goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 17:40
- 46718 of 81564
FRED said......." Politics then had similarities to now and the thing which surprised me was that he said he always easier and that he made more money under a labour government than a tory one.".......ends
Ohhh absolutely Fred especially in the construction business.
Labour used to make it worthwhile with a package of incentives to build, the Tories claim to offer help but never deliver.
Chris Carson
- 03 Oct 2014 18:04
- 46719 of 81564
Absolutely gf, fabulous profits under Labour, even the Banking Sector. I seem to recall Fred Goodwin being awarded a Knighthood but then ..........Oooopps.
Boom and Bust! Same old, same old!!! :0)
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:12
- 46720 of 81564
LOL its the Tories who created the 'BIG BANG'.... and no thats not you and Hays going for it tooth and nail, you being his rent boy.
The Big Bang was Maggies creation.
The City was Maggies creation, it was the CITY WHO BANKRUPT THIS COUNTRY.
MaxK
- 03 Oct 2014 18:14
- 46721 of 81564
How can you ignore Broon's hand in the bust?
Chris Carson
- 03 Oct 2014 18:15
- 46722 of 81564
LOL!!! Is it in yet Fred? Indeed, indeed! :O)
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2014 18:17
- 46723 of 81564
And what a mess the Labour appointees made of Co-op bank!
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:18
- 46724 of 81564
We all know when you have been beaten in the debate Chris, stick to the golf course and the 12 year old boys.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:20
- 46725 of 81564
HAYS LOL LOL LOL and tell me what was Osbourne trying to do then just 2 months ago.
ANYWAY youve lied you said you have me on filter.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:21
- 46726 of 81564
Max sorry bud, youve been badly informed. Would you like the evidence????????????????
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2014 18:22
- 46727 of 81564
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ukip-is-serious-threat-to-ed-milibands-chances-of-a-labour-victory-at-the-next-general-election-former-aide-warns-9770790.html
Ukip poses a "serious threat" to Labour’s chances of victory at next May’s general election, a former aide to Ed Miliband reports.
A forensic study of the electoral map published by the Labour-affiliated Fabian Society rejects claims by some senior party figures that Nigel Farage could help Labour regain power because most of his party’s supporters are former Conservative voters. It says many of these people are in safe Tory seats and so their flight to Ukip will not affect the election’s outcome.
In contrast, it concludes that Ukip’s “rising tide” already poses a “very serious” threat to Labour’s hopes in 22 key marginal constituencies the party hopes to win, while the Tories are under serious threat in only 11 key seats.
In total, there are 59 seats where a surge in Ukip support has the potential to seriously impair Labour’s prospects, including 39 Conservative-Labour marginals. Although Mr Farage’s party could potentially damage Tory prospects in 67 seats, only 13 of these are Tory-held seats on Labour’s target list.
Marcus Roberts, the Fabians’ deputy general secretary, who worked on Mr Miliband’s 2010 Labour leadership campaign, says in his report: “Labour has few reasons to cheer about the Ukip insurgency and plenty to worry about… A strong Ukip result presents Labour with many chances to lose, and few to gain.”
He concludes: “Ukip poses a clear and present danger to Labour’s 2015 hopes and, left unchecked, could threaten to pull apart the party’s historic electoral coalition and challenge it in large swathes of its heartland territory.”
Chris Carson
- 03 Oct 2014 18:25
- 46728 of 81564
Beaten in the debate what debate would that be then? All I read is constant verbal shite from you and Fred, it's pathetic! If the Labour Party was a stock you would both be vilified for constant ramping. You could give the boiler room scumsters a good run for their money.
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2014 18:26
- 46729 of 81564
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:26
- 46730 of 81564
LOL Tory newspapers again.
Come up North if you dare Hays and visit the clubs and bars.........UKIP my ass taking labour votes, not in your life, but certainly Tory voters.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:28
- 46731 of 81564
CHRISTINE C who was responsible then for the 2008 crash????
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:35
- 46732 of 81564
Hurry up Chris my pheasant is going cold.
Chris Carson
- 03 Oct 2014 18:43
- 46733 of 81564
You talking to me? Tell you who it wasn't. The Tories. And you will argue it wasn't Labour despite the evidence. Bored already, it's history. Move on.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 18:44
- 46734 of 81564
Tory Boys all gone quiet.
Set Fred Set.
hilary
- 03 Oct 2014 18:49
- 46735 of 81564
fishfinger - 03 Oct 2014 18:28 - 46733 of 46736
who was responsible then for the 2008 crash????
Darling Alistair and The One Eyed Scottish Monster!
hilary
- 03 Oct 2014 18:54
- 46736 of 81564
Or maybe you're not interested in hearing about how they failed to burst a debt-fuelled bubble before it got too big. Or about their scorched earth policy which left the country without a pot to piss in, and which meant the incoming government were unable to implement some of the Keynesian policies that would have helped ease the problem.
goldfinger
- 03 Oct 2014 19:16
- 46737 of 81564
Hilary honestly I didnt want to get you involved here, but if the men cant stand up for themselves i suppose they have to use a women to protect them (nothing malicious meant)and your supporting a group of wimps, well bar cynic.