goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 22 May 2014 16:48
- 41148 of 81564
shame on you .... a postal vote is no effort at all
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 16:50
- 41149 of 81564
Yep just looked in weekend supplement local Elections.
Wont be so good then.
Give pointers I suppose......like early interest rate rise, he he.
doodlebug4
- 22 May 2014 17:01
- 41151 of 81564
Haystack, if you don't vote then you lose the right to moan or comment on the results! I don't care who you vote for - just do it. :-)
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:07
- 41152 of 81564
If I vote it will be a spoilt paper as I don't like the whole MEP business.
For a few years I was deliberately not on the electoral roll to avoid jury service. It is a pain to have to do jury service when you run a business. I managed to get out of it twice with a lot of effort but got fed up with being asked.
cynic
- 22 May 2014 17:13
- 41153 of 81564
you should be ashamed ..... you clearly want to live in a democracy, appear to be a political activist, but seem not to be prepared to honour the principles on which this system is built
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:18
- 41154 of 81564
I vote in council elections and General Elections but not EU.
I am also not in favour of jury trials. Trusting 12 idiots to come to the right verdict does not seem a good idea.
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:21
- 41155 of 81564
Well if that was the case and I dont doubt it Hays, it goes down on your Credit Check with Experian and the other 2 and would have meant you wouldnt have been able to get any new credit or a mortgage for 6 years at least, until re-signing up on the electoral roll.
I know you probably dont want these facilities BUT you never know.
A lot of these ruffians who have debt outstanding do the same thing to try and avoid having thier collar felt but in time they are caught.
Some employers even use (credit check) it when checking your CV details.
I make sure I fill it in immediatly on my PC.
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:24
- 41156 of 81564
gf
That was many years in the past and at a different address. In fact several previous addresses. I got out of jury service once by supplying loads of documentation about a project with lots of staff depending on me. The next time, I wrote a letter saying that I did not approve of jury trials and would feel obliged to find an accused innocent on that basis.
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:27
- 41157 of 81564
MAY 21, 2014
Leading Law Firm Slams ‘Exploitative’ Zero-Hours Contracts
Leading law firm, Thompson Solicitors, has slammed ‘exploitative’ zero-hours contracts and the coalition government’s “sham” consultation exercise into the use of the controversial employment contracts.
Thompsons Solicitors say zero-hours contracts provide no guarantee of work and can trap people into working for a single employer with ‘exclusivity’ clauses.
People trapped on zero-hours contracts have no idea how many hours they will be required to complete. Consequently, employees have no clear indication on how much they will be paid from week to week.
The law firm say the contracts prevent parents from planning family activities, and organising childcare, because zero-hours employees can be called into work at a moments notice on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis. This widespread ‘exploitation’ which ‘gives people no choice’ needs to be tackled, say Thompsons.
Thompsons say that government’s consultation into zero-hours contracts ‘proposes no effective solution’, and that employers should be able to achieve flexibility without needing to resort to contracts which seek to ‘exploit’ desperate jobseekers.
Responding to the consultation, Thomsons said that ‘exclusivity clauses’, which prevent zero-hours employees from working elsewhere, should be banned entirely. Not all zero-hours contracts include exclusivity clauses.
They also say that all zero-hours contracts should provide the same ‘basic employment rights’ already included in other contractual arrangements.
Workers should also be able to demand a “traditional contract” after a set period on a zero-hours contract. Thompsons claim that this right could be ‘introduced under the Part-time Workers Directive‘.
Zero-hours employees “on call” should also be protected by existing National Minimum Wage Legislation, which Thompsons say would help discourage employers from exploiting workers.
Thompsons Chief Executive Stephen Cavalier said:
“People on zero hours contracts have no guaranteed income and no certainty of when or whether they will be working. They cannot plan their lives, organise childcare or take on commitments. They are forced to accept zero hours contracts on a ‘take it or leave it’ basis. They have no real choice. It is exploitation that needs to be tackled.
“There should be zero tolerance of these exploitative contracts; abuses should be tackled. The government should outlaw zero hours contracts which tie workers to an employer with no guarantee of either work or pay.
“These five measures for reform will put an end to the abuse of zero hours contracts and, if implemented, would be a real signal from the government that they are taking low paid workers and their families seriously.
“There are too many families in the UK living below the poverty line. For the first time, more than half of those in poverty in the UK are working families. Unless urgent action is taken to tackle zero hours contracts, that situation will only get worse.”
Source – Welfare News Service,
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:30
- 41158 of 81564
Bit of a Jack The Lad you Hays, but I know what you mean as my late father who was self employed got caught and had to do 3 weeks and the compensation was miserly.
Worse still with being a sole trader it didnt help his business.
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:32
- 41159 of 81564
gf
More cuts and paste from that silly vox blog. They are just talking about exploitative zero hours contracts which all parties are against.
cynic
- 22 May 2014 17:36
- 41160 of 81564
personal views are fine but i think it worse than unprofessional for a firm of solicitors of any rank (never heard of these guys) to take a political stance
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:40
- 41161 of 81564
Its not from VOX.
Its from Welfare News Service recognised by the DSS.......and IDS.
He might have it on his blog but Ive got it direct from above.
Anyway the company are right about the exploitation.
Remember this when the down turn comes Zero hours contracts wont exist anymore, all of them will be sacked immidieatly. In fact they wont be sacked, they just wont ever hear from their employer again.
2.5 million aded to the unemployment figures overnight.
aldwickk
- 22 May 2014 17:45
- 41162 of 81564
I am surprised at how many people who don't bother to vote in any elections before are voting today for UKIP
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:50
- 41163 of 81564
gf
The same would happen in a downturn even if normal employment.
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:51
- 41164 of 81564
Bedroom Tax Was Never About Freeing Up Housing
20/05/2014
I knew it You knew it and the people faced with ‘Bedroom Tax’ knew it!!!!!!
The BEDROOM TAX was not about freeing up houses at all. It was simply about saving money!!!!
Never mind all those poor souls that have moved and now regret doing such!!
Please take time to watch, and listen very carefully to PMQs on Weds 14th May. (27mins 30secs in)
Cameron was asked by Jonathon Reynolds MP
“As the Prime Minister has acknowledged, the number of people who are in work but who have to claim housing benefit to make ends meet is growing, but the cost of that will be an extra £5 billion over the course of this Parliament. Does the Prime Minister consider that a sign of success?”
To which Cameron replied: “……. in order to make savings housing benefit should not be paid in respect of spare rooms that people are not using….” the key words there being IN ORDER TO MAKE SAVINGS.
For the last 18 months Cameron, McVey, IDS and co have been banging on about how their beloved ‘spare room subsidy’ will free up homes for Families. They insist on repeating that line.
I for one believe that no one should ever be put in a position of being made to leave their HOME. However, as I only said to my own MP last week, ” …….if the Bedroom Tax were about freeing up homes for families, then they would have included Pensioners…” to which I was met with silence. No answer!!
Keep talking Mr Cameron and slowly but surely you will drop right in to that big hole come General Election 2015.
We the People are watching, and listening. We are WAKING UP!!!
Haystack
- 22 May 2014 17:54
- 41165 of 81564
Good. The right reason.
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 17:55
- 41166 of 81564
Haystack - 22 May 2014 17:50 - 41165 of 41166
gf
The same would happen in a downturn even if normal employment....................ENDS
WRONG, employees had contracts with their employers before the Tories came to power. Contracts i might had that would have meant redundancy payments to most.
Zero Hours Contracts mean just that...........ZERO.
goldfinger
- 22 May 2014 18:01
- 41167 of 81564
Hays you mean Camoron as put his foot in it again and now will face another committee.
How many more. !!!!!!