Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Tony Blair is a working class hero.

i can see you blushing from here :-)

Well said cynic , i have nothing to add , actually i could add about 10 000 more words as to why he was a slimeball but couldn't be bothered to waste my fingertips ...

Not to mention his wife's charity work ?

Although the "Big Bang" eased stock market transactions

I think it did a lot more then that

Manuel,

I thought Blair had a similar indoctrination as the rest of the tory elite.

Cameron could be old school friends of yours.

=======

They are a variety if JAs and when young far better.

Mind an old fart like yourself in with early dementia set in you probably would not notice the difference.

A supporter of Ukip ? in Newark – where MEP Roger Helmer is standing in next week’s crucial by-election, despite a very prominent row over homophobia – has claimed that same-sex marriage is “appalling” and will lead to people “marrying pigs”.

Huff post / AOL
Are so anti UKIP that they have to find just one surporter of UKIP out of all the many thousand's and make an whole page artical out of it .

Our voting system is flawed, but politicians don’t seem to care

In the push for ever wider 'engagement’ with the electorate, integrity is being lost




Many polling stations in Tower Hamlets tried to encourage people to vote the 'right' way Photo: Reuters


Charles Moore
By Charles Moore

8:50PM BST 30 May 2014

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/local-elections/10865271/Our-voting-system-is-flawed-but-politicians-dont-seem-to-care.html



When we voted for the European elections in our village last week, both my wife and I forgot our polling cards. We were not asked to produce them or any other means of identification. No tellers sat outside the polling station. It felt nice that the democratic process could be so relaxed.


It was not like that for the voters of Tower Hamlets in London. Outside many polling stations, it seems – and in some cases, inside them – large numbers of supporters of the Tower Hamlets First party and its mayoral candidate, Lutfur Rahman, gathered to encourage people to vote the “right” way. Such gatherings are against electoral law, and protests were duly made, but although the police were present, they did nothing. Mr Rahman was elected mayor and, after four and a half days of chaotic counting, the council results were finally settled. Tower Hamlets First increased their representation to 18 councillors (only one woman, all Muslim). According to the local Labour MP, Jim Fitzpatrick, the authorities responsible – Tower Hamlets Council and the Electoral Commission – “don’t seem to be able to deliver a clean election”.


Tower Hamlets has been a problem for many years, but its controversies are not unique. There have been cases of electoral malpractice in Birmingham, Bradford, Slough, Woking, Peterborough. There are also serious problems, particularly in big cities, with the Electoral Register. If you compare the register with the contemporary census, you will find a difference of millions – millions who are at different addresses from those registered, and millions more who are not on the electoral register at all – much higher numbers than in the past.


Richard Mawrey QC is a judge and an Election Commissioner. He is consistently scathing about how badly our voting arrangements work. In his judgment on Woking in 2012 (where a Liberal Democrat called Mohammed Bashir was convicted of corrupt practices, including registering “ghost” voters), the judge praised the returning officer as being “an honest man called on to operate a dishonest system”. In the Slough case, he said that “to ignore the problem that [fraud] is widespread, particularly in local elections, is a policy even an ostrich would despise”. His main point is that our newish law permitting postal voting on demand is “wide open to fraud”.


There are two reasons for this – forgery and coercion. The first has now been mitigated by insisting on postal voters giving a signature and a date of birth (in Tower Hamlets this time, no fewer than 10 per cent of the postal votes returned were rejected because of discrepancies in this area). The second flourishes, particularly in minority ethnic communities, where leaders can exploit clan or family ties to “harvest” votes from their juniors and from women.



Our modern democratic system dates from 1872 when the secret ballot was introduced. The modern system of unrestricted postal voting almost reverses that great step forward. After the 1872 Act, voting became a private act, performed in public. Today, in postal voting, it is all too often a public act, though performed in private. There is no protection of its secrecy and therefore nothing to stop its manipulation. Another big problem is “personation” – voting at the polling station as someone else. It is actually illegal to ask a voter to produce proof of identity at the poll, so personation is well-nigh undetectable.

You would have thought politicians would be worried. They are rightly alarmed by public disillusionment with politics. If the nuts and bolts of democracy shake loose, that disillusionment will be complete. Yet the parties seem to be facing the other way. All of them voted for the extension of postal voting. They seem obsessed with the question of “engagement” – getting more people to take part. They neglect the integrity of the process itself.

Graham Allen MP, the chairman of the relevant parliamentary select committee, recently wrote a protest to Mr Mawrey for giving his opinion on the poor state of affairs. Mr Allen accused him of “political assertion without evidence” and referred his case to the Chairman of the Judges’ Council.


The Electoral Commission is the body supposed to ensure that all is well with British voting. But if you look at its remit and pronouncements, you will see that it focuses more on engagement than on making votes trustworthy. In a speech in March, its chairman, Jenny Watson, seemed preoccupied with the need to “modernise”. “As a society, we are at risk,” she said clumsily, “of how we ask people to engage with our electoral system… becoming increasingly disconnected from how they interact with both each other and with other institutions, from their banking arrangements to their weekly shop.” The system needed to be “more reflective of the wider society”. She said how nice it would be if people could register to vote on the actual day of the election. She played down issues of fraud. She praised the work of pressure groups, such as Operation Black Vote (OBV), which try to get new voters. She did not praise anyone who checks that registered voters are true ones.

Miss Watson is right that we expect things to be quicker nowadays, but if you think about it, modern society actually makes far more demands for proof of identity than in the past. Try getting on an internal flight, or buying a drink if you are young, or hiring a car, to see what I mean. Some of this is irksome, but the essential point is that the transaction matters, and so it should be accurate and legal. Jenny Watson mentioned banking. Would it be good if you could walk in, or write off, to demand a bank account and get one without proving who you were? No, but you can get the vote that way.

The board of the Electoral Commission is stuffed with the usual public-sector princes and princesses who rule modern life. Miss Watson herself is a director of Wrap (Waste and Resources Action Programme), and was the last Chair of the Equal Opportunities Commission and campaign director for Charter88.


I looked up Operation Black Vote on its website, which it subtitles “The Home of Black Politics”. (Imagine what Jenny Watson would say if there were a website called “The Home of White Politics”.) Its lead “News” item praises Lutfur Rahman for his “unprecedented victory” in Tower Hamlets “despite every dirty trick in the book used against him”.

I notice OBV was established by “black volunteers” at Charter88 in the year Miss Watson joined the organisation. Obviously she cannot control what OBV says today, but this impermeable circle of politically correct, self-reinforcing organisations undermines one’s confidence. Is there any issue involving ethnic minorities in which the wider needs of the democratic process and administrative rigour will get a hearing? Does our entire voting system have to be laid open to abuse for fear of causing offence to a few?

When I was a boy in the Sixties, my father was a Liberal candidate in Northern Ireland. The division of the tribes there made the voting process deeply corrupt, even including voting in the name of the dead. I remember one man telling my father that he had voted 90 times for the Unionists at the previous election and would be happy to do the same for him on this occasion. (Sadly, he refused.)

Nowadays, to guard against this dark past, Northern Ireland is the only part of the United Kingdom which has strict electoral laws carefully invigilated. The rest of the country has allowed its most basic public service to decay. An electoral system without clean voting quickly becomes like a hospital with MRSA.

If you like tennis, there is on ITV 4, Murray at the French open at 5 all in the fifth set!

Did he lose????????. If yes he should never have got rid of that ex coach.

It became too dark. They halted at 7 all until tomorrow.

Excuse me, are we talking about the guy in football terms as saying ANYONE BUT ENGLAND! He's a Scot for fuck sake! British till September I await with bated breath :O)

I certainly don't want England to win the World Cup even though I am English. The English are good losers but terrible winners. We still say endlessly that 1966 was our finest hour and there have been hundreds of replays of the final. If we won again it would be terrible. We would have breast beating for years. When the next WC came round again there would be endless speculation about whether there would be a chance of winning for a third time. Far better to lose gracefully early on and then enjoy watching the competition and the better teams.

Update - Labour lead at 3
by YouGov in Politics
Sun June 1, 2014 6 a.m. BST

Latest YouGov / Sunday Times results 30th May - Con 33%, Lab 36%, LD 7%, UKIP 15%

It is interesting that there are news items are saying that UKIP will keep their rise in popularity in the GE but polls are still showing the same percentage for the GE.

This is all pointing to the EU election being a temporary thing and due to the low turnout distorting the figures with the pro UKIP voters being more determined to vote. In fact the ones who voted for UKIP in the EU elections may be the sum total of all UKIP voters that there are including the temporary protest voters. If that is the case, then the poll above giving UKIP 15% is probably right and they will come nowhere in the GE.

Murray through to next round with 12-10 in the 5th set.

ukip have already said that they will target 36 seats or thereabouts
the question is which marginals, and currently held by whom

Well worth a read.....

The Muslim Council of Britain have produced 72 pages of advice to schools designed to ‘promote greater understanding of the faith, religious and cultural needs’ of pupils from an Islamic background. It is entitled "Meeting the needs of Muslim Pupils in State Schools - Information & Guidance for Schools".

The Mail has investigated the man behind the production of this document and they feel it is nothing other than an important part of a masterminded plot by Islamic extremists to take over our schools.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2644322/The-Trojan-Horse-files-On-eve-explosive-report-claims-plot-Islamic-extremists-schools-investigate-man-accused-mastermind.html

The Trojan Horse files: On the eve of an explosive report into claims of a plot by Islamic extremists to take over schools, we investigate the man accused of being the mastermind
May 31, 2014
* Ofsted report on alleged plot to Islamicise students will be released in days
* Tahir Alam is a governor at three Birmingham schools facing criticism
* Alam, 45, can be revealed as author of a controversial 2007 booklet
* Guide to teaching Muslim pupils suggested segregation in state schools
* It also banned relationships, gay or straight, and teaching contraception
* One head claimed he appointed 'allies' as parent governors in 'coup'
* Alam denies plot and calls investigations an Islamophobic 'witch hunt'

SPECIAL REPORT By GUY ADAMS and SUE REID
PUBLISHED: 23:14, 30 May 2014

Filled with endless pictures of smiling children, the ‘information and guidance’ booklet must have looked anodyne when it tumbled off the press a few years ago.

It was produced by the Muslim Council of Britain and contained — in the words of the foreword — 72 pages of advice to schools designed to ‘promote greater understanding of the faith, religious and cultural needs’ of pupils from an Islamic background.

Even the title seemed, on the face of things, uncontroversial. It was called simply: Meeting The Needs Of Muslim Pupils In State Schools.


Controversy: Tahir Alam is the alleged mastermind of a plot by Islamic extremists to take over schools. The 45-year-old can be revealed as the author of a controversial 2007 booklet about teaching Muslim pupils

Appearances can be deceptive, though. For within days of its publication, this outwardly unremarkable booklet had sparked an explosive political controversy.

For, in the eyes of a host of vociferous critics, it amounted to nothing less than a blueprint for the ‘Islamicisation’ of Britain’s entire education system.

To that end, it called for sweeping changes in the way everything from music, art and sports, to biology and religious education were taught in schools.

One passage endorsed a ban on ‘unIslamic’ activities, such as dancing, for Muslim pupils.

Another said swimming lessons should be halted during Ramadan, because ‘the potential for swallowing water [when fasting] is very high’. A third, regarding behavioural codes, declared that ‘girlfriend/boyfriend as well as homosexual relationships’ are ‘not acceptable practices according to Islamic teachings’.

The booklet issued hawkish decrees on everything from architecture — it called for single-sex prayer rooms to be built at every school — to extra-curricular activities. School balls, discos and fashion shows should be avoided so as not to ‘inadvertently exclude’ Muslim parents and pupils, it cautioned.

Divisive: The 2007 booklet co-authored by Tahir Alam faced wide criticism when it was released

So, too, should fund-raising raffles, since gambling is forbidden by the Koran, Islam’s holy book.

At meal-times, meanwhile, it said children should be offered halal food, sourced from animals killed without first being stunned — the most ‘pure’ form of religious slaughter, dubbed cruel by animal welfare campaigners.

During biology lessons, many aspects of sex education, including teaching about contraception and the use of diagrams showing reproductive organs, would be regarded by Muslims as ‘completely inappropriate and encouraging morally unacceptable behaviour’.

In drama, Nativity plays were off-limits for Muslim pupils, while ‘parents may have reservations regarding participation in [any] theatrical plays or acting that involves physical contact between males and females’.

Art teachers, it added, ‘should avoid encouraging Muslim pupils from producing three-dimensional imagery of humans’, since that is also outlawed by the Koran.

‘Some Muslims may hold a very conservative attitude towards music and may seek to avoid it altogether,’ read a passage on music lessons.

‘Most Muslim parents will find little or no educational merit or value in dance or dancing after early childhood and may even find it objectionable.’ As for PE, the booklet said Muslim girls should wear full-length tracksuits and headscarves when taking part in even highly vigorous exercise, while teachers must avoid the ‘objectionable’ practice of allowing mixed-gender groups to play contact sports such as football or basketball.

Mixed-gender swimming sessions, even for primary school children, were ‘unacceptable for reasons of modesty and decency to Muslim parents’.

Finally, the booklet argued that all British children should have the option of studying Arabic, while staff should consider segregating morning assembly, with ‘separate acts of collective worship’ for Muslim and Christian students.

If you think some of that advice sounds divisive and extreme, not to say at odds with traditionally British educational values, you are not alone. For the contents of Meeting The Needs Of Muslim Pupils In State Schools sparked immediate controversy.

Claims: Park View School in Birmingham is one of those at the centre of the current controversy

In the days after its publication in February 2007, front-page newspaper reports savaged its ‘Taliban-style’ decrees. Several MPs and pressure groups attacked the booklet — which ended up being pulled from the Muslim Council of Britain’s (MCB) website — as dangerous and divisive.

‘The MCB needs to realise it has to move closer to the rest of the community, not away from it,’ said the Conservative MP Greg Hands, who is now a Government whip.

The National Secular Society dubbed the report ‘a recipe for disaster’. And the moderate Sufi Muslim Council, which claims to represent more Muslims than the MCB, said it had misunderstood the nature of Ramadan.

Lost in the noise, however, was the identity of the author behind this report. Perhaps surprisingly, he was neither named nor quoted in any of the mainstream coverage that followed its publication.

During biology lessons, many aspects of sex education, including teaching about contraception and the use of diagrams showing reproductive organs, would be regarded by Muslims as 'completely inappropriate and encouraging morally unacceptable behaviour'

Today, however, this individual — and his apparently-conservative beliefs — seems very relevant indeed.

He is crucial, in fact, to fully understanding a different, but no less chilling scandal that has in recent months raised another pressing set of questions about the relationship between Islam and the state education system.

The man in question is called Tahir Mahmo Alam. He is 45 years old, lives in Birmingham and intriguingly (given the conservative views espoused above) he happens to be the central figure in the so-called ‘Trojan Horse’ affair.

The story broke two months ago when a strange but shocking letter was leaked to newspapers.

Typed in italics and apparently unsigned and undated, it described a five-step strategy that Muslim extremists have supposedly been using to take over the running of a string of primary and secondary schools.

Their alleged ‘jihad’ was designed to ‘drip-feed our ideal for a Muslim school’ and went by the name Operation Trojan Horse.

It involved identifying target schools in predominately Muslim areas, getting sympathetic parents to join governing bodies and then using underhand methods to remove non-Muslim teachers from positions of influence.

After that, the curriculums, time-tables and cultures of the schools would be quietly altered to adhere to an Islamic ideal.

Alam, a governor of five schools in Birmingham, had supposedly ‘fine-tuned the Trojan Horse so it is totally invisible to the naked eye’, the letter said, allowing it to be quietly enacted across the city.

The plot would therefore spread to Bradford and Manchester, the letter continued, where Westernised teachers are ‘corrupting children with sex education, teaching about homosexuals, making children say Christian prayers and mixed swimming and sports’.


Probe: After the allegations surfaced, Ofsted commissioned an emergency report to investigate practices at 21 schools in Birmingham, including Park View (pictured)

It should at this point be stressed the letter has not been substantiated as genuine and cannot be held as proof that such a plot exists.

Indeed, since the day it emerged, Mr Alam has repeatedly described the document as a ‘hoax’ and ‘fabrication’ — a line he maintains.

'The factual errors in the letter are legion. The source has not been established. It can’t be taken seriously,' he said, when we spoke yesterday.

Yet while the provenance of the letter is murky, and the fact it contains several mis-spellings and factual errors, the problems it highlights are almost certainly genuine. Just as the letter states, several non-Muslim headteachers have, indeed, left their jobs in a small area of Birmingham (near to Alam’s home) in a very short space of time — five have departed in the past six months.

Thanks to a steady stream of concerned parents and teachers who have recently gone public, there also appears to be ample evidence of organised efforts to Islamicise local schools.


Alleged mastermind: Tahir Alam

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, has identified ‘concerted efforts’ to infiltrate at least six schools in Birmingham and ‘alter their character in line with the Islamic faith’.

Khalid Mahmood, the Labour MP for Birmingham’s Perry Barr, said: ‘There has been a serious bid to take over most of the schools in the east and south of the city.’ The local council admits receiving more than 200 complaints about the matter, prompting it to suspend recruitment of school governors.

Little wonder that the Trojan Horse allegations are being taken seriously at the highest levels of Government. Three inquiries into 25 Birmingham schools are underway.

One, by the former Scotland Yard anti-terror chief Peter Clarke — appointed by Education Secretary Michael Gove — will report in July. Another, by Birmingham Council, is due to release initial findings next week.

The third, and for now most important, is expected to be unveiled at a press conference next Thursday. It is the work of Sir Michael Wilshaw, head of Ofsted, who recently sent emergency teams of inspectors into 21 local schools.

They have been asked to establish exactly what has been going on in playgrounds, classrooms and assembly halls. And well-placed sources said this week that their findings are ‘dynamite’.

At least six schools are expected to be placed immediately in special measures by Ofsted — a move that gives the agency the power to remove staff and governors, and even close the school. Lesser, but nonetheless serious, action is expected at ten other schools.

Tellingly, at least three of the six schools said to be facing the most serious criticism have Tahir Alam as a governor. And all the others are said to be controlled by associates of Alam or people linked to faith-based organisations in which he takes a prominent role.

The three main establishments — Park View, Golden Hillock and Nansen primary — are within a few miles of each other in Small Heath, a neighbourhood just east of Birmingham city centre where Mr Alam lives with his wife and two children.

Far-reaching: Education Secretary Michael Gove was accused of knowing about the allegations since 2010

A fourth, Oldknow, has as its head governor Achmad da Costa, a friend of Alam and fellow director of an organisation called the Muslim Parents Association. ‘You get a sense of Alam’s hardline agenda from the views he espoused in the MCB document,’ adds the source.

‘What you don’t realise, until you visit the schools he’s taken control of, is the sort of environment it creates.’

At Park View, for example, there have been complaints of segregation in classrooms and of GCSE syllabuses being restricted to comply with conservative Islamic teaching.

Sex education lessons have allegedly seen impressionable teenage boys told that rape is legal in marriage, while religious education classes have apparently seen pupils given a list of Christian teachers and told to try to convert them.

At one assembly, a senior teacher is said to have endorsed terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki. At another, detailed by a Sunday newspaper, he allegedly described non-Muslims to pupils as ‘kuffar’ — or infidels.

Sex education lessons have, according to reports in a Sunday newspaper, seen impressionable teenage boys told rape is legal in marriage, while religious education classes have seen pupils given a list of Christian teachers and told to try to convert them

Last November, Sheikh Shady al-Suleiman, a preacher many regard as extremist, was invited to speak at the school.

Nigel Sloan, a former teacher at the school, has said Mozz Hussain, the deputy headmaster, preached ‘mind-blowing’ anti-American and anti-Western ‘propaganda’ to pupils, describing the U.S. as ‘the evil in the world’ and ‘the cause of all famine’.

Former Park View teacher Michael White told us this week that the problems dated to the Nineties, when Alam became a governor.

‘Within a few weeks he’d got his allies to become parent governors, which gave them a majority on the committee. Then things began to get very nasty indeed. I would describe it as a coup,’ he said.

‘They began to complain about the way we taught religious education, the way sex was dealt with in science, the teaching of art and music, that kind of thing.

‘They got parents to complain. It totally undermined senior staff.

‘I’ve no idea whether the Trojan Horse document is real. But the stuff it says is happening certainly is. Everything in that letter is what I experienced at Park View. It has been going on for years.’

At Nansen primary, Arabic lessons are compulsory, from the age of four, while entire year groups have allegedly been prevented from learning arts. Concerns have been raised over recently appointed deputy head Razwan Faraz, who once ran an online forum called Educational Activists, which pursued an ‘Islamicising agenda’ in schools, and is the brother of Ahmed Faraz, a bookseller jailed for terror- related offences.

Golden Hillock school has seen discussion of sexual orientation ‘banned’ in science, the arts and literature, and Creationism — the belief the world was created by a divine being and evolution is false — taught in biology, according to a whistleblower. Non-Muslim students were reportedly left to ‘teach themselves’ religious education, one newspaper alleged.


Inquiry: Earlier this month, the names of 18 schools at the centre of the alleged plot were revealed in a list by Birmingham City Council. Above, one of the schools, Gracelands Nursery School in Sparkbrook

At Oldknow school, meanwhile, Department for Education investigators found conservative teachers had introduced segregated PE lessons, led anti-Christian chanting in assemblies and banned the celebration of Christmas.

Three school trips have allegedly been organised to Mecca, and the study of French scrapped because the country has banned the Islamic veil, the inspectors have discovered.

School governors and senior staff they have appointed are blamed for the recent departure of Bhupinder Kondal, a non-Muslim head said to have been ‘driven from office’ for resisting their Islamising agenda.

'Whatever accommodations we are making to respond to the aspirations of [Muslim] parents, these are in addition to teaching the full national curriculum, which we are required to do as a community school.'

The Park View Educational Trust, which runs Park View, Nansen, and Golden Hillock, will be issuing a formal response to next week’s Ofsted findings via Communitas a 'strategic' PR company it has hired to handle its affairs. It put out an interim statement earlier this month, denying several allegations of wrongdoing.

Sources close to recent investigations disagree. 'What’s amazing about these places,' says one, 'is that you don’t have to look very hard to see what’s going on. I mean, take even a cursory glance at Tahir Alam, and it’s entirely clear where his loyalties lie. Indeed it is.

'Firestorm': Birmingham City Council CEO Mark Rogers predicted a 'serious' response from Ofsted's forthcoming report

A former BT engineer, Alam describes himself as an educational consultant. Ironically, given the nature of the Trojan Horse scandal, he has in recent years derived much of his income as a ‘trainer’ of school governors, mostly for Labour-run Birmingham Council.

He has strong connections to Labour activists and power-brokers in the city, counting prominent MP Liam Byrne as a ‘friend’ on Facebook. A Labour councillor, Habib Rehman, has sat on the governing body of a school with Alam,

Alam began getting involved in education in the Nineties and soon became governor of several schools. One, Washwood Heath Academy, terminated his directorship earlier this month, according to records filed at Companies House. No reason was given. Others ‘may well find themselves forced to dispense with his services in the near future’, according to a source.

Alam’s wider interests include a directorship of the Muslim Parents Association, a non-profit group that seeks to ‘empower Muslim parents to advance the education of their children’ and a place on the board of the Association of Muslim Schools.

The latter organisation runs the controversial Bridge Schools Inspectorate, which fulfils the role of Ofsted for private Muslim schools. The think-tank Policy Exchange has accused it of covering up extremism and called for its abolition.

Alam is also a director of a dormant company called the Bordesley Birmingham Trust, an organisation credited as encouraging creativity and learning for children, whose fellow board members include Bridge Schools Inspectorate and (bizarrely) a clairvoyant called Ivy Caesar.

A previously undisclosed fourth directorship of a company raises further pressing questions. Called Crescent Books Limited, it appears to be a publishing firm entirely owned by a charity called the Islamic Dawah Centre International (IDCI).

'Within a few weeks [Alam] had got his allies to become parent governors, which gave them a majority on the committee. Then things began to get very nasty indeed. I would describe it as a coup' (- Former Park View teacher Michael White)

On its website, the IDCI describes its raison d’etre as ‘conveying the pure and pristine message of Islam’. And this agenda has caused it to flirt with controversy in the past. In 2010, the centre invited Dr Zakir Naik to speak at an event, only to have it cancelled after discovering that the Muslim cleric was banned from visiting Britain due to an exclusion order after saying ‘every Muslim should be a terrorist’.

Shortly afterwards, the IDCI was investigated over the alleged sale of extremist books on its website, though no evidence of wrongdoing was uncovered.

Mr Alam tells me he’s seen the Ofsted reports but 'won’t comment on their contents until nearer the time.' In recent interviews, however, he’s described investigations as 'a witch hunt” inspired by Islamophobia.

Others aren’t so sure. ‘That’s Alam’s response to any criticism,’ said Michael White this week. ‘He claims Islamophobia or racism. But that’s nonsense. It’s not about who he is. That’s not the problem. The problem is what he and his associates are doing to children in our schools.’