Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 05 Oct 2014 20:15 - 46865 of 81564

Did Salmond confuse Cameron by purring?

doodlebug4 - 05 Oct 2014 20:21 - 46866 of 81564

Perhaps Fred, but Sturgeon has serious claws!

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 23:40 - 46867 of 81564

PETER HITCHENS: The Dave diet: hair gel, snake oil and terminological inexactitudes

By Peter Hitchens

Published: 00:49, 5 October 2014


'Snake-oil and hair gel': The Prime Minister wore a Help For Heroes wristband during his conference speech in Birmingham on Wednesday, despite needlessly prolonging the peril of British troops in Afghanistan


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2780929/PETER-HITCHENS-The-Dave-diet-hair-gel-snake-oil-terminological-inexactitudes.html



How odd it would be to actually watch Oxford beat Cambridge by a mile in the boat race, and then open the papers next morning and read that Cambridge had won.

Last week was a bit like that for me. I watched the Tory conference carefully. And then I read the papers, and it was all plain wrong.

Take this quotation, from a Tory document, describing the ‘key objectives’ of their planned new bill on ‘Human Rights’.

One of them is to ‘put the text of the original Human Rights convention into primary legislation’. In other words, the Tories plan to make Human Rights a permanent part of our constitution. Is that what you thought they were doing?

It goes on to say: ‘There is nothing wrong with that original document.’ Is that what you thought they thought? Because it is.

The only way to escape the ‘Human Rights’ curse is to abolish it entirely, and rely (as we did when we were truly free and independent) on our own well-tried laws, forged in centuries of constitutional battle.

Canada, which has its own homegrown ‘Charter Of Rights And Freedoms’, modelled on the European one, is just as entangled in liberal drivel as we are. It’s not where the Charter comes from that’s the problem. It’s what it is.

You have deliberately been given a wholly false impression of what is planned – and, alas, much of the media has joined in the deception.


There are other falsehoods. Perhaps the worst and most wounding for a British patriot is Mrs Theresa May’s plan to ban ‘extremists’ from the airwaves and the internet. What is an extremist? Why, anyone the Government says is one. I might be one. You might be one.

What joy this idea must have given the Chinese despots currently resisting peaceful demands for more freedom in Hong Kong.

I can just imagine the glee with which they will throw back any British protests at repression, by saying how much they admire Mrs May’s reintroduction of medieval tyranny into our penal code. For this disgraceful outburst, Mrs May was praised as a possible future premier by choirs of sycophants.

But then we must come to that great streak of snake-oil and hair gel, the Prime Minister’s speech in Birmingham on Wednesday. I confess I swore at the TV set several times, enraged by his sheer nerve.

His ostentatious wearing of a Help For Heroes wristband after needlessly prolonging the peril of British troops in Afghanistan was particularly repulsive to me.

I hope his endorsement did not harm that excellent charity too much, though I have never understood why wounded soldiers should need to rely upon charity for their care.




Haystack - 06 Oct 2014 00:30 - 46868 of 81564

Does anyone take Peter Hitchens seriously? I doubt it.

goldfinger - 06 Oct 2014 02:29 - 46869 of 81564

MaxK - 05 Oct 2014 18:49 - 46863 of 46870

Who is purple?.............................ends

At a guess the prolific poster known as Stigoligist across the road, who as a reputation for inflaming situations.


Its a shame the 2 dim wits on here without an ounce of grey matter between them cant work that one out for you Max.

cynic - 06 Oct 2014 08:32 - 46870 of 81564

middle east
why things are almost never as simple as they look on the surface ....

Isis Militants 'Plotting to seize Iran's Nuclear Secrets with Russia's Help'

MaxK - 06 Oct 2014 09:04 - 46871 of 81564

Where did that come from c?


Sounds like a kite.

cynic - 06 Oct 2014 09:12 - 46872 of 81564

sunday times
i'll c+p the whole article if you want

MaxK - 06 Oct 2014 09:32 - 46874 of 81564

Yes please c.

MaxK - 06 Oct 2014 09:36 - 46875 of 81564

Thought so, bollox of the purest ray serene.


http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-militants-plotting-seize-irans-nuclear-secrets-russias-help-1468557

aldwickk - 06 Oct 2014 09:44 - 46876 of 81564

Didn't read it but the headline tell's me its a load of rubbish, it doesn't make sense that the Russians would help.

cynic - 06 Oct 2014 09:48 - 46877 of 81564

Isis militants in Iraq plan to invade Iran to seize details of its nuclear programme and give it to Moscow, in exchange for help defeating Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, the Sunday Times claims.

Haystack - 06 Oct 2014 09:56 - 46879 of 81564

Why would Russia want Iran's nuclear secrets? They have all the nuclear technology that they need. Iran are not at the forefront of nuclear research. This looks like a planted story by a third country and I have my suspicions as to the source and motive. The suggested motives look very suspect as Russia supports Assad as it is their only area of influence in the ME.

ExecLine - 06 Oct 2014 10:30 - 46880 of 81564

Are there any volunteers on here who might want to help the NHS with a Medical Trial?

Goldfinger?
Haystack?
Fred1New?
Hilary?

Haystack - 06 Oct 2014 10:57 - 46881 of 81564

Not a bad idea. I could do with a smaller one.

doodlebug4 - 06 Oct 2014 11:13 - 46882 of 81564

What exactly did you type into a search engine to find that link ExecLine?!

Haystack - 06 Oct 2014 11:27 - 46883 of 81564

Let us hope that Labour does this as Johnson would be just as and maybe more unelectable than Milibland.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11141992/Labour-MPs-urge-Alan-Johnson-to-challenge-for-leader-amid-growing-disgruntlement-with-Ed-Miliband.html

Labour MPs urge Alan Johnson to challenge for leader amid growing disgruntlement with Ed Miliband

Frustrated MPs tell The Telegraph Miliband's leadership is a 'tragedy' and say the 'country would give a cheer' if former home secretary launched a challenge

doodlebug4 - 06 Oct 2014 11:34 - 46884 of 81564

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/john-prescott-leads-labour-attacks-on-timid-ed-miliband-after-poll-puts-tories-ahead-9776047.html
Register now or login to post to this thread.