Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

halifax - 26 Jun 2008 16:57 - 449 of 8631

Sounds like we are about to get a profits warning.

Dil - 26 Jun 2008 17:01 - 450 of 8631

Be nice for holders if they warned they were going to make one someday !!

scotinvestor - 26 Jun 2008 17:24 - 451 of 8631

what u on about halifax!

u didnt even know there was an offer and that was in feb.....waken up old chap.

now i think u need to go to woolies to sort that out 1st before trying something more secretive like mdx.
jes, james bond ala sean connery would struggle with whats going on.

i want miss.moneypenny though....mmmmm woff woof

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 08:12 - 452 of 8631

BM or Big Muppet as hes known to his friends has made extraordinary efforts to bully and beat up our company.. That company is obviously worth the vast time and money Mr Muppet has put in. The problem is nobody wants to fight back Ibbetson goes because he is called a few names.
And the front line are fighting with Bows & Arrows against Nuclear. BM was responsible for taking on and KO ing Stanelco.in 04.hes a scrapper that needs knocking outFRED!!!!

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 09:15 - 453 of 8631

lol that must have been one hell of a meeting as a number of resolutions were not passed including the renumeration report re directors.

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 09:19 - 454 of 8631

Buy/Sell. levels you devils still down 6%

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 09:50 - 455 of 8631

One things for sure - when two sets of people spend so much effort fighting over something, it's a fair bet they know there's something worth fighting over!

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 10:18 - 456 of 8631

Self interest more like.

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 10:27 - 457 of 8631

. Exactly BertAnd you have a self interest Dilyou can tell your old mate..your safe!!!.. nobody reads these posts.

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 10:29 - 458 of 8631

Suppose I'd kick, bite, lie, and cheat in a fight to keep a 600k pa job - and just as hard to get my hands on a company worth 1+ a share for 30p a share.... :-)

scotinvestor - 27 Jun 2008 10:58 - 459 of 8631

I think the root cause of this farce is that BM did not understand what drives RT and that RT would do everything possible to thwart a takeover at this stage while RT did not understand how investors would react to the long drawn out bid process and to the rejection of all proposals.

It is possible that BM never had enough backing for a realistic bid and he was only trying to act as a catalyst to encourage other bidders or he may have expected RT to cave in to an offer that more than doubled the SP.

Whatever the truth of the matter, there were too many hot-headed investors who had banked on a quick sale and were easy targets for shorters once the offers collapsed. I suspect the SP would be a lot healthier had BM never rekindled his interest in the company

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 12:17 - 460 of 8631

I would love to understand the situation Scotty.everybody acts for a gain in some way.. its human nature. RT did not want a takeoverBM has a large financial interestevery single piece of news has apparently been designed to murder the SP other than the initial approach. The SP would have certainly been much healthier had there been no approach. End of the day RT position not a banker.BM done his Boll**ks..Peter Ibbetson goes crying to his mummy investors not exactly happy bunniesthe only gainers were the shorters And they just used the fiasco. I personally think BM was far more sure of his position and his actions than most people thought.I think unfortunately he did have the backing.. I cannot see him throwing away telephone numbers just as a vendetta.. would you drive a price down if you were sitting with a shed loadunless you were guaranteed to be the winner. I dont think BM is used to coming second. I hope Im wrong! either way mdx will grow!

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 12:20 - 461 of 8631

'Grow' from todays position is almost a certainty - which is ok if you got in at todays prices.... not if 'grow' only equates to a return to what it was before the schoolyard spat!

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 12:31 - 462 of 8631

Bert I need 58p to get level. But mdx still owes me nothing!

tabasco - 27 Jun 2008 12:33 - 463 of 8631

And I can still laugh and tell a joke.

hangon - 27 Jun 2008 12:44 - 464 of 8631

AGM was a sorry washing of underwear in Public - a pretty poor example for anyone thinking of buying stock. Luckily it wasn't raining - the queue was right round the corner in the street. What a way to run a business - ( -you'd think this was 30bnTesco - with their Healthy Chicken and US-Union woes!!). This is AIM_minor company and yet the AGM was like a military operation. (The disgraceful E-mail was shown - I saw but one...the work of an educated nutter, probably distraught at their losses! ).

I'm inclined to agree with Tabasco (today) - that explains the fiasco that was the sp rise early in the year. I'm surprised that AIM-Rules don't require a Bidder supports a bid for at least the current sp ( or whatever sp they offer), just as an Estate Agent will enquire of Buyers if they have the means before showing them expensive houses.

Furthermore I'm not convinced by MDX "official-line" that they are a young pharma - where the sp is not related to the Management efforts (hence their Bonuses!)- and that this is now a stronger business - er, was it so bad as "belly-up" in 2005? If it was, they never said, did they?
Anyway this ISN'T like a small pharma - trying to make the Big-Time . . . .IMHO - - since they have bought products that already existed....their "contribution" is to apply some film and a lot of ballyhoo about the "improvement"....as far as I discern!
Well, IMHO, an improvement is one that adds value beyond all expectations....COMPARE: a roll of go-faster tape (on a beat-up car) - is practically worthless....whereas a DIY sport-car conversion ( kit-car), means your running gear remain and the style/pulling-power, performance is like a Porsche. THAT is what I'd like for the price of Go-Faster tape, - however unrealistic.

MDX is supplying old products in go-faster packing....that may be unkind, but it is closer to the reality - as I see little "Developemnt at fundamental level" - NOR do I see any Regulated Trials - a hallmark of any early-stage drug-discovery pharma.
- - - - - Now who is right? - - - -
- For my impression is that the company continues to blurr these issues and by not selling into UK-retail, you cannot look at the shelves in Boots and see how they stack-up (no Pun) against the alternatives.

Littlebert are you a believer in this Company? - or do you think the sp "can't get any worse" - (well it can and I'll not be surprised we see 20p's) - the splat as you imply did not help - but the sp was trending down even before Bids fortutously helped the sp. When, for example, do you think there will be a dividend? - this Co is about 10-years old (way back), yet a Name-change and lots of purchases don't appear to have made "returns" any clearer....although Directors appear pleased with progress I don't get the impression many present agree, although their signals are somewhat confusing.

=All IMHO - - all other views - - put 'em here!

If this is the beginning of a large Profitable business let;s hope it's soon.

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 13:23 - 465 of 8631

Oh well 20p it is then.

scotinvestor - 27 Jun 2008 15:19 - 466 of 8631

it was 10p about a week or so ago....so thats 100% improvement already

when u say its 40p, i know price will be 1 plus

anyway this was always a long term hold for me.....just that in jan it seemed we would be getting much higher sp rather than other way around......ah well another year or so aint going to do much harm.....should be a change of gov too...yay

littlebert2 - 27 Jun 2008 15:26 - 467 of 8631

where? Rhodesia? Whoops, slip of the old colonial tongue there, as the old girl knows I like :-)


Hangon - a believer only that the SP will rise, which is why I bought in this morning - don't care about the company as long as the SP rises - no matter who wins a power struggle, it always stabilises / benefits the SP of a troubled company.....

Dil - 27 Jun 2008 15:27 - 468 of 8631

Last time I said 40p you bit my head off scotty , how times have changed :-)
Register now or login to post to this thread.