markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
chav
- 26 Sep 2010 21:01
- 4669 of 6492
Plenty of upside, should Rachel come good though Marky, at the present sp....if they had Oil already then we would be paying 3.50 odd for them.
Fantastic weather in the FI's still at the moment so the OG should be over Rachel now and gripped for entry.
avsec
- 27 Sep 2010 08:23
- 4671 of 6492
Chav
"OG should be over Rachel now and gripped for entry"
let's keep the smutty comments off this thread...
required field
- 27 Sep 2010 09:16
- 4672 of 6492
So,...anybody shorting for the possible bubble burst ?....
HARRYCAT
- 27 Sep 2010 09:27
- 4673 of 6492
Surely that possibility is over a month away?
HARRYCAT
- 27 Sep 2010 09:36
- 4675 of 6492
DES duster = burst bubble. (RKH value still intact).
(None of the pictures at the top are loading marky).
required field
- 27 Sep 2010 10:04
- 4677 of 6492
I think you must press f11 or f12...Marky....but not sure.....
required field
- 27 Sep 2010 10:11
- 4679 of 6492
Cheers...
HARRYCAT
- 27 Sep 2010 10:17
- 4681 of 6492
All I get is a red X marky! Presumably that marks the spot of the next gusher??? ;o)
avsec
- 27 Sep 2010 10:42
- 4683 of 6492
Just about to do the same Marky but the sun is breaking through here in the SW. DES relatively steady as RKH slips.
chav
- 27 Sep 2010 11:27
- 4684 of 6492
Time DES had a RNS out.
markymar
- 27 Sep 2010 13:06
- 4685 of 6492
Agood post from Synchrouk on iii
Source rock = same as Sealion. The oil has been expelled from above, below and to the side of Rachel. The oil has not had to migrate far. The oil was generated all around the Rachel sand body. The maturity of the source rock has been proved in the Sealion well. No immature oil was found at Sealion, which was a very high pre-drill risk. Mature oil at reservoir depth, means this risk has been removed.
Reservoir = same as Sealion. The sand has been generated in a river, to the east. The sand has been deposited into a Cretaceous lake, on the eastern side of the lake itself. The eastern side of the lake had the deepper water and the water became deeper, quicker, compared to the western side. The organice rich claystones surrounded the Rachel fan. A risk with the reservoir is that the sand grain size distribution is different to Sealion and that this will have a detrimental effect, in so far as the porosity will be different. All the fans drilled in the Sealion well, showed good porosity, so I am confident that this will be the case in Rachel, for the reasons mentioned above, same sand source, same depositional slope gradient.
Seal = same as Sealion. The organic rich Barremian clays were deposited above and below and to the side of the sand body. This meant that the locally prodcued oil could get into the sands, but not escape.
Post Depositional effects = same as Sealion? I have no reason to assume that anything could have happened at Rachel, that would not have happened at Sealion. However, this cannot be ruled out. The main risk to the North Falklands Basin is tuff. A volcanically produced, ash deposit, which can reduce permeability, through chemical alteration, over time. It reduces the ability for a fluid to travel through a rock and may have been present at the Liz location, we will see. Not a great risk, as Sealion did not have this and Sealion is of the same same latitude.
As mentioned previously, I give Rachel a 85% chance of Success.
I'll add some expected STOIIP at some point. These are the current ones from the OUTDATED CPR. I expect the true updated, Rachel predrill figures to be much higher now.
STOIIP
P90 MMbo 163
P50 MMbo 839
P10 MMbo 1892
Mean MMbo 962
Compare these with the pre drill Sealion figures.
STOIIP
P90 MMbo 234
P50 MMbo 568
P10 MMbo 1348
Mean MMbo 710
I'll go into more detail of the geology at a later date also.
required field
- 27 Sep 2010 16:21
- 4686 of 6492
I think that Rockhopper would benefit probably almost as much as Desire Petroleum if they struck a commercial amount of hydrocarbons...but in the event of a no show...DES's sp would be slaughtered ....but RKH's would probably hold up quite well......
chav
- 27 Sep 2010 16:36
- 4687 of 6492
KeywordCompanyEPIC/TIDMSEDOL/ISIN Print Monday 27 September, 2010Desire Petroleum PLC
Rachel 14/15-1 Exploration We
RNS Number : 3822T
Desire Petroleum PLC
27 September 2010
For immediate release
27 September 2010
Desire Petroleum plc
("Desire" or "the Company")
Rachel 14/15-1 Exploration Well Spud
Desire Petroleum plc (AIM:DES), the oil and gas exploration company wholly focused on the North Falkland Basin, is pleased to announce that the Rachel 14/15-1 exploration well was spudded at 15:45 (BST) on 27 September 2010.
The Rachel prospect is located in Tranche D and has an estimated target depth of 2,850 metres. Drilling operations are expected to take approximately 35 days and a further announcement will be made once drilling is completed.