Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Sorry Max you are wrong Hays for once is right.

eg, how are you going to stop IS suicide terrorists infecting themselves, staying as sleepers for 3 weeks then going into airports blowing themselves up and spreading there bodily fluid????????????????????????????

Its quite simple Doodlebug4 couldnt give a dam about these poor people from dying from this terrible disease all he wants to do is PROTECT HIS INVESTMENT IN FLYBE

hes a sick individual who needs therapy.

Max please, now that you are associating yourself with Doodlebug4 could please ask him the following question.......

Doodlebug4 ARE YOU CHRISTOPHER HOLDEN????????????????

You can spend more on Ebola effectively by doing more of what we are doing. That is setting up modern treatment centres and providing medical staff and medicine. The difficult side of Ebola is tracing contacts. That is fairly easy in a western environment. In a relatively primitive area it is extremely difficult. Plus there is the suspicion and stigma surrounding the disease. There have been cases of people breaking into the treatment complexes to 'free' people who have been taken there.

Very true Hays breaking out there children and other loved ones.

I cannot understand why it wouldn't have been easier and more cost effective to stop people travelling from the infected countries to other parts of the world until the virus was under control. Instead of which we now have a ludicrous situation whereby nurses and health care workers , who have been working in these countries and have been in direct contact with the virus, seem to be free to travel anywhere they wish.

Which doesnt include Regional Airlines like FLYBE. (filter off)

Ohhhhhhhh he can be read like a book.

It is difficult to stop them travelling. The borders of the countries are not secure. You can't isolate several complete countries.

I did think it would be impossible to carry on a civilised debate on this thread without constant interruptions. So much for the supposed use of the filter facility.

Doodlebug aka Holden digging and digging himself further into a hole. (back on filter)

Doodlebug4 just answer the question everyone wants to know are you the multi handle poster Christopher Holden???????????????????? Its not a trick question.

So why can some countries stop them from travelling and not this country? Is it simply because this country is so lax with border controls?

We don't have direct flights to here. The problem is where people have been before. Other countries are not stopping people either.

The ISIS terrorist are going through Turkey and getting into Europe that way.

Wont be long Im sad to say we will have our first cases.

Thank for that Haystack. I'm sure you have had enough of this now with all the noise going on in the background.

Hays just accept your on a hiding to nothing here, all Doodlebug cares about his the investment he as in FLYBE.

He'l lie through his teeth to try and protect that, hes using you as a pawn and will no doubt be using your quotes to his advantage over the road on advfn at sometime this weekend copying and pasting at will.

Wise up hes a scumster who just looks after nos 1.

Doodlebug4 ARE YOU CHRISTOPHER HOLDEN????????????????
goldfinger Send an email to goldfinger View goldfinger's profile - 17 Oct 2014 20:54 - 47954 of 47984 edit this post

Doodlebug4 are you the poster using the handle Stigologist, ??????????????
goldfinger Send an email to goldfinger View goldfinger's profile - 17 Oct 2014 20:57 - 47955 of 47984 edit this post

Doodlebug4..... do you deny you have posted disgraceful, abusive comments & sent abusive emails using a myriad of fake, false identities. (One of Holden's wheezes is to sign up the site admin for sexually explicit material.)?????????????????????????????

MaxK thanks for your post 47963 - appreciated.

Common sense db, when you find yourself in a hole.....

LOL Max, think about it doodlebug.

Who wants to support a self interested plonker like you who only cares about Nos 1.

Its a shame but society as gone that way since the 1990s, forget your neighbour walk over them in the gutter on the street. Let them die as long as you are OK.

People are fed up with that, they want a more tolerable society and fair society only tonight the FED chief Janet Yelin as spoken about this were she wants income redistributed down to the lower classes.

Cheats like you (doodlebug) will be found out in the end and sympathisers like Max owt to take note.

A cynical stunt that backfired on Labour

By Daily Mail Comment

Published: 01:20, 18 October 2014 | Updated: 01:23, 18 October 2014











View
comments




After shrilly demanding the resignation of the welfare minister Lord Freud for causing ‘great offence’ to the disabled, Labour’s Angela Eagle sat back with a smirk and waited for the thunderous applause of the BBC’s Question Time audience on Thursday evening.

It never came. Instead, this political lightweight found herself being bitterly rebuked for the shameless opportunism displayed by Ed Miliband’s party.

One audience member rightly accused Labour of being ‘extremely disingenuous’ in its attacks. Another was cheered loudly for lambasting Red Ed’s ‘disgusting’ and ‘hypocritical point-scoring’.



Angela Eagle found herself being bitterly rebuked for the shameless opportunism displayed by Ed Miliband's party
















+1
Angela Eagle found herself being bitterly rebuked for the shameless opportunism displayed by Ed Miliband's party

Yes, Lord Freud’s language was terribly misjudged – given the choice again, he would surely rephrase his comment that some disabled workers are not ‘worth’ the minimum wage.

But his point, as the public understood, was that it is neither compassionate nor fair to the disabled if the requirement for employers to pay £6.50 an hour is depriving them of the chance to find work.





RELATED ARTICLES

Previous


1


Next



DAILY MAIL COMMENT: The only way to make the eurocrats listen


JAN MOIR: Football's vile rapist must NEVER get his old job back


Indeed, far from seeking to pay them £2 an hour – as Labour disgracefully suggested – Lord Freud was debating the case for the State to top up their wages, so they had the dignity and fulfilment of a job.

Labour, which in 2003 proposed paying people with mental illness £4 a day, was not alone in feigning outrage.

Predictably, Nick Clegg claimed to find the remarks ‘distressing’, while charities which had advocated a similar policy to Lord Freud in the past also piled in.

Indeed, it is ever harder to distinguish the outpourings of some charities from official Labour Party propaganda.

Yet it is Mr Miliband who should be most ashamed – not least over the way he cynically kept quiet about Lord Freud’s secretly-taped remarks for two weeks, then deployed them at Prime Minister’s Questions to try to detract from Wednesday’s hugely positive jobs news.

The great pity is that, when the story broke, the Tory high command’s response was to denounce Lord Freud – rather than defend a decent man who had fallen prey to a dirty and unprincipled Labour stunt.

Truly, the behaviour of everybody involved in this offers a depressing insight into the shallow posturing that makes up so much of modern politics.





Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2797942/daily-mail-comment-cynical-stunt-backfired-labour.html#ixzz3GS6DgGGu
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook