overgrowth
- 09 Feb 2005 20:52
Dowgate Capital (DGT) are sitting
in the middle of a goldmine!
This company through
their sole trading arm City Financial Associates are looking to take full
advantage of the "booming" AIM market this year.
Dowgate provide NOMAD (NOMinated ADvisor) services to AIM companies
and also have full Corporate Broker status which means that they can fund
placements on behalf of the companies they represent.
|
|
On first sight, the
fact that Dowgate exist in the often veiled financial services sector
makes you think twice about investing in company such as this because
it would be impossible to understand what they were doing - however, think
again!
DGT bring new companies
to the AIM (Alternative Investment Market). For each new company "floated"
on AIM, they take arrangement fees when acting as NOMAD. After the company
is launched then for a nice steady earner DGT get another healthy chunk
of cash every year for looking after them (note that all AIM companies
must have a nominated adviser - thereby securing a ready source of recurring
income).
Because DGT also act
as a Corporate broker they can get a very healthy percentage for arranging
placement of shares with insititutions before a new company floats. In
addition, because placements come outside the sphere of yearly NOMAD work,
they can also gain healthy percentages of placements which companies may
need to make throughout the year when they need a quick injection of cash
to speed growth.
Current NOMADships:
28 companies represented (gives recurring income of approx 480,000
per year)
Current on-going Brokerage
agreements: 19 companies (income depends on placements)
For flotations, depending
on the size of a company, fees charged will be anything from 50,000
to 100,000+
For placements (the real earner), DGT get anything from 3% to around 12%
of the TOTAL AMOUNT RAISED - For example a new company raising 3M
though a placement will earn DGT anything from 90,000 to 360,000
!
These figures are indicative as actual deals all differ due to circumstances
and DGT sometimes take payment in shares - they still have a tasty chunk
of Setstone shares and when this Russian exploration company comes back
to AIM, predictions are that the share price will rocket.
Note that the amount that this little company can earn in fees is huge
and every new deal that comes through we know will contribute another
healthy chunk into the bottom line. The good news with every new floatation
means that it's another chunk of recurring revenue which could go on for
years, with DGT having to do very little.
New clients gained in 2005 are:
Mediazest
(NOMAD & broker) Elite Strategies (NOMAD) Process Handling (NOMAD) Poland Investment Fund (NOMAD) Nanotech Energy (NOMAD & broker) Archimedia Ventures (NOMAD & broker) Red Leopard Holdings (NOMAD) Alba Mineral Resources (NOMAD & broker) Intandem Films (NOMAD & broker) Motive Television (NOMAD) IncaGold (NOMAD) Sportswinbet (NOMAD & Broker) Infoscreen Networks (NOMAD & Broker) Mark Kingsley (NOMAD & Broker) Croatia Ventures (NOMAD & Broker) Pantheon Leisure (NOMAD) Firenze Ventures (Ofex Advisor) FlightStore Group (NOMAD & Broker) Euro Capital Projects (NOMAD) Pearl Street Holdings (NOMAD) Worldwide Natural Resources (Ofex Advisor) Dovedale Ventures (Ofex Advisor) Other 2005 work completed:Neptune-Calculus VCT offer for subs of up to 12 million
Advisory work for TGM on London Bus disposal for 20.4M
Advisory work for Creightons on property disposal
Advisory work for Hampton Trust on company restructuring
Advisory work for Interbulk Investments on acquisition of
Inbulk Advisory work for Fundamental-e
Investments on two disposals Advisory work for Designer
Vision re: Design Rights against Centurion Electronics
Click Here for fundamentals and profit projections.
|

arawli
- 28 Apr 2005 20:51
- 479 of 2787
Now that is a nice thought 36p a share. Maybe in a few years if the floats keep coming in as the have first half.
Does anyone know if Hawaii is for sale???LOL
No T trade tonight do I smell and RNS in the morning?
Good Look
Andy
corehard
- 29 Apr 2005 15:24
- 480 of 2787
Not too much of an upward trend today !
panic
- 29 Apr 2005 15:52
- 481 of 2787
Afternoon girls & boys, Just come home, been chatting at work and this one was mentioned so checking out the thread found some sensible names I know from the SEo thread, so I'm in, but my buy on checking the trades went through as a sell so possibly there may be more, definitly looking foreward to that 36p og, well I can dream cant I?
EWRobson
- 29 Apr 2005 19:06
- 482 of 2787
I like that: just come home to CFP! Very homely sort of share with homespun people. No presumption or acrimony. Just tuck away the odd million and wait for the good times to come!
Eric
white westie
- 01 May 2005 00:01
- 483 of 2787
I posted this on the other thread any comments?.
Just received the annual report through the post this morning and on looking through it quickly i have noticed the following points,
I see that Barclay and Shaw have been allowed to retain their unapproved share options of 10,100,000 for Barclay and 7,600,000 for Shaw which is nearly 3% of the company between them, they lost their approved and EMI options but were allowed to keep the above.
As for the warrants it looks like they keep their warrant options until 12th June 2006 i am not sure how to read this but it looks to me like Barclay is allowed 61% and Shaw 30.5% of the available warrants if they wish to take them up so they could still have over a 3% stake in the company when we thought we had got rid of them with the payoff, but at least they are off the payroll now.
Look on page 16 and see what they were paid Barclays total was 242,414 thats more than Rawlison,Buckley and Horner put together and Shaw got 107,506 thats 350k for the year which is approx what it cost to pay them off.
Barclay had a total pay rise from last year of just over 93k no wonder we were struggling to make a profit with that sort of yearly rise in a tiny company all he was doing was looking after number 1.
On page 21 it lists warrant we have options to subscribe to for ordinary shares in some of companies we have floated but i cannot see anywhere a list about the shares in companies we took as part payment for works, i am thinking mainly of Setstone as we had 12M, do we still have them?
In the notice at the back about the forthcoming AGM i see there is a special resolution if agreed to change the name from CFA Capital Group Plc to Dowgate Capital Plc where did that come from?
I am going to read the report through again to see if i have missed any thing else i did not know.
Anyone else who got their reports today? have you got any comments?
ww
ranoszek
- 01 May 2005 08:46
- 484 of 2787
there has been talk of US companies floating on AIM. Wonder if name change will draw potential customers (subliminal message).
There was speculation of some US tie up when SB was in the States --or was he there having a good time on company expenses?
is dowgate domain available or is work in progress already?
EWRobson
- 01 May 2005 13:25
- 485 of 2787
ww: interesting comment. Will have a browse through the report. The point about Barclay's and Shaw's roles was that they would build the holding company, rpesumably buying in companies to become rounded suppliers of finance and services and perhaps even a merchant bank. When CFP ran into trouble with specific clients in Q3 last year, they made for the exit. They were far better at lining their own pockets than building a rounded company. I don't think the warrants are a problem. Essentially they have put the company back a year or so but I think it is much more sensibly based than a year ago and could well be at a similar valuation.
Eric
white westie
- 01 May 2005 19:29
- 486 of 2787
EWRobson,
What do you make of the proposed name change? why change it?
EWRobson
- 01 May 2005 21:30
- 487 of 2787
ww: No strong view. Maybe the current name is too generic. Dowgate? Dow plus gate. Dow could be clever. Gate is a sort of guardian word and has London city connotations. New York + London! Going places? Can't get much more generic than that.
deadfred
- 02 May 2005 13:36
- 490 of 2787
this is just an opinion
as ive said before this has the smell of farm all over it
just my opinion but seems funny that after the top man sells his shares and causes a major panic in the share price(which has still not gained much in retro of not bad finals)
seems a bit rum that he should still be onto more than 3% of company after this according to posted threads(if i was the(and its only an opinion) director id say tough turd sb take me to court and cancel the share,warrants options(would be interesting to see what kind of answers we would get on a few questions id like the company to ask ) just an opinion mind))
as for name change well lets just say if mud sticks better having a wash
remember this is just an opinion we all have them
and as i said before the dead is keeping an eye on this one
moneyplus
- 02 May 2005 13:36
- 491 of 2787
It will lose the baggage of past directors and hopefully raise a positive note in the city.
white westie
- 02 May 2005 14:00
- 492 of 2787
I have been reading through the report again and i have picked out another item which seems very strange,
On page 4 under Substantial Shareholders there is only 1 listing and that is
GHW GROUP PLC who hold 41,227,500 shares 6.66% of the company.
What has happened to PERSHING KEEN NOMINEE's 2 holdings of,
92,839,000 16.75%
27,820,000 5.02%
as listed in the last report as we have not had any RNS about their disposal since then, as that equates to 120,659,000 shares about 19.5% of the company if you add those to the 53,000,000 missing from the SB/JS/ Griffin and GHW transactions
we have a total of 173,659,000 approx unaccounted for and i know we have not had enough buys since the begining of the year to account for all those shares plus that does not take into account all the sells since January as well.
If Pershing had disposed of those shares we would have to be told so what is going on here something does not add up to me.
I think an e mail to TR would be in order to clarify the matter, maybe Propane could do so as he seems to have got a good repore with TR and we do not need eveyone e-mailing him as he is a busy man.
that is unless anyone on this BB can throw some light on the matter posted above as i cannot make any sense of it.
ww.
arawli
- 02 May 2005 16:05
- 493 of 2787
WW
I am not 100% sure but I seem to remember that the Pershing holding had something to do with SB/JS holding were they also listed last year on the holders above 3% ? If not it could have been their holdings
Just a thought
Andy
white westie
- 02 May 2005 17:36
- 494 of 2787
arawli,
they were listed in last years report as substantial shareholders in addition to the directors holding so nothing to do with SB/JS holdings.
butane
- 02 May 2005 21:20
- 495 of 2787
white westie, Actually,i think it's arawli who seems to be in touch with TR, i have emailed TR previously and on occasions not had a reply...
white westie
- 02 May 2005 21:45
- 496 of 2787
Sorry butane you are right it is arawli who emails TR and get a reply fairly quick, i got it wrong. perhaps he will be good enough to try and find out for us to clarify the situation.
butane
- 02 May 2005 21:50
- 497 of 2787
white westie, This is from the Hemscott site, it is up to date showing TR's latest holding but i dont know why SB is appearing on the list???
CFA Capital Group PLC
Major Shareholders
Shares in issue: 619.0m 0.25p Ords
Major Shareholders Amount % Holding
S Barclay 64,600,000 10.44
GHW Group PLC 41,227,500 6.66
Anthony Paul Rawlinson 21,500,000 3.47
Other Directors Amount % Holding
Ian Carysfort Buckley 2,500,000 0.404
David Alistair Horner 300,000 0.048
= Director