Top faller in the Banking sector today with a 25% fall are they about to go bust as the housing market stalls .. are they another Northern Rock failure about to blow.

Down 17% today and I never even noticed.

Love the smell of burning.

is this price rise the result of shorters buying out or has something fundamentally changed?
all the banks seem to have risen this morning surley the Dow coouldn't have had that much effect!!!
Alex

Up 80%.

..Again for how long?

Was 47p but now falling back.

robertalexander- see my Lloy post which I think probably explains it.

its a confidence trick, sucking new money in before an almighty crash. For all intent and purposes Shorting stocks had already stopped as the large pension funds would not loan their shares as finally realising the fee's they were making were nothing on the loss of equity from the turmoil. Despite this HBOS still traded nearly .5 billion shares. People will wake up and when they do it is going to hurt. Most people are stuggling to trade at these prices anyway because of the trading platforms so it is nothing but a paper illusion. IMO

Absolutely, but they have to find a way to protect the banking system and shift the burden onto the gereral public or taxpayer. Taxes cannot rise in this environment so currencies will take the brunt and some of the debt will effectively be inflated away over time. It will effect everybody.

This week will pass into history the banks that survive BB. for one IMO will slowly get back to normality and the sp back to 100p-200p + long term. accumulate while you can.

It has been an interesting week for all of us investors riding this roller-coaster ride.

I start the bidding at 20p.

Interesting article on short sellin which explains it better:

"Those who argue for unrestricted short-selling ignore the fact that the system is loaded in favour of the bears. If an individual invests 1,000, or an institution 1m, in the shares of a troubled company because they think in the long term it will recover, they have deployed their capital, and all they can do is wait. There is no more to invest; their resources are finite.
If a short-seller comes on the scene, his resources are in effect infinite because he first borrows the shares he then sells. Given that the revenue from the sale is more than the borrowing cost of the shares, he has no net capital constraint and can continue indefinitely - so much so that in one celebrated case a few years ago, one person shorted 250% of a company's equity, though he did get into trouble for it.

If the target is a bank, the dice are even more loaded. As the selling drives the share price down, two things happen.

First, the rating agencies announce a review of the credit rating, or worse a downgrade. This will force the bank to sell assets to shore up its capital position, and will set alarm bells ringing. At the same time, other banks will get nervous about dealing with it as a counterparty and either curb their business or charge more, thereby weakening the target bank still further.

Short-selling becomes self-fulfilling because the tumbling share price erodes confidence in the bank, and that weakens so it is worth less - until the ultimate cataclysm when people start queuing in the street to withdraw their money, at which point it is doomed and the authorities have to nationalise it.

However, in doing this it is politically impossible for them to bail out the shareholders. So they take the bank over for nothing - or get it rescued at a much-reduced price - thereby wiping out the long-term investors who are the bedrock of the system, handing massive rewards to the short-sellers who have done the damage and leaving the taxpayer to finance the clean-up.

On the way, they have destroyed a business that did not need to be destroyed. So yes. It is time short-selling of banks was banned. "

But say I have a very large load of shares in a company and decide I don't like its prospects and dump them in one go. Then other investors see my trade, review their position and follow suit thus probably dumping their holds. The SP plummets and then I decide that the price fits the fundamentals and buy am I wrong to. The results are similar to the people using derivatives and they are using other peoples shares and paying interest for the loan of the money.

25p today and could go to 15p before a bid appears.

Doubt that , reading on Motley ING possibly make offer before end of week, bought earlier at 26.5 - so not too worried yet ! Looks like all the U.K banks are going to be owned by foreigners shortly. U.S get there fingers out and another take over and we'll see the crazy deals of last week - here's hoping:-)

After hours RNS could boost the sp in the morning:





RNS Number : 1345E
Bradford & Bingley PLC
23 September 2008





Bradford & Bingley plc



Bradford & Bingley and GMAC-RFC announce new terms for mortgage agreement

Bradford & Bingley (the Company) and GMAC-RFC confirm today that they have successfully
renegotiated the terms of their mortgage forward
sale agreement.

Under the original terms of the agreement, signed in December 2006, the Company agreed to
purchase a minimum of 350m of UK mortgage
assets per quarter, with 1.75bn remaining to be purchased before the end of 2009.

Both businesses have agreed to revise the terms of this agreement to their mutual benefit
whereby 500m of loans will be acquired in Q4
2008 and between 225m and 250m in Q1 2009 after which the agreement will cease. GMAC-RFC
will receive in lieu, the equivalent of the
premium that would have been paid should the agreement have run the full term.


ENDS

Still far too risky to buy..

Agree with Mitzy. Tempting, but I think further to fall. 15p could be worth a punt.

why would it be worth a punt at 15p but not now ? Personally got in at 24p yesterday and would be seriously concerned of loosing my money if it fell to 15p as far more likely to hit the wall than when hovering around its current base. Can't get my head around some of the numbers people come out with to justify their actions