Gantenbrink
- 02 Oct 2003 13:58
Positive results the other day but price has dropped. Looks cheap now. DYOR
ajren
- 02 Oct 2003 18:29
- 4 of 18
Thanks for the detailed/informative reply.I am very busy as I work as a
full time day trader e.g.Wiggins below 1st Oct:4.75.I will research
it over the week-end and come back with more info.Perhaps others also
have info to put here.
Gantenbrink
- 03 Oct 2003 13:48
- 5 of 18
17 % up today as of a few minutes ago. I hope that my expectations are beginning to be realised.
Still money to made if they just get back to the 6p they were a couple of weeks ago which was before the positive interims. I can't see why they dropped in the first place unles the MMs were forcing it down in order to buy back in & strengthen their own holdings.
ajren
- 04 Oct 2003 12:41
- 6 of 18
CONGRATULATIONS:4.88 = +1.25/34.40 PER CENT PROFIT.
.......................
Buy/not buy now?At 4.20 max?Surely they will initially come down as
profit takers cash the 34.40 profit.Perhaps then go up as they re-buy + others
buy?
-------
I will not trade as could write 10 pages on the Negatives of pharmaceuticals-
learnt the hard way via Pfizers shares.However,I would buy now at a MAX of
3.50 - doubt if they come down-as a speculation.I think 95 per cent of
shares at 2.50/3.00 are good buys because there is almost no downside apart
from liquidation.
------
Writing now instead of Monday so you can-if you want-do some research b4 opening
I suggest you read,as below,and find NEGATIVES - so as to get a BALANCE.
-----
www.cenes.com---symbol=cen
www.moneyextra.com/stocks/LSE/CEN.Click:Company news
Useful:www.moneyextra.com/stocks/lookup/
www.nothing-ventured.com/mdata/summary.aspx?Epic=CEN.Type:cenes pharmacy.
www.uk.finance.yahoo.com/ Type cen:Click Tech analysis then Research.
www.cityequities.com : Join free--type cen.l and then add to favorites.
www.ft.com.See top Rt hand side-Take a TOUR + Join FREE ACCESS part and get
a number of items e.mailed every day to your e.mail address.
More WWWs but enough info to start with.
Best of luck if you trade.
ajren
- 11 Oct 2003 18:02
- 7 of 18
We - myself included - should have bought i.e.followed Gattenbrink.They
immediately-a few days-rose to 5.875.We all got into terrible comments over
penny shares b4 so perhaps we can just comment on the share this time Rgds ajren
ajren
- 11 Oct 2003 21:34
- 8 of 18
Sorry-mistake above.
I meant to add that obviously the gain is less than 34.40 because of Spread+
Generally,ALL my figures have to be adjusted but I never go into detailed
figures,etc writing these e.g.my 42 per cent profit on Corus was fractionally
less-41.23.Similarly,Morgan Stanleys 1,500,000 euro profit:700 per cent:was
proportionally less.
Also,90/95per cent of shares at 2.50/3.00 are good buys is obviously completely
excessive.If I had the time-and I do not-I would study all shares in this
price range.I know most of you keep away from these price shares.I am only
saying what I would do.I am Irish but live in Spain.In case the weather is
bad where you live and you want a holiday in a hot place.Perhaps you would like
to know we have had terrible thunderstorms and non-stop rain here for the
last few days.rgds.ajren
zzaxx99
- 12 Oct 2003 16:02
- 9 of 18
shares at 2.50/3.00 are good buys because there is almost no downside
Have to say that I think that statement is dangerously misleading. Consider: company X trades at 100/102 and you buy 1000; company Y trades at 3/3.5 and you buy 1000. Both companies issue a profit warning: Company X declines to 50/52; company Y goes to 1.5/2. The value of you holding in company X is now 500, whereas the value of your holding in company Y is now... 500.
I agree that the number of pence that a low-priced company can decline is limited, but in the vast majority of cases, that's irrelevant - it's the percentage difference between buy and sell that's important, not the number of pence (the exception being if you're spreadbetting at N/point, which you probably aren't on 3p/share companies). At 3p, a company can still decline 100%!
(Sorry ajren, I'm not looking to pick fights with you - we're just on opposing sides of a couple of disagreements)
zzaxx99
- 12 Oct 2003 16:05
- 10 of 18
A couple of other points (1) it's CeNeS pharmaceuticals, not pharmacy
(2) They had a number of good prospects (I haven't followed them for a couple of years, so don't know what the current situation is), but royally screwed over their shareholders about 18 months to 2 years ago with a deal that came close to wrecking the company.
They may now be a good prospect, but caveat emptor
ajren
- 13 Oct 2003 18:44
- 11 of 18
Hi zzaxx99,
Great to read your letters. DELIGHTED to read opposite views so as I get a
balance.Fights are in the past as none of us enjoy negative emotions and
they distract us from the goal of making money.
Perhaps my way needs explanation.
Most/all of you might think it idiotic but I make money.
I know I keep referring to Corus but I have written a lot about it so I will
continue.
ALL my figures here are ALWAYS approx
I bought at 8 and sold at 14
I,after considerable research,concluded that the downside risk was low and
the upside huge.I was waiting for 20p but decided-incorrectly-to exit.
I buy a share,make a profit and get out quickly.
........
Wiggins-as mentioned b4.They are 4.75 and I have 250,000.I have researched
them in great detail.My hope is they go up and I pocket a nice profit.However,
maybe they will go down.
I -sometimes-like Corus buy/sell in blocks of e.g.30,000 as it is often quite
easy to see a trend of up/down and then make the 15 second decisions.
rgds to all and hope we make money
ckmtang
- 14 Oct 2003 20:19
- 12 of 18
any further though of this compnay it drop a bit today? is it cheap to buy it now? It around 7.5p
ajren
- 15 Oct 2003 10:21
- 13 of 18
Good morning all.Please read my messages of Oct 2 and 4.i.e.I would have
bought as speculation @ 3.50 - now they are 100 per cent up.I did not buy
as no info.I am not interested in anything e.g.percentages.I buy a share at
x pence at sell at y pence.I would have bought at 3.5p as a calculated risk.
The company was not going into liquidation and was basically healthy enough
to support 2.00 p at the worst.Therefore,risk 1.5 p and upside @ 3.50p huge.The
general City consensus is that it is cheap at 7.5pHowever,I have no interest
as I lost a lot in Pfitzers which I bought at 32 dollors a share-Not penny
share. I now never buy pharmaceuticals - apart from speculative above.
Always remember the more it - any share-rises the greater the downside and
less upside.I suggest no one buys it.However,I think it will go up a lot.
tonyosb
- 15 Oct 2003 14:44
- 14 of 18
ajren, good spot in the first place.
However I am slightly confused by your last post, especially the "I suggest no one buys it", followed by "I think it will go up a lot"!
Also a good guide to fall back prices can be the amount of cash in such companies. With approx 8m in the bank this equates to approx 4p per share, so I think your 2p per share is a little on the low side.
The biotech sector seems to be recovering. More mergers and a few success stories in Alizyme and Acambis. Also article in the FT today about sector showing signs of life.
ajren
- 15 Oct 2003 22:57
- 15 of 18
ckmtang
- 15 Oct 2003 23:24
- 16 of 18
so does it mean now is not worth to buy to take a risk?
ajren
- 16 Oct 2003 13:50
- 17 of 18
ajren
- 16 Oct 2003 16:27
- 18 of 18
7.62p now
100+ per cent rise had I bought @ 3.5 p.This and Corus are typical of my
speculative buy - minimum downside/high upside - trading.However,I - like
everyone - back losers e.g.Rolls-Royce 6 months ago.I had bought for different
reasons.I made a small loss.If I had waited I would have made a huge profit.