One of the things we're looking at in Shares magazine is the FTSE 350 tables we carry. Are these useful or not? And if they are useful, are the stats we include the ones that readers want or would they prefer to see some other data?
At the moment, the data includes ebit, net profit, eps, pe ratio, dividend, NTA, gearing, return on equity and value over 1/3 yrs.
Any reader input would be welcome.

Jeremy Lacey, Editor

The tables are very useful but some of the data is unnecessary: whats the point of a value after 1,3 yrs? these arent unit trusts. Why have net profit & ebitda & EPS? anyone who wants to work out the net can do so. These figures should be in millions too as they look ridiculous when 9 digits long. Div yield and cover is sufficient, the actual payment is unnecessary. Some of the categories leave something to be desired, i.e. Centrica in the water category.

Thanks for the thoughts and suggestions everyone - if there are any more ideas they'll be most welcome. One hurdle I have to overcome with these tables is that the data is drawn from Datastream, which sometimes gives us a few rather suspicious numbers. It also means we don't have a lot of control over how the data is presented. This is something we may have to look at changing, which will mean starting the design of the tables again from scratch. Nice little job for me over the Christmas break.

All the best for Xmas and New Year - JL