Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

It looked like it was taken by a member of the public

There was a good comment about Boris standing for Uxbridge.

"He is more Oxbridge than Uxbridge"

Maybe the video showed on the news was not the one linked to him being at http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/05/24/04/25/no-proof-harris-there-when-girls-gropedLeigh park ,

Time for the beeb to be broken up?



BBC accused of sanitising its news coverage of Rotherham child abuse by Pakistani gangs by failing to refer to perpetrators' ethnicity

Report found 1,400 children abused between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham

Majority of the perpetrators were Pakistani men, the report revealed

But a fear of acknowledging their ethnicity 'compounded the scandal'

Five of seven article on BBC News online do not mention Pakistani men

Ukip MEP blasts omission as 'spineless', readers outraged on Twitter



By Mia De Graaf for MailOnline

Published: 11:16, 27 August 2014 | Updated: 11:26, 27 August 2014


The BBC has enraged licence fee-payers by allegedly downplaying the role of Pakistani gangs in Rotherham's sex abuse scandal.

Yesterday's landmark report singled out Pakistani men as the main perpetrators in the sexual exploitation of at least 1,400 children over 16 years - and warned a fear of acknowledging their race compounded the scandal.

But today, five of BBC News Online's seven articles on the report made no reference to Pakistani men.



'Sanitised': The BBC's website has been accused of downplaying the role of Pakistanis in Rotherham's abuse scandal. Yesterday's report singled out Pakistanis as the main perpetrators and warned of a fear of racism




more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2735465/BBC-accused-sanitising-news-coverage-Rotherham-child-abuse-Asian-gangs-failing-refer-perpetrators-ethnicity.html

The trouble with the BBC now is they think their audience are 14 year olds . Celebrity rules , any opportunity to show Beckham etc at Wimbledon is taken far too often.

How sad.
How ironic to the USA anti-gun lobbyists.

Telegraph.co.uk/news - Nine-year-old-American-girl-accidentally-kills-shooting-instructor-with-Uzi-submachine-gun

Yes and there's a video , not that i'd want to see it.

She did OK with the first two single shots. And then.......

His final words, captured on video, were: “All right, full auto."

I'm amazed they let a nine year old even hold a 9mm sub machine gun, much less fire it.

The recoil alone would be too much for most 9yo's.

Also, full auto is illegal in the good ol usa for private citizens. Gang bangers only.

Only illegal to own. It is fine to fire auto at ranges.

Do remember you are talking "Gun Nutter Land".

So the Americans are thinking of banning heading the ball at "soccer" matches because it is too dangerous, but playing with guns is okay.

doodlebug

Are sure it wasn't EU that want's it banned

Update - Labour lead at 1
by YouGov in Politics
Thu August 28, 2014 6 a.m. BST

Latest YouGov / The Sun results 27th August - Con 34%, Lab 35%, LD 7%, UKIP 14%;

aldwickk - from The New York Times;

Ban Heading in Youth Soccer



Stefan Fatsis is the author of "Word Freak" and "A Few Seconds of Panic." He talks about sports on NPR’s “All Things Considered” and on Slate’s sports podcast “Hang Up and Listen.”

Updated June 27, 2014, 12:51 PM


Banning heading in youth soccer should be totally without controversy. Why? 1. Most kids aren’t strong or coordinated enough to head the ball properly. 2. Heading the ball improperly increases the risk of injury, to the heading player and opponents. 3. Not heading the ball at all detracts nothing from, and in fact improves, the game; kids get better at soccer by learning to control the ball out of the air with their feet, thighs, chest and other body parts.



That more current and retired players have not acknowledged the perils of brain injury has been an embarrassment to soccer.

But the driving force in this debate is reason No. 4: the accumulated effects of what for some players will be thousands of instances of banging their heads into a not-so-soft object starting at an early age. Those effects, however logical they might appear, lack scientific certainty, which has made it easy for soccer people to label calls for a reduction in heading, even among children, as alarmist. Which is why the endorsement of Brandi Chastain, Cindy Parlow Cone and Joy Fawcett is big. If soccer parents, coaches, clubs and leagues won’t listen to evolving science, common sense or the words of a writer/U13 girls coach like me, maybe they will listen to three stars from the greatest women’s team ever.

That more current and retired players have not acknowledged the perils of brain injury has been an embarrassment to soccer, especially women’s soccer, in which the incidence of head trauma is higher than among men. U.S. national team star Abby Wambach has scored more than 40 percent of her record number of goals in international competition with her head. But she has been silent and sometimes cavalier about brain injuries, including, as I reported last year on Slate, her own. So credit to Chastain, Fawcett and Parlow Cone for endorsing a developmentally sensible and competitively harmless delay in heading.

Let’s hope the people who "ooh" and "aah" when they see 9-year-olds bonk the ball aimlessly off their noggins listen, and do the totally uncontroversial thing.

Tory MP defects to UKIP

Defected to UKIP in theory more than in practice. He is resigning his seat and triggering a by election in Clacton on Sea. If he doesn't get elected then he won't be in any party. He gave a speech full of nonsense that makes him very suitable for UKIP. Not a great loss.

My son scored the record number of tries for his school and also scored the winning try against Stoneyhurst when his school played them in an away match. Indeed, for his rugger skills he was the school hero because the school hadn't managed to beat Stoneyhurst for over 25 years.

Obviously, my wife and I used to give him lots of spectator support and we went to watch him play every game.

So, why is this relevant to the 'kids doing soccer heading' discussion? I'll tell you:

Q. How many 'potential broken necks' did we ever witness amongst these schoolboy teams?
A. To the best of my memory, about 8.

And someone out there in the USA wants to discuss whether schoolboys (and schoolgirls?) should be banned from heading a football?

I have utter cognitive dissonance about youth rugby. At the time we could not consider stopping him play. He enjoyed it. He was good at it. The team depended on him. Playing was the norm. We could not easily go against the popular stance.

As parents, we watched our son play, just hoping that nothing too dangerous would happen to him. Fortunately nothing ever did,

Hmmm? But how about someone over here discussing the safety of schoolboy rugby?

Hays Hays Hays........good old Dougie, insiders say their are at least another 12 thinking of moving over and up to as many as 22 tories. Camoron is WEAK.

This is easy peasy for Labour now.

On another topic Wayne Rooney England Captain.........PATHETIC.

Gosh how low have England sunk.

We will soon be on a World Rating alongside Scotland and Wales, and no disrespect to them.