markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
TheFrenchConnection
- 29 Mar 2010 01:54
- 4137 of 6492
Basically Prose. thats part of my very point...Long term -This is merely the start of what is a pretty intensive drilling programme scheduled for drilling a number of leads , so why would anyone sell now ? .lts like leaving the match after your team goes down by a goal after 10 minutes / l believe that each,and every time, a well is on the cusp of a result the s/p will rise to about the same levels as now anyway . But we live in an age of Jam today.So short term - lf news is to be believed the s/p will be adversely affected - the damage is done. Even shorters will find margins on premiums restrictive .With not having held stock for over 4 years and having not properly researched DES during that time i am left pondering what would be a good trading entry point ....gut instinct says 50/55p ..but something tells me it will bounce before that level...and as drilling continues it will slowly creep back up to current level,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Proselenes
- 29 Mar 2010 02:52
- 4138 of 6492
FC - agreed.
The Times article is in fact quite clever to only mention LIZ and reference everything to LIZ whilst avoiding any mention of BETH.
Desire shareholders will know that BETH is the lower target and would be drilled into if LIZ fails to hold large charges of oil (we might find LIZ contains gas).
So the Times writer has perhaps deliberately avoided mentioning BETH so as to attempt to write "failure" all over the 1st drill, even though we all know that BETH would be drilled into if LIZ fails, as the company stated that it expected either LIZ or BETH to hold oil, but not both of them. He can hide behind only LIZ being the 1st target and avoid mention of BETH.
So from a technical standpoint, the writer could claim that LIZ (and not BETH) was the 1st drill/target and therefore his "flop" claim is correct, even if they are now drilling down into BETH (as he only mentions LIZ being a flop).
A bit crude and perhaps the mention of stock price falls later in the article gives the game away as to the desired effect of this kind of reporting and ignoring of the details and the lower BETH prospect.
I would laugh if this is the case, and all that has happened is that they are now drilling into BETH as LIZ contains gas or not enough oil.
BETH is a bit smaller than LIZ but still could be very large upside.
Stop speculating and wait for the RNS........ tells to self ;)
robertalexander
- 29 Mar 2010 07:08
- 4139 of 6492
For immediate release 29 March 2010
Desire Petroleum plc
("Desire" or "the Company")
Drilling Update
Due to recent press speculation, Desire Petroleum wishes to announce that the Liz 14/19-1 well, in the North Falkland Basin, has reached a depth of 3570 metres and logging is underway.
The primary Liz target was encountered at around 2550 metres with indications of hydrocarbons while drilling. Subsequent logging operations have shown that oil may be present in thin intervals but that reservoir quality is poor. Wireline sampling is still to be carried out. Deeper gas shows have also been encountered while drilling, particularly below 3400 metres and these have still to be evaluated by wireline logging and sampling.
Until the logging is complete and the results analysed it will not be possible to determine the significance of the hydrocarbons encountered and whether the well will need to be drilled deeper, suspended for testing or plugged and abandoned.
Operations are expected to be completed later this week when a full announcement will be made.
For further information please contact:
Desire Petroleum plc
020 7436 0423
Stephen Phipps, Chairman
Dr Ian Duncan, Chief Executive Officer
Seymour Pierce Limited
020 7107 8000
Jonathan Wright
Christopher Wren
Buchanan Communications
020 7466 5000
Tim Thompson
Chris McMahon
Is this good or bad? and if bad how bad? anyone any ideas on SP at 0800?
poo bear
- 29 Mar 2010 07:41
- 4140 of 6492
Not too great for this well, but they are still evaluating and drilling possibly sounds like there may be better gas than oil if anything commercially.
As far as other prospects, the chances are increased as this well proves working petroleum systems do exist in the South Falklands basin.
So, this news is pretty good overall.
Balerboy
- 29 Mar 2010 07:45
- 4141 of 6492
Rose tinted specs poo...
poo bear
- 29 Mar 2010 07:51
- 4142 of 6492
No because I don't hold but I can read.
poo bear
- 29 Mar 2010 07:56
- 4143 of 6492
Just like all football supporters there are those who do and those who don't and won't under any circumstances view anything positive about a team they decide to dislike or just be jealous of.
Before we know it there will be violence on the streets as rival supporters meet and decide to settle their differences in the usual primeval fashion.
poo bear
- 29 Mar 2010 08:05
- 4145 of 6492
Actually Mark, they do!
For testing when they have other prospects to drill in the same geological environment.
cynic
- 29 Mar 2010 08:07
- 4147 of 6492
strewth ..... you could genuinely have bought at about 43 before shares were suspended again .... did not expect that bad a hammering
suzban600
- 29 Mar 2010 08:11
- 4148 of 6492
I agree with you TheFrenchConnection 4135 let the rollercoaster carry on. I maybe one of the buyers if the price is right. Never risk what you can not afford to lose that's my strategy. just tried to get a price from my broker and they say sorry not at this time try agian later .
robertalexander
- 29 Mar 2010 08:13
- 4149 of 6492
markymar,
i agree just trying to decide on which to buy RKH or DES?
required field
- 29 Mar 2010 08:13
- 4150 of 6492
God......agghhh !....what a drop...
cynic
- 29 Mar 2010 08:16
- 4151 of 6492
DES is still suspended, but RKH tradeable and offered at 31
acw
- 29 Mar 2010 08:19
- 4152 of 6492
whats happened to des? why the drop?
Balerboy
- 29 Mar 2010 08:21
- 4153 of 6492
we're all doomed, doomed I say....... RKH best bet now..
aldwickk
- 29 Mar 2010 08:22
- 4155 of 6492
acw
Is that a sick joke ?
required field
- 29 Mar 2010 08:27
- 4156 of 6492
80p I said and it drops to below 40p...hell....