bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
aldwickk
- 16 May 2005 18:01
- 4107 of 27111
aldwickk
- 16 May 2005 18:01
- 4108 of 27111
The first 500,000 was at 22.50, if it was a sell then the second 500,000 would not be a sell at 22.62, they would have dropped the price below 22.50 ?
aldwickk
- 16 May 2005 18:04
- 4109 of 27111
Did not think it had clicked post reply first time so i tried again and again.
nickrichards
- 16 May 2005 18:49
- 4110 of 27111
Hello Aldwick
re post 4079, I rang packagin Automation this afternoon and apparently Neil Ashton (the contact name on your post)was in a meeting. I spoke to a colleague of his who said that the news relates to a new development that is at least 12 months away. they could not say if it is in direct competition with SEO, it would be good if one of our more technical posters could ring and have a chat with them to get some accurate info to post here so that we have a reasoned analasys of potential competition. I am sure that a certain person on this thread will try to milk it for all he can in the most negative way,
Not once have I even contemplated selling through all of the ramblings and rants of someone on this thread, yet this post did worry me and I sold half of my holding. I know that this is a mistake and I shall be buying them back ASAP as the long term view of SEO is outstanding and I am happy that with the stable of products that they are developing they will increase my wealth over the next few years.
Regards
Nick
Fred1new
- 16 May 2005 19:03
- 4111 of 27111
They could be sells. Maybe , maybe giving a little more on the size and /or have a known buyer. Anybody with level 2 viewing. (can't afford it myself. Overall volumes not that high.
markusantonius
- 16 May 2005 19:16
- 4112 of 27111
On a wider note - since some European markets were closed today, trading volumes overall were generally very thin - with little guidance compared to normal. Good to see that SEO rose even slightly today. Bodes well for the future.
Nick, "Competition" is good for a no. of reasons and I don't see this as a negative. Also creates generic awareness and proof that the technology is well sought after. There are ways of getting around patents but SEO are still in the driving position. Probably easier for a Big Plc to try and buy them out rather than competete, in the short term. That would be great news for us, of course......
Sequestor
- 16 May 2005 19:27
- 4113 of 27111
they were obviously a roll-over
500,000 sell @22.5p , followed in 12 secs by
a buy -500,000@22.62p
get a grip lads, its not hard- gave the mm 60.
bhunt1910
- 16 May 2005 21:05
- 4114 of 27111
Thank you Sequestor - I have but a simple brain
Baza
bosley
- 16 May 2005 23:38
- 4116 of 27111
seo are in usa preparing to pitch to walmart against whatever competition there is out there, the same as they did here in the uk. i would imagine every tom, dick and harry has pitched to asda , tesco and all the major supermarkets. i always think it's best to listen to the people who matter in situations like this.
Tony Ruane, Technical Manager, Meal Solutions category at ASDA said:
'This is a first to market for ASDA and a significant milestone in our
partnership with Stanelco. ASDA is delighted with the progress of the trials so
far. The environmental benefits of the technology are immense and we are looking
forward to working with Stanelco to widen the reach of RF packaging in the
coming months to other parts of our business. '
and
Tony Ruane, Technical Manager, Meal Solutions category at ASDA said:
'This is a first to market for ASDA - real innovation. This could well turn out
to be the biggest thing in packaging for years. The benefits for both the
environment, our customers and suppliers from this technology are far reaching.
The potential for the use of Stanelco's technology grows every time we look at
it. Every visit to both stores and suppliers identifies new areas and ways in
which the technology can be used. We are looking forward to working with
Stanelco.'
also
Tony Ruane, Technical Manager at ASDA said:
'The benefits are now proving to be substantially beyond our original thinking
and as a result we will look to accelerate the introduction of this technology
to full scale commercial production."
'nuff said, i think.
insiderinside
- 17 May 2005 01:02
- 4117 of 27111
Interesting that yesterday all the largest trades were sells - and most buys were just small - looks like the ramp is sucking the small holders in whilst the big ones depart slowely a bit at a time -
Largest Trades
Date Price Volume Value Buy/Sell
16/05 22.62p 500,000 113,125 Sell O
16/05 22.50p 500,000 112,500 Sell O
16/05 22.75p 434,500 98,849 Unknown P
16/05 22.25p 311,974 69,414 Sell O
16/05 22.55p 200,000 45,100 Sell O
016622
- 17 May 2005 08:05
- 4118 of 27111
I trust you shorted a few ... and are dreaming of the next luxury holiday??
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 08:08
- 4119 of 27111
Morning all - what a womnderful day - the sun is shining, the sky is Blue - lets hope SEO follows suit
Baza
bosley
- 17 May 2005 08:22
- 4120 of 27111
morning baza. same here. beautiful day. might even venture out onto the golf course aagain. i was very encouraged by yesterday. normally, after a rise, the price usually gets walked down when there is no news but yesterday we stayed nice and steady. hoping for another steady day today.
superrod
- 17 May 2005 08:40
- 4121 of 27111
ii
ill risk the fine......
as already stated by sequestor, the 2 500k trades were a rollover ( sell and buy back ), the 434k is unknown, which leaves just 512k sells, NOT nearly 2million.
jimmy b
- 17 May 2005 08:42
- 4122 of 27111
His last post was what you call GETTING DESPERATE..
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 09:00
- 4123 of 27111
Morning Superrod
I'll just issue a caution instead as its such a nice day. I am feeling generous
Baza
insiderinside
- 17 May 2005 09:54
- 4124 of 27111
Come on superrod - did you read that on the LSE web site - regardless of the confidence of trades and that nobody knows what is a sell or buy - we would like to clarify that the SE0 500Ks were rollovers - LOL - in your dreams - another little tactic to keep the people happy and let them think it was not sells.
Newbies - all trades are confidential - nobody knows if they were buys or sells - only basis is taking the mid price and above is a buy and below a sell.
Two big trades below the mid price were "sells" and the crew are trying to tell you not to worry - they were not really "sells". LOL.
Anyone who can point to an official web site that clarifies 100% whether trades were buys or sells - please step forward.
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 10:05
- 4125 of 27111
Desperate Housewives springs to mind -
Baza
hewittalan6
- 17 May 2005 10:09
- 4126 of 27111
All trades are confidential. So you have absolutely no right to ridicule other peoples interpretation of trades while presenting your own as gospel truth carved in tablets of stone. Anyone who can point to why one person has absolute knowledge where no-one else has, please step forward.
Alan