cynic
- 20 Oct 2007 12:12
rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.
for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ
for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance
jimmy b
- 23 Oct 2009 09:48
- 4493 of 21973
skinny we had this conversation before .
required field
- 23 Oct 2009 09:52
- 4494 of 21973
Anybody like myself think the dollar is gong to drop against most currencies ?.
dealerdear
- 23 Oct 2009 09:53
- 4495 of 21973
has just collapsed
HARRYCAT
- 23 Oct 2009 10:00
- 4496 of 21973
& many analysts are saying it's time to get out of gold, which would usually be contrary to a weakening $.
dealerdear
- 23 Oct 2009 10:14
- 4497 of 21973
which probably means gold will go through the roof!
jimmy b
- 23 Oct 2009 11:41
- 4498 of 21973
Just ask Gorden Brown he'll tell you when to sell gold ,man's a genius..
dealerdear
- 23 Oct 2009 11:45
- 4499 of 21973
lol
required field
- 23 Oct 2009 11:45
- 4500 of 21973
The thing with gold is that the asian economies are very fond of the stuff....should keep it high.
skinny
- 23 Oct 2009 12:00
- 4501 of 21973
For those that need reminding about Mr Brown's
Shrewdness!
cynic
- 23 Oct 2009 14:39
- 4502 of 21973
just to go back a few posts ...... playing the indices is arguably muh less risky than playing with individual stocks, for with FTSE (for example) you are effectively buying into a basket of 100 companies and the share price movement thereof.
for myself, i certainly only dabble gently, but with IG offering CFD contracts at 2 a point, and i am sure others are similar, one can be as brave or foolhardy or cautious as one wishes
cynic
- 26 Oct 2009 16:01
- 4503 of 21973
things that go bump in the night, or even mid afternoon in this case ..... Dow was earlier +100 and is now and suddenly -100, for no published reason ..... "too far, too fast" syndrome?
jimmy b
- 26 Oct 2009 16:22
- 4504 of 21973
Thats why its gambling playing indicies. Rest my case.
cynic
- 26 Oct 2009 16:35
- 4505 of 21973
so is it buying/selling shares!!!
indices only rise/fall in line with the shares within them - there's nothing arcane about it!
jimmy b
- 26 Oct 2009 16:48
- 4506 of 21973
I dont think its quite the same cynic ,,if you sat day after day trading the DOW/FTSE up and down ,i think it would be harder than investing in companies ,its more toss of a coin .Heads or tails.
cynic
- 26 Oct 2009 16:58
- 4507 of 21973
FTSE100 (for example) is like a unit trust with a holding across those companies ..... de facto, FTSE is intrinsically less volatile than an individual company, and assuredly less so if your preference is to dabble in amoeba and minnows
if you're going to try to make money day trading, you're virtually a racing certainty to get immolated regardless of what you buy/sell
KEAYDIAN
- 26 Oct 2009 17:09
- 4508 of 21973
I'd rather trade indices than shares
dealerdear
- 26 Oct 2009 17:19
- 4509 of 21973
i've been 'immolated' whatever that means!
skinny
- 26 Oct 2009 17:24
- 4510 of 21973
Apparently its the first album by the Polish death metal band -
Dies Irae :-)
KEAYDIAN
- 26 Oct 2009 17:25
- 4511 of 21973
:O)
cynic
- 26 Oct 2009 17:27
- 4512 of 21973
DD - are you sure you don't mean molested?