Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


driver - 16 May 2005 15:40 - 4095 of 27111

Share bashing can seriously damage your wealth.

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5028

bhunt1910 - 16 May 2005 15:45 - 4096 of 27111

Interesting - or not

If you look at the buy order for 100,000 shares at 15.03 - it adds 200,000 to the total

maybe not so interesting - but it does make you wonder whethet you can trust the additions at all

Baza

Sequestor - 16 May 2005 16:15 - 4097 of 27111

most share vols. are not to be trusted on LSE figs., many brokers use Swiss markets e.g., they don`t show here, I bgt. some SEO the other week and no sign
of them here, happens more and more often.

bosley - 16 May 2005 16:18 - 4098 of 27111

baza, it drops again by 100k straight after.

bhunt1910 - 16 May 2005 16:50 - 4099 of 27111

Yes Bos - I noticed that - but too wrongs dont make a right - what whats the odd 100,000 amongst friends - unless its mine!!

Baza

blackbelt - 16 May 2005 17:05 - 4100 of 27111

Its nice to see this one steady with new investors especially as they have probably came in on the back of rhps and trendwatch. Therefore their aspirations for SEO is more fitting for the long term strategy and not the herd who bump the price up by 2p to cash in that afternoon

Fred1new - 16 May 2005 17:09 - 4101 of 27111

Two sales of 500000 shares each.

blackbelt - 16 May 2005 17:29 - 4102 of 27111

The more "churn" of investors we get the better, so many people have made a packet on these so its only natural that many will bail out to liquidate funds.

bhunt1910 - 16 May 2005 17:52 - 4103 of 27111

The 2 sells of 500,000 look more like a matched buy and a sell through the sets system - doesn't it ?
It is unlikeely that the seller would have got a full 22.50 for that volume if he sold directly through a broker - similarly - the buyer has done well picking them up at less than the 22.85 he would have paid through a normal broker.

I guess I am asking the question?

Baza

bosley - 16 May 2005 17:52 - 4104 of 27111

seen that , fred, also saw that it didnt affect the price.

bosley - 16 May 2005 17:57 - 4105 of 27111

i've said it before and i'll say it again. i will never understand this shares lark. you get days when buys outweigh sells and the sp goes down . today , sells outweigh buys and the sp goes up. not the first time this has happened. tfc seemed to think this was a good thing. come to think of it, we haven't seen tfc for a while.

aldwickk - 16 May 2005 18:01 - 4106 of 27111

aldwickk - 16 May 2005 18:01 - 4107 of 27111

aldwickk - 16 May 2005 18:01 - 4108 of 27111

The first 500,000 was at 22.50, if it was a sell then the second 500,000 would not be a sell at 22.62, they would have dropped the price below 22.50 ?

aldwickk - 16 May 2005 18:04 - 4109 of 27111

Did not think it had clicked post reply first time so i tried again and again.

nickrichards - 16 May 2005 18:49 - 4110 of 27111

Hello Aldwick

re post 4079, I rang packagin Automation this afternoon and apparently Neil Ashton (the contact name on your post)was in a meeting. I spoke to a colleague of his who said that the news relates to a new development that is at least 12 months away. they could not say if it is in direct competition with SEO, it would be good if one of our more technical posters could ring and have a chat with them to get some accurate info to post here so that we have a reasoned analasys of potential competition. I am sure that a certain person on this thread will try to milk it for all he can in the most negative way,

Not once have I even contemplated selling through all of the ramblings and rants of someone on this thread, yet this post did worry me and I sold half of my holding. I know that this is a mistake and I shall be buying them back ASAP as the long term view of SEO is outstanding and I am happy that with the stable of products that they are developing they will increase my wealth over the next few years.

Regards

Nick

Fred1new - 16 May 2005 19:03 - 4111 of 27111

They could be sells. Maybe , maybe giving a little more on the size and /or have a known buyer. Anybody with level 2 viewing. (can't afford it myself. Overall volumes not that high.

markusantonius - 16 May 2005 19:16 - 4112 of 27111

On a wider note - since some European markets were closed today, trading volumes overall were generally very thin - with little guidance compared to normal. Good to see that SEO rose even slightly today. Bodes well for the future.

Nick, "Competition" is good for a no. of reasons and I don't see this as a negative. Also creates generic awareness and proof that the technology is well sought after. There are ways of getting around patents but SEO are still in the driving position. Probably easier for a Big Plc to try and buy them out rather than competete, in the short term. That would be great news for us, of course......

Sequestor - 16 May 2005 19:27 - 4113 of 27111

they were obviously a roll-over
500,000 sell @22.5p , followed in 12 secs by
a buy -500,000@22.62p
get a grip lads, its not hard- gave the mm 60.

bhunt1910 - 16 May 2005 21:05 - 4114 of 27111

Thank you Sequestor - I have but a simple brain

Baza
Register now or login to post to this thread.