goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
hilary
- 18 Sep 2014 18:01
- 45919 of 81564
I'd probably concur with that - FX does have a habit of frightening a lot of people away for a variety of reasons, not least because most rookie traders unknowingly over-trade as Alders did today. But that doesn't mean that it should be discounted completely.
goldfinger
- 18 Sep 2014 18:23
- 45920 of 81564
Alders where are you????
Haystack
- 18 Sep 2014 20:07
- 45921 of 81564
Haystack
- 18 Sep 2014 20:18
- 45922 of 81564
Haystack
- 18 Sep 2014 20:31
- 45923 of 81564
aldwickk
- 18 Sep 2014 20:38
- 45924 of 81564
goldfinger
Just read yours and Hil's comment's and will take them on-board, cheer's.
goldfinger
- 18 Sep 2014 21:55
- 45925 of 81564
No probs alders you know you have freinds to call up on.
tomasz
- 19 Sep 2014 07:03
- 45926 of 81564
just got tv on and breaking news says "Scotland votes no...prime minister talking to salmon.." ..what is he says to him...literally -"mega lol"?
MaxK
- 19 Sep 2014 08:43
- 45927 of 81564
more like "how much cash do you want?"
Haystack
- 19 Sep 2014 08:54
- 45928 of 81564
Big gap in favour of no. There is now a strong demand for an England only parliament in exchange for Scotland getting new powers. That will be with no Scottish MPs in our parliament. That, of course, means 41 less Labour MPs, 11 Liberal MPs and 6 SNP MPs. That's pretty much a regular Conservative majority.
Chris Carson
- 19 Sep 2014 08:58
- 45929 of 81564
RESULT!!!
cynic
- 19 Sep 2014 08:58
- 45930 of 81564
not sure if that would be so .... i interpreted as meaning that scottish mp's could only vote on issues affecting the whole union .... or put another way, they would be excluded from those issues over which the "new" scotland had independent control in scotland (i think that makes sense)
Haystack
- 19 Sep 2014 09:02
- 45931 of 81564
Cameron has said this morning that the new powers for Scotland have to be done in the same timetable as changes to our parliament. The news powers are extensive and include income tax, NHS etc. That could means Labour having no influence on major decisions.
Fred1new
- 19 Sep 2014 09:04
- 45932 of 81564
Unravel, the complications of false promises!
Fred1new
- 19 Sep 2014 09:05
- 45933 of 81564
My guess, if there is a referendum on EU as PROMISED by Wavey Dave the result will be similar!
MaxK
- 19 Sep 2014 09:11
- 45934 of 81564
The divil will be in the details....and I bet there will be a few nasty's lurking beneath the surface.
Haystack
- 19 Sep 2014 09:19
- 45935 of 81564
Crushing defeat for Salmond. Only 4 out of 32 councils voted yes. Some areas were 2 to 1 against yes.
VICTIM
- 19 Sep 2014 09:25
- 45936 of 81564
Learnt last night just one vote either way out of those millions would have given a result.
cynic
- 19 Sep 2014 09:27
- 45937 of 81564
in all seriousness, what we do NOT want in england, is any gov't with a crushing majority that will be (far too) difficult to overturn
goldfinger
- 19 Sep 2014 09:40
- 45938 of 81564
HAYS .....you do talk clap trap.
The result was fantastic for labour before the GE.
Lets face it, Gordon Brown as saved Camorons bacon.