Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

Dil - 27 Nov 2008 11:51 - 4535 of 8631

Oi tabby , if they are doing so uckin well why they closing places ?

tabasco - 27 Nov 2008 12:12 - 4536 of 8631

Thanks Kim.talking on the other sideNo ones doing well Dil.. This news shows to myself that the BOD are undertaking appropriate action for a comprehensive restructurework is being doneand at a fast rate for once.I would like to see further announcements to clarify directionthe new poster on ADV.. 2ronnies that obviously had inside info was in my opinion an employee that had just received his marching orders?

kimoldfield - 27 Nov 2008 12:18 - 4537 of 8631

I sincerely hope that the measures the board are taking to stabilise the business are not too little too late Tabby.

Dil - 27 Nov 2008 12:27 - 4538 of 8631

2ronnies has been there a while and yesterday all the knowledgable posters and those in the know (those with their heads up their ar*es) were slagging him off.

tabasco - 27 Nov 2008 12:32 - 4539 of 8631

Thanks once again KimI can tell you that all action taken now will be for shareholder valuethe KKs and Barry have a huge 36/37 million reasons to work for an SP increaseas opposed to RTs zero reason

jkd - 27 Nov 2008 13:02 - 4540 of 8631

gotta laugh at these rnss sometimes
reduce the cash outflow by at least $1.8m per annum and the cost of exiting will be minimal. a balance sheet write down of approx.5m. thats only 278% isnt it?
regards
jkd

Dil - 27 Nov 2008 13:16 - 4541 of 8631

They not very good at accounts jkd , never have been.

And BM's in it for himself tabby ... his holding is miniscule.

jkd - 27 Nov 2008 14:02 - 4542 of 8631

dil
as long as they have support from existing investors and bankers etc. then getting the cash flow down is critical. the balance sheet write off is immaterial, unless your a very major shareholder of course, which im not.
if i were i would want to see just this for starters or i would withdraw my support. just find rnss in general funny how they talk politic. and confuse between numbers comparisons.. % comparisons in next sentence...followed by fraction comparisons in next sentence etc. then ignore or sidestep others. ie. seem to try never tell a lie yet at the same time find it difficult to tell the truth.
as an aside, both Gareth and JJ had one of the best sidesteps i think i've ever seen.
seems to be last chance saloon for mdx.
regards
jkd

Dil - 27 Nov 2008 14:22 - 4543 of 8631

Balance sheet write off suggests rest of the asset valuations (including) debtors needs looking at jkd.

jkd - 27 Nov 2008 14:51 - 4544 of 8631

dil
thanks for the reminder.
i think we have asked these questions before have we not?
not sure if they ever got answered satisfactory or, if indeed at all.
regards
jkd

Dil - 27 Nov 2008 15:07 - 4545 of 8631

Geez there's some thick tw*ts across the road tabby ... not just you .

tabasco - 27 Nov 2008 22:07 - 4546 of 8631

You might be talking about me across there Dil.I am lucky and thick!

ptholden - 27 Nov 2008 22:37 - 4547 of 8631

Dil, check your email ;)

tabasco - 28 Nov 2008 08:10 - 4548 of 8631

Dil>
your comments across the road have no influence on mdx pis.most that cant be bothered with the banter, filtersome play alongits a discussion forum as the doc says
What has done damage is the five or so posters that get fed inside info into this company with the sole aim to build confidenceOnce the jolly old bait has been taken the insinuations emerge in the form of Gotham Citys The Riddler
2ronnies has only been about a couple of weeks and I would have a private guess at whom he isBargainBobhas posted under other names and does damage.the other usual suspects we all know
I just wish the company would come out of the limelight for a few monthsbut certain people want the shares and they are hard to prise away from this stubborn set of pis. IMHO!

Dil - 28 Nov 2008 09:24 - 4549 of 8631

And what damage did he do ... he posted a fact , not too many of them do that on mdx threads.

Its the rose tinted bullsh*t posted by doc et al that has misled most PI's and cost them money.

tabasco - 28 Nov 2008 10:06 - 4550 of 8631

Dil.I agree to a certain extent the doc can make an assumption.then convince himself he is arguing a point of factI have had disagreements?he is also very helpful at times. as to your other point.it would take me hours to put into words exactly the way these 5 posters operateand I am not clever enough2ronnies stated confidential facts on a bb that only company hierarchy were privy tooBargainBob has played the game before...and is an expertmdx financing aint a problem keep talking about these guys is doing my investment zero good

Dil - 28 Nov 2008 10:08 - 4551 of 8631

And you don't think BM is playing you all ?

I do.

tabasco - 28 Nov 2008 10:27 - 4552 of 8631

What is his game Dil?.he is heavily involved at 68phe was instrumental in getting the KK twins on boardhe has had private meetings with PIs that we all know and has offered the necessary paperwork to prove his positiona lot of investors including myself have had personal promisesbut again there has to be a little trust involvedyou dont believe he is working for a higher SP I with many others doand he has no interest in making further approaches for mdx that is my last comment on that subject!

chocolat - 28 Nov 2008 10:39 - 4553 of 8631

I don't understand why you should assert that discussions on a bb would do your investment zero good, tabs.

The company has been milked of investors' money by a bunch of people, including BJ, who are well practiced in the art. Having any faith in an exhaustive list of product base and its potential under such circumstances is of zero value.

Dil - 28 Nov 2008 11:24 - 4554 of 8631

Get real tabby , he made a stash when it floated and apparently owns next to sweet fa of it at the moment.

He has made a career in floating piles of cr*p none of which imo have gone on to be a success for PI's but he's done allright out of it and that's why he won't answer my question on ADVFN. (his mate Brown has too I think).

Wouldn't be suprised if he bought part of MDX for next to nothing and refloated it. It's no good blaming RT if the foundations were built on sand , thats down to BM and co.

Register now or login to post to this thread.