Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Chris Carson - 05 Oct 2014 17:43 - 46851 of 81564

The crescendo of support is sadly lacking PURPLE, you have been found out, deal with it.

doodlebug4 - 05 Oct 2014 17:44 - 46852 of 81564

Fred, I agree with quite a lot of your comments, but I cannot understand when you obviously feel so strongly about politics that you don't vote. Why?

Fred1new - 05 Oct 2014 17:50 - 46853 of 81564

DB4,

I see the problems with my own conclusions.

I also have a sneaking liking for:

"Yours is to reason why, but not to do or die!"

I have difficulty with beliefs! Which are often momentary.

-----

That it why I enjoy middle games more than endgames!

8-)

Chris Carson - 05 Oct 2014 17:53 - 46854 of 81564

Purple you back in the classroom, Sir, Sir hand up. Yorkshire WIMP!

Haystack - 05 Oct 2014 17:53 - 46855 of 81564

We are seeing the start of Labour's slide into the bottomless pit from where there is no return.

cynic - 05 Oct 2014 17:56 - 46856 of 81564

stop talking the same sort of rubbish as do fred and sticky!

goldfinger - 05 Oct 2014 18:01 - 46857 of 81564

Yes Hays yes.

Two polls in the Sunday papers. The weekly YouGov/Sunday Times poll has topline figures of CON 36%, LAB 34%, LDEM 7%, UKIP 13%. That means both the YouGov polls since Cameron’s conference speech have shown a small Tory lead, though it’s worth noting that that the Populus poll on Friday did not show any movement to the Conservatives so the trend is not all one way. The more important caveat is that the polls were taken in the context of very good publicity for the Conservatives from their conference – we don’t know if it will last once the agenda moves on to, say, the expected UKIP by-election win on Thursday.

Haystack - 05 Oct 2014 18:05 - 46858 of 81564

Of course. You have to be optimistic. If Cameron manages to exclude Scottish MPs from voting on English affairs, it won't even matter if Labour win from time to time at a GE. Even a Labour budget would get voted down. England would become ungovernable by Labour. If we get a Conservative government this time, it will put through the constituency boundary changes that it wanted to this time, but the Libs reneged because they didn't get their Lords reform. The changes will result in quite a few lost Labour seats and a couple of Tory and Lib seats.

Fred1new - 05 Oct 2014 18:12 - 46859 of 81564

Victim

VICTIM - 02 Oct 2014 10:29 - 46655 of 46859

If the Cons get in again Fred, will you be happy . It just seems that if they don't you will have lots of time on your hands.


========

Apologies. missed the post.

8-)

Absence may make the heart grow fonder!

also,

"The devil finds work for idle hands."


So watch out!

====

Truth is the Labour party has such a hammering in the media, they need a little help and giving it, appeals to me!


Especially, when it irritates Manuel!

cynic - 05 Oct 2014 18:26 - 46860 of 81564

your very silly rantings don't irritate me at all except insofar as they take up so much space

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 18:49 - 46861 of 81564

Who is purple?

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 18:53 - 46862 of 81564

No sooner have the jocks said no, up pops another wee beastie...




Sturgeon: Devo max will bring independence closer




Sunday 5 October 2014



Scottish independence is a matter of "when, not if" - particularly if unionist parties deliver on their vow of substantial new powers for Holyrood, Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said.




Devolution of the financial, economic and welfare powers implicit in unionist pledges of "home rule" will render future "scaremongering" over Scotland's capacity for self-government "risible", according to Ms Sturgeon, who is almost certain to be Scotland's next first minister.


But she recognised that Westminster faces a difficult task in delivering powers which it claimed "would cause the sky to fall in" before the referendum.

Ms Sturgeon will today face calls to rule out a rapid second referendum by Scottish Secretary Alistair Carmichael, who has already warned nationalists against arguing for "independence by the back door" in the forthcoming Smith Commission negotiations on more powers.

Writing in left-wing periodical Scottish Left Review, Ms Sturgeon said: "There is no going back - and much as they might have wanted to, Whitehall politicians and mandarins cannot put us back in a devolved box.

"The word 'devolution' is no longer adequate, for that describes a process of handing down carefully circumscribed powers from on high to a relatively passive people.

"Scotland is now more politically engaged and assertive than at any stage of the democratic era."



More: http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/scottish-politics/sturgeon-extra-powers-promised-by-unionist-parties-will-bring-independenc.1412505388

doodlebug4 - 05 Oct 2014 18:53 - 46863 of 81564

Perhaps gf would like to answer that question MaxK, but I doubt it. (Post 46863)

doodlebug4 - 05 Oct 2014 19:40 - 46864 of 81564

Sturgeon could be an absolute nightmare for the Labour party in Scotland. Salmond will seem like a pussycat in comparison.

Fred1new - 05 Oct 2014 20:15 - 46865 of 81564

Did Salmond confuse Cameron by purring?

doodlebug4 - 05 Oct 2014 20:21 - 46866 of 81564

Perhaps Fred, but Sturgeon has serious claws!

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 23:40 - 46867 of 81564

PETER HITCHENS: The Dave diet: hair gel, snake oil and terminological inexactitudes

By Peter Hitchens

Published: 00:49, 5 October 2014


'Snake-oil and hair gel': The Prime Minister wore a Help For Heroes wristband during his conference speech in Birmingham on Wednesday, despite needlessly prolonging the peril of British troops in Afghanistan


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2780929/PETER-HITCHENS-The-Dave-diet-hair-gel-snake-oil-terminological-inexactitudes.html



How odd it would be to actually watch Oxford beat Cambridge by a mile in the boat race, and then open the papers next morning and read that Cambridge had won.

Last week was a bit like that for me. I watched the Tory conference carefully. And then I read the papers, and it was all plain wrong.

Take this quotation, from a Tory document, describing the ‘key objectives’ of their planned new bill on ‘Human Rights’.

One of them is to ‘put the text of the original Human Rights convention into primary legislation’. In other words, the Tories plan to make Human Rights a permanent part of our constitution. Is that what you thought they were doing?

It goes on to say: ‘There is nothing wrong with that original document.’ Is that what you thought they thought? Because it is.

The only way to escape the ‘Human Rights’ curse is to abolish it entirely, and rely (as we did when we were truly free and independent) on our own well-tried laws, forged in centuries of constitutional battle.

Canada, which has its own homegrown ‘Charter Of Rights And Freedoms’, modelled on the European one, is just as entangled in liberal drivel as we are. It’s not where the Charter comes from that’s the problem. It’s what it is.

You have deliberately been given a wholly false impression of what is planned – and, alas, much of the media has joined in the deception.


There are other falsehoods. Perhaps the worst and most wounding for a British patriot is Mrs Theresa May’s plan to ban ‘extremists’ from the airwaves and the internet. What is an extremist? Why, anyone the Government says is one. I might be one. You might be one.

What joy this idea must have given the Chinese despots currently resisting peaceful demands for more freedom in Hong Kong.

I can just imagine the glee with which they will throw back any British protests at repression, by saying how much they admire Mrs May’s reintroduction of medieval tyranny into our penal code. For this disgraceful outburst, Mrs May was praised as a possible future premier by choirs of sycophants.

But then we must come to that great streak of snake-oil and hair gel, the Prime Minister’s speech in Birmingham on Wednesday. I confess I swore at the TV set several times, enraged by his sheer nerve.

His ostentatious wearing of a Help For Heroes wristband after needlessly prolonging the peril of British troops in Afghanistan was particularly repulsive to me.

I hope his endorsement did not harm that excellent charity too much, though I have never understood why wounded soldiers should need to rely upon charity for their care.




Haystack - 06 Oct 2014 00:30 - 46868 of 81564

Does anyone take Peter Hitchens seriously? I doubt it.

goldfinger - 06 Oct 2014 02:29 - 46869 of 81564

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 18:49 - 46863 of 46870

Who is purple?.............................ends

At a guess the prolific poster known as Stigoligist across the road, who as a reputation for inflaming situations.


Its a shame the 2 dim wits on here without an ounce of grey matter between them cant work that one out for you Max.

cynic - 06 Oct 2014 08:32 - 46870 of 81564

middle east
why things are almost never as simple as they look on the surface ....

Isis Militants 'Plotting to seize Iran's Nuclear Secrets with Russia's Help'
Register now or login to post to this thread.