Crocodile
- 16 Dec 2002 03:59
Bolshi
- 11 Aug 2006 16:35
- 4851 of 11003
Speed tests. A couple of points I've found (I'm on BT broadband for my sins).
1. I can't get the adslguide site to work on my pc. I've removed Java and re-installed and Java site says I'm up to date & everything AOK but still stuck with the grey screen on adsl site.
2. When I've been having problems with slow speeds I've also used the BT wholesale site (thanks to Kayak I think it was).
http://speedtest.btcentralplus.com/cgi-bin/home.page.pl
I find it gave me accurate results but the BT helpline plonkers in India refuse to use it and they say it is inaccurate.
3. Try the Speakeasy speed test. Very pleased with it. I like dials 'n things!!
http://www.speakeasy.net/speedtest/
Kayak
- 11 Aug 2006 19:35
- 4852 of 11003
bolshi, in Control Panel/Java/Advanced window, check that 'Internet Explorer' is ticked under '<APPLET> tag support'. That makes IE use the new Java rather than MS Java, so you will notice minor differences in other web pages. Personally I prefer MS Java.
The BT wholesale speed test has known problems when trying to measure speeds higher than 3 or 4Mb/s I think. Also it only measures performance at the exchange and not the performance of your ISP, even if the ISP is BT retail. That is why it may look more consistent. It is only measuring part of the connection.
You should however use a speed test based in the UK as otherwise you are measuring transatlantic fibre congestion as well as your own line.
Bolshi
- 12 Aug 2006 11:44
- 4853 of 11003
Kayak. Thanks again for help. The IE box wasn't ticked. Now works fine when speed testing via IE (still doesn't work via BT/Yahoo browser but not important). So how come the BT 'experts' didn't know about it?
My usual payment of a few grubby 5 notes is now being sent to you via the internet ether. It should land on your C drive soon. Thanks again.
Speakeasy test - yeh I know it's via Yankland but those dials are kinda cool aren't they?
ThePublisher
- 12 Aug 2006 12:25
- 4854 of 11003
Did someone around here say they were using Opera as a browser?
If so I'll fire a question.
TP
ThePublisher
- 13 Aug 2006 10:08
- 4856 of 11003
Ah, good, it's you, MM.
I may need to progress this tomorrow as it is my office PC, where I upgraded to the version 9 something where the problem has arisen.
In this version 8.52 I still have the top line reading File, Edit, View etc. That no longer appears on the office upgrade, which makes printing and finding the bookmarks much more hit and miss.
Also in this version a right click produces a box of about 13 options. On the upgraded version that box contains some plus signs and other signs, but very little text.
With no top list of drop downs I don't even get access to the Help.
Any clues? My first thought was a Java conflict, but I'm guessing.
I am not going to be able to try anything you suggest today, so foregive me for not following this up until tomorrow.
Thanks in anticipation.
TP
ThePublisher
- 13 Aug 2006 18:13
- 4859 of 11003
Thanks MM.
Lots to try when I get into the office.
Hope I can report positive progress.
TP
Haystack
- 13 Aug 2006 22:21
- 4860 of 11003
I have upgraded Opera to version 9 and have none of the problems above. If you want access to the top menu try 'Alt'.
ThePublisher
- 14 Aug 2006 08:34
- 4861 of 11003
MM and Haystack,
My CTRL F12 looks like this
My Shift F 12 looks like this
Any clues?
TP
ThePublisher
- 14 Aug 2006 09:46
- 4863 of 11003
OK, MM,
I'll download a new installation file.
Could be the file itself is faulty.
What is the bore is finding where it dumped the last bookmarks. Not in Opera from what I remember last time.
TP
ThePublisher
- 14 Aug 2006 09:56
- 4864 of 11003
MM,
That solved it. In my defence I have to say I did a re-install a while ago. But this time I used a fresh download file.
Anyway it looks fine - and it kept the bookmarks.
Now to get my Updata NASDAQ feed tidied up.....But what else are Mondays for?
TP
ThePublisher
- 14 Aug 2006 17:11
- 4866 of 11003
The Updata problem is about six NASDAQ .eod files that have bad sectors. I have renamed the folder and started again with a new download of files. These duff files refused to delete.
Chkdsk says the old files have problems. I am leaving the /f til our techie comes in as the system now works at its normal speed and if it ain't broke........ let someone else break it (!).
TP
Haystack
- 14 Aug 2006 17:26
- 4867 of 11003
If you cannot delete them then you might be able to rename them.
ThePublisher
- 15 Aug 2006 08:19
- 4868 of 11003
H.
Re-naming the folder has quarantined them for the mo. I guess I should move it from within the Updata folder in case I need to do a re-install.
What is the Win2000 equiv of chkdsk? I thought I ought to run it on the whole disk. Chkdsk I ran from the cmd box on that little folder I'd called BAD.
However, whatever I do I'll back up the whole disk in case it is developing bad sectors.
TP
DocProc
- 15 Aug 2006 10:11
- 4869 of 11003