Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 13:45 - 48469 of 81564

A bit like when, or whether, the treasury informed Wavy Dave?

========

If you publicise your opinion or "facts", you should have the courage to allow them to be challenged by all, they should be open all.

I know some little people like forming consensual cliques and have similar gang traits, but they can do that off line if the need each others "company".


Haystack - 25 Oct 2014 13:54 - 48470 of 81564

that would be difficult as people could reregister as someone else and read the posts.

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 13:56 - 48471 of 81564

fred - i'm unsure whether i am happy or sad that i cause you pain :-)

Haystack - 25 Oct 2014 14:06 - 48472 of 81564

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 14:18 - 48473 of 81564

Man,

It helps to remind me that I am still alive.

8-)

ExecLine - 25 Oct 2014 14:26 - 48474 of 81564

Is it me or does the cartoon at post 48474 look to be positioned higher at the LHS than it is at the RHS?

Hmmm?

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 14:33 - 48475 of 81564

Haze the man of straw:

Your knighthood is coming:

Haystack - 25 Oct 2014 14:34 - 48476 of 81564

It is positioned that way where I got it from. I guess it was scanned crooked.

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 15:45 - 48478 of 81564

i thought it looked very much like one of the implants purloined from jumeirah beach

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 18:12 - 48479 of 81564

Haze,

It may be just a hiccup for the next 3-4 years for Labour, but it won't benefit the Con Party!

The left are squabbling amongst themselves in Scotland, but the Cons are detested in Scotland and not much love is shown to them except London , bits of the S.E. and some shires.

doodlebug4 - 25 Oct 2014 18:23 - 48480 of 81564

Fred, the Conservatives have been history in Scotland for years now. Do you actually know how many seats they have left to lose in Scotland at the GE? Labour could lose 41 seats in Scotland to the SNPs.

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 18:58 - 48481 of 81564

tories have one seat if i remember correctly, so just as ukip may make more of a mess of the tory vote in the rest of england, snp are just as likely to screw things for labour in scotland

as i have been saying for months, a hung parliament must be pretty much odds-on ..... what then happens could be interesting, and will certainly be bad for the stock market, so watch out

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 19:07 - 48482 of 81564

DB4.

After Cameron renegades on his "promises" and U-bend again where will those "old" Labour votes go?

Is the SNP and right wing or left centralist party?

Are their policies similar to those of "social democrats or moderates"?

Do they share political ideals similar to the CON party, or Labour and lib/dems?

(The lib.dems have left a bad taste in the mouth of some Scots, as they have done in England. Probably to a degree which is a bit unfair.)

Which party or group will the SNP vote with, and wish to have in government set in "LONDON"?

If you were them, would you vote for a party led by a Cameron?

If it is another coalition, which I think it probably will be, I wouldn't like to negotiate the deal, but I push my luck, and perhaps I might chuck it back to the electorate for another more defined result, immediately, or after a month or two.

(Fixed term parliaments rules seem easy to circumvent, except by those hoisted by their own petard i.e. the con party, who would have cut and run by now, if they had a chance to do so. (Another ruse which has come home to bite Cameron's arse. (Apologies to Manuel.)

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 19:11 - 48483 of 81564

surely not a sudden u-turn by fred all of a sudden ....
if it is another coalition, which I think it probably will be

strange that for months the silly old fart has been ranting on about how there'll be a clear labour majority

Fred1new - 25 Oct 2014 19:11 - 48484 of 81564

Manuel,

The stock market won't be any different, the present government isn't in charge, other than gerrymandering a political buccaneering for it own party political gain.

The market knows that.

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 19:13 - 48485 of 81564

it is absolutely certain that stock markets don't like uncertainty, and that is what there will be

dreamcatcher - 25 Oct 2014 19:20 - 48486 of 81564

dreamcatcher - 25 Oct 2014 19:21 - 48487 of 81564

cynic - 25 Oct 2014 19:24 - 48488 of 81564

who on earth was that aimed at?
Register now or login to post to this thread.