bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
insiderinside
- 17 May 2005 01:02
- 4117 of 27111
Interesting that yesterday all the largest trades were sells - and most buys were just small - looks like the ramp is sucking the small holders in whilst the big ones depart slowely a bit at a time -
Largest Trades
Date Price Volume Value Buy/Sell
16/05 22.62p 500,000 113,125 Sell O
16/05 22.50p 500,000 112,500 Sell O
16/05 22.75p 434,500 98,849 Unknown P
16/05 22.25p 311,974 69,414 Sell O
16/05 22.55p 200,000 45,100 Sell O
016622
- 17 May 2005 08:05
- 4118 of 27111
I trust you shorted a few ... and are dreaming of the next luxury holiday??
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 08:08
- 4119 of 27111
Morning all - what a womnderful day - the sun is shining, the sky is Blue - lets hope SEO follows suit
Baza
bosley
- 17 May 2005 08:22
- 4120 of 27111
morning baza. same here. beautiful day. might even venture out onto the golf course aagain. i was very encouraged by yesterday. normally, after a rise, the price usually gets walked down when there is no news but yesterday we stayed nice and steady. hoping for another steady day today.
superrod
- 17 May 2005 08:40
- 4121 of 27111
ii
ill risk the fine......
as already stated by sequestor, the 2 500k trades were a rollover ( sell and buy back ), the 434k is unknown, which leaves just 512k sells, NOT nearly 2million.
jimmy b
- 17 May 2005 08:42
- 4122 of 27111
His last post was what you call GETTING DESPERATE..
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 09:00
- 4123 of 27111
Morning Superrod
I'll just issue a caution instead as its such a nice day. I am feeling generous
Baza
insiderinside
- 17 May 2005 09:54
- 4124 of 27111
Come on superrod - did you read that on the LSE web site - regardless of the confidence of trades and that nobody knows what is a sell or buy - we would like to clarify that the SE0 500Ks were rollovers - LOL - in your dreams - another little tactic to keep the people happy and let them think it was not sells.
Newbies - all trades are confidential - nobody knows if they were buys or sells - only basis is taking the mid price and above is a buy and below a sell.
Two big trades below the mid price were "sells" and the crew are trying to tell you not to worry - they were not really "sells". LOL.
Anyone who can point to an official web site that clarifies 100% whether trades were buys or sells - please step forward.
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 10:05
- 4125 of 27111
Desperate Housewives springs to mind -
Baza
hewittalan6
- 17 May 2005 10:09
- 4126 of 27111
All trades are confidential. So you have absolutely no right to ridicule other peoples interpretation of trades while presenting your own as gospel truth carved in tablets of stone. Anyone who can point to why one person has absolute knowledge where no-one else has, please step forward.
Alan
jimmy b
- 17 May 2005 10:10
- 4127 of 27111
There have been bigger sells than that over the last few weeks and there have been bigger buys, also a lot of day traders trade this stock as they do every stock that fluctuates, wait until the deals are done and watch the sp fly , im firmly hanging on to mine..
bosley
- 17 May 2005 10:26
- 4128 of 27111
as driver likes to point out, for every seller there is a buyer. even if they were sells it didn't affect the price one bit. it's good to see smaller investors getting into seo now. the more people who buy and hold means less stock out there.
jimmy b
- 17 May 2005 11:01
- 4130 of 27111
Someones posts are now becoming desperate , they are all the same copy paste , copy paste,copy paste, over to the other bb copy paste , i wonder if these people will give me a job, ill get my son to do it in the holidays..
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 11:11
- 4131 of 27111
JimmyB -thats an insult to your son. Purile, churlish springs to mind
Baza
bosley
- 17 May 2005 11:17
- 4132 of 27111
baza, jimmyb, please don't take this the wrong way, but, who gives a flying f**k what he says. i keep seeing his name posting and it's not made a blind bit of difference to the sp, which has consistantly risen!! filter him. he has no point.
bosley
- 17 May 2005 11:32
- 4134 of 27111
yeah! he should fork off!!
bhunt1910
- 17 May 2005 11:34
- 4135 of 27111
was that fork handles or four candles?
Absolutely right - I squelched him long ago - but the smell still lingers
Baza
driver
- 17 May 2005 11:34
- 4136 of 27111
Last week eric asked for suggested figures on Frogpack, this is from another board, its a good post.
FrogPack is going to make SEO worth 50p a share ON IT'S OWN !!!!
That's why we are using an aggressive advertising campaign in the USA !!!!
FrogPack is a 'Protective Mailer' in the USA
The figures below ARE FOR USA ONLY !!!!
Protective Packaging to 2008
Publication Date: 01-MAR-04
Format: PDF
Delivery: Immediate Online Access
Pages: 188
Study #: 1781
Price: $3,900.00 Sections: from $30.00
Description
Protective packaging demand in the US will grow 5.2 percent annually through 2008. Gains will be driven by accelerating Internet and mail order catalog sales and specialized packaging requirements in the electronics, medical and other industries. Inflatable bags, insulated shipping containers, polyolefin rolls and molded foam will see the best growth.
This study analyzes the $2.7 billion US protective packaging industry. It presents historical demand data (1993, 1998 and 2003) and forecasts to 2008 and 2013 by product (e.g., molded foams, foamed-in-place, foam rolls, protective mailers, insulated shipping containers, paperboard protectors, loose-fill, inflatable bags); by material, function (e.g., cushioning, blocking and bracing, void-fill, insulation); and by market.
The study also examines the US market environment, details industry structure, presents company market share data, and profiles 39 leading industry competitors including Sealed Air, Pactiv, and SCA Packaging North America.
Extract from the Fredonia report above, on the PPFC Online Website
Protective mailer trends: demand will rise 4.7 percent/yr. to $1 billion (US) in 2006