Having entered bke for the Moneyam 2004 share tip contest
a few days early, it has risen ever since so unless the Competition
rules are changed to give the date of entry to the competition as the base price for the share winning, my entry has had it.
But another 42.9% increase today is extraordinary for what is
normally a dull share.

As is deramping without foundation...

Is telling it the way it is deramping?

A pound within a year is in my book as there is no hope of that.

Not as long as Numis churns out notes like the last one.

Nice to see that you are still fascinated by me AdieH and cant keep away.

I will try to highlight to other posters that you post misleading information and have your own agenda... and you have certain issues with Richard Worthington...I will contact RW nearer the AGM and see if we can get a special invite but I doubt you would turn up my friend... I if I still hold will most certainly be there LOL...

i rarely agree with 10B, and certainly get totally fed up with his incessant and repetitive and verbose postings, but i confess i also think this stock has little to commend it from just simple basics ....

total cap is only 0.77m
spread is near enough 33%

it follows that the smallest buy/sell will have a disproportionate effect on the sp, and God forbid that there should be a general market fallout, and this stock will be unsaleable.

why on earth would anyone in their right mind invest here?

Ok fair enough he has to strike lucky sometime but can you put some meat on the bones...

ah .... well i have edited my post since you wrote!

AdieH give it a rest you are now a pathetic winger.

Go run to Worthinting run to the world and tell them all from me that I think both BKE and COH are junk companies.

if you want me t put some bones on BKE I will, Right from how lack of motivation lost then te niche market with te COOP.

How Kieth Bently has sat on his arse raking off 40k a year whist the shareholders funds are depleted each week and more and more and more---

Now Hurford-----You started this again not me, now run to Ian first and check if I can defend my position as you could not stay away for long could you----man your sick, obssessed and sick.

And by the way I strike it lucky most of the time.

Guys,

I specifically requested that you stop this petty squabble and not descend into personal insults. You have simply moved from the thread I targeted onto 2 other ones. I do not care who started this, if I have or see any reports of personal abuse from this point forward from either side on any thread I will remove your access.

I hope I am clear.

Ian

Sorry Ian wont bait him again he's just shown his real colours... Enough from me Regards.

IAN its this idiot who follows me as you can clearly see;.

How childish to admitt to baiting a person---why what possible motive can there be for such idiocy.

BKE 10 by the end of the year, you read it here first :))

only by consolidating the shares umpteen times!

Cynic, get stuffed, 10 by Xmas then ;)

Yup, you're both right.
Don't care AidieH, it's only a bit of fun is this one!
UC.

edit:
I've done it again!!!!!
didn't realise I wasn't looking at the last posts.
The above comments relate to posts 28 & 39.

CMGP is better!

IanT(MoneyAM), I have squelched offending posts as you suggested and also squelched those that respond to them. Why do you think it is that others can't do the same?
Eveyone else:-
Guys It's simple, just don't rise to the bait! Don't unsquelch, not even once or those that do will just get drawn in to the squabbling again and the offending poster WINS!!!!!
Thats exactly what he wants you to do.
It would be a shame if the good guys like AidieH, cynic etc. get banned and David doesn't. It could happen because as far as I'm aware he doesn't use insults against any posters - just slags off RW. So his game is probably to provoke the rest of you into using insults and get YOU banned. Think about it?
UC.

P.S. I know I've used insults in the past but I don't now.

how dare you refer to me as a good guy ..... have you any idea how damaging that will be to my reputution? ...... Ian - this guy should be banned at once before he causes real damage!!!!

:-)

Look guys if you want to ban me then go ahead and an me, but please give your solid reasons for doing so as there are laws to protect my right to free speech on a public BB.

So what is so offensive to you?.

Is it my total ignorance of the market and how its works?

Well that being the case I am, as I said right from the start, here to learn.

Are all you illustrious opposers of mine, opposed too as well to educating the ignorant? Which I humbly confess to be on most things

Or could there be a more sinister rational?

Could it be that people such as AHIEH and beemmer, angry people at best, are annoyed that I have busted up their comfortable taitatait rampings of COH--the more they ramp the more suckers get drawn in etc etc.

I have exposed COH for what I believe it to be and called it right dead right and now there is obviously more to come as its still a loss making company which appears to me to be runing around in circles and paying propbably over the odds for Snack Attack, a complete chain of outlets Worthigton could have bought for a song not that long ago.

I was a member here for years before I posted---thats right years, I just read the posts and picked up what I could, an yes made some little money out of the market.

We all have our different ways of doing things, I happen to follow WB principles.

I dont agree with TA, as I do not agree with crystal balls, and witchcraft, I believe in solid fundamentals and these tell you to go on past performance and solid accounts. ie concret laying.

I dont believe that you can forecast share performance as there are so many imponderables moving in on the equations daily if not hourly.

Although that said I appreciate the work cyinic and PTH put into thier craft.

Since forecasting the COH drop its got very personal---to me I dont mind as infantiles usual cry when they toys are taken away, as do bullies when they cant get their own way.

No problem for me, none what so ever.

I now see that beemer says COH has a dossiers on me, mmmhhh reminds me of the good old days of the Cold War.

Yes I am highly critical of Richard Worthington, and yes I think things are not as they should be at COH---but I say so here and out in the open.

You see I have nothing to hide and I would now very much like to see the COH dossier on me, if in fact there is one.

Under the Freedon of Information Act I am entitle to see any files etc,etc

But let me make it easy all round, for if Mr Worhtigton has been telling his sychopants tales out of school, which beemer sems to imply, then that to is further misconduct for a CEO.

So my message is cklear to Mr Worthingtom and co, if indeed as your shareholder beemer claims you have a dossier on me for simply publicly opposiing your COH and BKE business methods, then why not do as I do and publish what you have here, right here, ! right now, today and lets clear the air!

You can rest assured of two things, with the recent events in COH leave more questions unanswerd than answered and I will keep seeking the truth.

Furthermore if you are man enough to publish this alledged dossier that your appear to happy to informMr beemer that you have, may I respectfully suggest that kindly ensure that when you put it here its all cortect and true as there are some very stringent libel laws.

And more importantly, if as you claim you know me then obviously you will be aware that I have just won two libel cases, and settle one in my favour out of court, and very lucrative ideed they were! People only "thinking" they knew what they were talking about as opposed to knowing.

You see fans what ever and when ever I will always seek out and go for the truth over everything else.

Like what some of you say here I am COH bashing or WNG bashing---that not quite so///there is nothing in it for me.

I just happen to feel that financial BBs are not all about a vested interests ramping of owned shares.

Financial BBs should be about educating and enlightening, freely, honestly and openly.

I was party to the WIGGINS debacle I dont want to see that again in any shape of form.

I am so crital f the FSA they should have prosicted Tom Winnifirth for the Oliver Inny interviews which gave by chance of design, I really do know, the sentiments that things were right with Wiggins. They were not Wiggins went bust taking shareholders fund with it many life saving went to the wall.

Also your tax monies went in the form of EU grants that Wiggins directors, falsely in my opinion cliamed from the EU RDFs.

I made severel protestations to the various EU departments and MEPs involved in giving WIGGINS you loot, and not one did a darned thing, they were happy to lose the grant money which went to the wall with WIGGINS, as of course the tax payers were paying.

HOWEVER WHEN WE STOP LOOK FOR "FAIR PLAY" WE MAY AS WELL JUST STOP!

If you want to ban me then ban me(stating why) if not I will be back tomorrow looking for more answers on the COH/Snack Attack tie up---opps no not tomorow got a lunch meeting with with a finance director of one of my companies that I invest in.

But over the weekend.

Have a really good night and I trust you all sleep as soundly as I.

IAN...PLEASE BAN HIM.