad.

My comment was that certain people have been saying in other places that regulations exist or are pending to ban the use of PVC in its "non" biodegradable capacity - I do not see those regulations.

Please read the linked FSIS document and look for -

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/OA/pubs/meatpack.htm

PVC ("polyvinyl chloride")
replaced cellophane as the preferred meat wrapping used in supermarkets; a member of the vinyl family made from a compound found in petroleum. Low cost, protects against moisture loss, but has some oxygen permeability so it allows meat to "bloom" (stay red and fresh looking).

Shrink wrapping
plastic film that shrinks when heated, producing a tight, neat fit; the most popular form of grocery store meat packaging is PVC wrapping with foam trays.


Are you calling the US Food Safety and Inspection Service liars ????????????

insiderinside - 13 May 2005 15:20 - 3993 of 27111

Please try to post facts - I will answer all questions - with fact.

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 15:29 - 3994 of 27111

A nice steady trickle of buys for a friday afternoon.

Baza

driver - 13 May 2005 15:42 - 3995 of 27111

It looks like Don Q 2 has been got rid of because Don Q 1 is still there, shame he did seem a nice boy.
Never mind it wouldn't be a descent share with out its resident Share Basher.

BASHERS NEVER Bash A BAD STOCK

insiderinside - 13 May 2005 15:46 - 3996 of 27111

Ramp and spin is not required - orders - profits - revenue will drive a price up - if you have no orders no profit and no revenue - needs some ramp - spin - hype - jam tomorrow to get the price up.

Whats changed order - profit - revenue for SEO today ? Nothing - so what drove the price up a little bit - more ramp - spin - hype - tip ?

Always be wary of a stock rising against RSI !!

Jacks - 13 May 2005 15:53 - 3997 of 27111

Looking good today. Steady flow of buys. My 4 and 6p origianl buys at the start of last year look to have been an excellent investment. I have continued to top up and honestly believe the shares will reach 50p this year.The question many people are wondering is how far/ high the shares can go, there has been wild speculation from 1.50-5.00, personally I would be thinking of cashing in at anywhere around 1.00.

Chiva20 - 13 May 2005 15:53 - 3998 of 27111

I gain deep happiness from watching us all progressively get proved right on this stock. Bulls 1 : Bears 0

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 16:09 - 3999 of 27111

Now guys - lets not get carried away - even if it is the weekend

baza

Chiva20 - 13 May 2005 16:18 - 4000 of 27111

Baza its only because I've been proved wrong on virtually every other stock in the last two weeks. SEO keeps me sane

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 16:27 - 4001 of 27111

ok - let u off then - u r allowed to be happy

Baza

driver - 13 May 2005 16:32 - 4002 of 27111

Jacks
I have always maintained 150p within two years from Feb this year, but if some of the other products get going, and RF goes World wide the sp is any ones guess.

Jacks - 13 May 2005 16:41 - 4003 of 27111

Driver 150p would be fantastic and would make a major dent in the mortgage. More than 150p and I would be a hero at home and would expect some serious pampering. Andys would get his pipe and slippers out!!

Jacks - 13 May 2005 16:44 - 4004 of 27111

Felicity, are you still around? I am very sorry if I offended you. You sound very posh, I bet you are not used to industrial language.

driver - 13 May 2005 16:50 - 4005 of 27111

Jacks
I wouldn't mind a bit of pampering myself my other half thinks that I am obsessed with shares I probably am if the sp got to 20 I would still trade mind you it would be on a beach some where with a laptop, not in my spare room on a computer that is past its sell buy date.

driver - 13 May 2005 16:54 - 4006 of 27111

Jacks
I have never heard it called that before (industrial language) I thought what you used the other day was city language.

Jacks - 13 May 2005 17:02 - 4007 of 27111

Driver,
I know it was a bit strong. It's just a certain person never seems to get the message. We do not want to hear unfounded doom and gloom stories, if someone has a warning to post of substantiated evidence then let them post it, but please don't drone on about rubbish like he does.

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 17:04 - 4008 of 27111

I thought it was primary school language - judging by some of the comments that I hear in the streets these days

Baza

driver - 13 May 2005 17:28 - 4009 of 27111

Baza
You were young once, this hoody thing is a load of tosh to, I use to wear a duffel coat and that had a hood I wasn't banned from the shops.

Fred1new - 13 May 2005 17:37 - 4010 of 27111

Perhaps you should have been!!





8-)

bosley - 13 May 2005 17:49 - 4011 of 27111

i agree with banning gangs of hooded youths. the rise of the hoodie has coincided with the rise of arrests through cctv. the point of the hoodie is to hide the little tw*ts face so he can break your windows and cause havoc without fear of getting his face on cctv. it's not the hoodie i am against. it's the piece of sh*t within. teenagers should be banned!!!! ;)
Register now or login to post to this thread.