Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

This is Haystack's hero, lying his way out of a referendum.

Nothing to do with the Lib/Dims.

You cant trust a word that comes out of Cameroon's mouth when it comes to the €U.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1JReyGsdOA

You obviously don't know the history of the referendum. Cameron did promise a referendum. It was about what was being agreed in the Lisbon Treaty. In the event the Labour party not only signed the treaty, but deliberately gave away our veto to stop future governments changing it.

Because of what Labour did, we have no scope to change or not accept EU legislation. The Conservatives removed the promise for a referendum from their manifesto for 2010. There was no point in having a referendum as we could not veto the Lisbon treaty by then.

This new referendum is very different. It will be about IN or OUT.

The party that lied about a referendum was Labour. There were negotiations leading to a treaty called the Maastricht treaty. In the event Ireland voted against it in their referendum. Some other countries were likely to vote against it. Labour had promised us a vote as well. The treaty collapsed. A new treaty was thought up and called the Lisbon Treaty. It was about 95% the same as the old one. Ireland revoted and agreed to it. Labour then changed their mind and reneged on their promise. They used the excuse that they only promised a referendum for the Maastricht treaty and the Lisbon treaty was a different treaty and they were not bound by their promise.

You mean that Blair was as duplicitous as Cameron is!

Wonders never cease!

To me the reason for a Boris (Il Duce) safe seat election is so that he can be moved into a front bench position .....he's very good for London....I'd prefer him remaining mayor....and I agree with his longterm estuary airport....in the meantime another runway at Gatwick is probably the best solution...but in a few decades the Heathrow switch to the estuary will become a must.....

Cameroon has stated that he wants to stay in regardless of any outcome on renegotiation.

With an opening position like that, who needs a cast iron guarantee?

Indeed, the only outcome possible is more of the same.


Something else smelly under the €U matress:

http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2014/09/12/comment-outrage-as-eu-blocks-democratic-challenge-to-us-trad


I'm sure Dave is relaxed about that as well.

Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie
Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie Shortie

I would suggest those who iconise Farage should perhaps view :

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04lxvrd


and afterwards review their opinion of him!

Not so

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/11127157/I-could-campaign-to-leave-the-EU-warns-David-Cameron.html

I could campaign to leave the EU, warns David Cameron


The Prime Minister has indicated that he is prepared to campaign for Britain to leave the European Union if he is unable to successfully renegotiate powers

David Cameron has signalled that he is prepared to campaign for Britain to leave the European Union if he is unable to successfully renegotiate its relationship with Brussels.

Everything to everybody and nothing in himself comes to mind!

USA TODAY


World Health Organization Director-General Margaret Chan issued a statement Monday at a conference in Manila.
She said development of a vaccine or cure for Ebola has lagged because the virus is prevalent in such poor nations.

"The outbreak spotlights the dangers of the world's growing social and economic inequalities," Chan said. "The rich get the best care. The poor are left to die."

She said the outbreak is disrupting economies and societies around the world. She said 90% of economic costs of any outbreak "come from irrational and disorganized efforts of the public to avoid infection."
Adequately educating the public should allow governments to curb those disruptions, Chan said. Fear, she said, spreads faster than any virus.
"I have never before seen a health event attract such a high level of
international media coverage, day after day after day," Chan said. "I have never seen a health event strike such fear and terror, well beyond the affected countries."

DB4.

remember "the UK is an Island unto itself"!

"Pirates on the seas"

I'm sure Margaret Chan is well protected from a chance encounter with ebola carrying victims.

No so the rest of us.


Why are they still allowing air travel from infected areas?

Economics!

Economics Fred?


Or do you mean ... gulp! Money?

ebola is not that easy to catch ..... it's not like flu

Cynic absolutely correct, your at higher risk of contracting malaria than ebola in West Africa

It's amazing the number of 'educated' people who don't seem to understand that cynic.