Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Jacks - 13 May 2005 16:44 - 4004 of 27111

Felicity, are you still around? I am very sorry if I offended you. You sound very posh, I bet you are not used to industrial language.

driver - 13 May 2005 16:50 - 4005 of 27111

Jacks
I wouldn't mind a bit of pampering myself my other half thinks that I am obsessed with shares I probably am if the sp got to 20 I would still trade mind you it would be on a beach some where with a laptop, not in my spare room on a computer that is past its sell buy date.

driver - 13 May 2005 16:54 - 4006 of 27111

Jacks
I have never heard it called that before (industrial language) I thought what you used the other day was city language.

Jacks - 13 May 2005 17:02 - 4007 of 27111

Driver,
I know it was a bit strong. It's just a certain person never seems to get the message. We do not want to hear unfounded doom and gloom stories, if someone has a warning to post of substantiated evidence then let them post it, but please don't drone on about rubbish like he does.

bhunt1910 - 13 May 2005 17:04 - 4008 of 27111

I thought it was primary school language - judging by some of the comments that I hear in the streets these days

Baza

driver - 13 May 2005 17:28 - 4009 of 27111

Baza
You were young once, this hoody thing is a load of tosh to, I use to wear a duffel coat and that had a hood I wasn't banned from the shops.

Fred1new - 13 May 2005 17:37 - 4010 of 27111

Perhaps you should have been!!





8-)

bosley - 13 May 2005 17:49 - 4011 of 27111

i agree with banning gangs of hooded youths. the rise of the hoodie has coincided with the rise of arrests through cctv. the point of the hoodie is to hide the little tw*ts face so he can break your windows and cause havoc without fear of getting his face on cctv. it's not the hoodie i am against. it's the piece of sh*t within. teenagers should be banned!!!! ;)

EWRobson - 13 May 2005 17:56 - 4012 of 27111

Great day! Won my golf match with a 3ft putt which two circuits of the hole before dropping, followed by good meal with a quite reasonable Italian red. Find not only SEO but my other favourite, ASC, nicely up on the day. Bit funny that Bullshare squelched the wrong guy but not to worry. yes, some posts are over enthusiastic; others are downright negative and twist the basic facts. you can see through them. There are plenty of balanced posters on this thread. With an eye to people who might be wondering about the pros and cons, I would suggest you go back through the posts of andysmith. He knows his packaging; he is getting the feedback from people in the industry; he understands the process that ASDA and their suppliers are going through. The product is working well in its trials. If someone is trying to put a case against the research and conclusions of ASDA, best just to ignore them. If someone is arguing, for instance, that the sp has got ahead of itself, then that is worth discusssing. I argued myself on the PDX thread, when PDX was worth 120M and SEO 80m that PDX was over-priced and SEO under-priced.

So we come back to the question of value of a share. The value is where there is a balance between buyers and sellers. So Tom, the tipster extraordinaire, comes in with buy at 25p, with a 50p target, then I take it with a pinch of salt because it is not backed with a rational argument. If you want well worked forecasts then take Evolution's price target of 30p, that's enough to be going on with, or KBC Peel Hunt's statement that each order for 100 coversions equates to roughly 2.5p of share price, so the present price predicates 900 coversions. Tom, and Howard White, say that is conservative, as do Evolution. My personal view is that it is a low figure so that the downside is negligible. The upside is considerable. So ACCUMULATE a decent holding and await unfolding events.

Eric

driver - 13 May 2005 18:01 - 4013 of 27111

bos
What about sandals, what if you were an overweight, black, asylum seeking gay anarchist that wore a hoody and sandals.
Blimey bos you might be right.

bosley - 13 May 2005 18:09 - 4014 of 27111

BAN 'EM!!! BAN 'EM ALL!!!

bristlelad - 13 May 2005 18:20 - 4015 of 27111

hi bosley your second name isnot HOWARD by any chance/

Sequestor - 13 May 2005 18:33 - 4016 of 27111

driver , I made a similar comment on a "moneyam rival" bb, and got banned for being "racist",and "judgement" (sic) whatever that means, I told the censor to get some English lessons, that helped.

OOps sorry stick to the point, I have some SEO -only a punt which I either close next Thursday or buy, interesting week ahead.

driver - 13 May 2005 19:07 - 4017 of 27111

Sequestor
You should buy, I have ten times.
Just in case some one up above is monitoring I was being pro not anti.

I wouldn't want to end up like poor old or young Don Q 2 and get banned.

Sequestor - 13 May 2005 20:43 - 4018 of 27111

banned -lol!

- the chav term is `barred`, as on AFN- "your barred mate" (`yoo bawd mite`), nice to have a gent ` like Ian who talks the Queens English , as he bars one,

zscrooge - 13 May 2005 20:50 - 4019 of 27111

"so the present price predicates 900 coversions." (sic)

just so Eric. Predicates.

bosley - 13 May 2005 20:59 - 4020 of 27111

bristlelad, how did you know? first name is frankie:) driver , were you being pro banning little sh*ts from street corners?

a good week for seo. and a good week for bosley. first foray into the stress inducing world of cfds proved succesful , twice. as for seo, confirmation of a more than successful trial with youngs, a successful interview with rhps followed by a buy recommendation. next week, and i say this with absolute certainty, will either be a big yawn or there will be another rns.:)

Poverty - 13 May 2005 23:54 - 4021 of 27111

Hey you! - sandles are cool! I wear platform sandles when I've a mind to!

Good SEO week. Ready for the breakout to 7.50 next week.... Rah rah rah...

insiderinside - 14 May 2005 02:36 - 4022 of 27111

LOL - Great night out - going to have a headache when I wake up later this morning - got a couple of discussion topics coming up - which I am sure will add some spice to the debate over SEO - is it real or is it ramp-hype-spin-tip ?

insiderinside - 14 May 2005 03:03 - 4023 of 27111

A parting thought before I rest my weary eyes - as the RHPS report is pasted all over the web now and I have read it - it is full of "could" "maybe" "possible" type of things - but something caught my eye - in my report against spin.

At the time of the US engineer RNSs I made it quite clear this was pure spin.

HW says to TB (of RHPS) about last month's deals on engineers in the USA - that they were "quite misunderstood by the city".

Well - if you provide the ramp and spin team with little snippets like that - they will ramp and spin them into being things they are not - I therefore am confirmed in my opinion that this was deliberate spin knowing that the ramping team would use this - the ramping team linking to and making false rumours of Walmart signing soon.

Come on Howard - pull the other one - "quite misunderstood" indeed. I said at the time it was purely to allow the ramp-spin-hype team to make hay. It was the draw for my first comments on SE0 from where these RNS pushed the price up to 22p and it was all a misunderstanding in the city lovely tell the people presently buying in at these prices it was all misunderstanding.

In my opinion - RNSs from this lot are so full of spin - you need to read them 10 times and watch for bits missing - a change of word - a comma - anything that actually twists the meaning of something said before or after - or indeed some basic data that is missing altogether - or missing reference to base requirements to be able to judge a statement. This all feeds the rampers - spin - hype merchants.

My own opinion is that this total spin is quite vile - the rampers work on Buy on Rumour - Sell on real news and facts - why is there so much spin - so they can make many rumours to get people to put money in to SE0 to raise the level at which they exit before it all goes wrong - IMO.

A confirmation of such spin is the reported linking to PM1 site on the SE0 web site - (with a disclaimer to cover their bottoms that they do not monitor it and cannot be held responsible for what is on it) - why on earth would a company with such "confidence" need to resort to things like that - unless - unless - its all part of the game. Feeding the rumour - spin - hype perhaps.
Register now or login to post to this thread.