Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 14:19 - 4862 of 8631

Here's what tabby forgot to copy and paste yesterday ... BM dodging questions again.


B J Muncaster - 4 Dec'08 - 14:13 - 2158 of 2204
Dil,

You are missing an important point. You are not a shareholder in this Company, therefore I am under no obligation whatsoever to discuss anything with you, even though I have done so from time to time.

Buy some shares, let's say 100k minimum, and prove you've done so and then we'll be on the same side.

If you have any doubt about my ability to deliver on a promise, ask former employees about the visit made to our offices in March by a former owner of the property. I'm sure mots knows the story!



Dil - 4 Dec'08 - 14:22 - 2159 of 2204 edit

BM , someone posted your track record of floating companies which then became worthless (like this one).

My question is whether there are one or two that have gone on to be a success.

What has me being a shareholder in these got to do with that ?

Also when I first looked at these a few years ago you dumped just enough to get below the 3% reporting level ... you still got the rest ?

Things like that make me suspicious BM just my nature I'm afraid and in your shoes with your history I would be looking after my own interests and not worrying too much about some of the silly beggars on here hence thats what I believe you are doing.

These are my opinions and mine alone but there is no way I would be voting you back on the board to look after my interests if I were a shareholder.

Regards

Treblewide - 05 Dec 2008 14:19 - 4863 of 8631

lol

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 14:29 - 4864 of 8631

B J Muncaster - 4 Dec'08 - 14:36 - 2161 of 2211

Dil,

Great. We've established you are not a shareholder and therefore I have no obligation towards you. I also note that you consider this Company to be worthless.

Of course my interests are most important to me. I have never said otherwise. Do you operate on a different investment basis? I have stated that my interests are aligned with all the silly beggars as you would have them called, and my position about that has not changed.

Dil - 4 Dec'08 - 14:43 - 2162 of 2211 edit


No you have no obligation to me even if I were a shareholder BM so you feel free to keep picking and choosing which questions to answer its a free world but sometimes the silence says it all

... and no your interests are not always aligned with those of the 121 club so stop trying to kid everyone.

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 14:31 - 4865 of 8631

B J Muncaster - 4 Dec'08 - 15:07 - 2169 of 2211

Dil - 4 Dec'08 - 15:00 - 2166 of 2168

Just as I thought, you know nothing. No reason to engage with you any more.


Dil - 4 Dec'08 - 15:09 - 2171 of 2211 edit

Lol ... your silence is saying it all BM

answer the easy ones dodge the tough ones.



Bet there's a few more now who wouldn't want you representing their interests on the board.

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 14:31 - 4866 of 8631

B J Muncaster - 4 Dec'08 - 15:14 - 2172 of 2211


Dil,

I'll answer all of your so called tough ones, I've answered them all before to lots of other people. But as they have nothing to do with Meldex (and they don't) I'll do it by email. You have my address. You'll have to answer a couple of tough ones of my own that I have for you.

And do you seriously think I believe that every shareholder is on my side? So no surprises there then.



Dil - 4 Dec'08 - 15:17 - 2173 of 2211 edit


Why not answer them here ?

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 14:32 - 4867 of 8631

And I'm still waiting for an answer !

ptholden - 05 Dec 2008 14:34 - 4868 of 8631

Ask him how many shares he sold in the original company when listed on the NYSE and how much he made. Bearing in mind that most he got for nothing ;-)

Big Al - 05 Dec 2008 14:55 - 4869 of 8631

Afternoon. Been a busy chap. Glasgow and back - and survived the experience. ;-))

I see Tabatha is posting selectively again. Only part of my post and not a word of Barry's excellent and courteous reply. Shows you for what you are, Tabatha - yet again.

Mind you, it only does yourself harm. What a laughable plonker. LOL!

Big Al - 05 Dec 2008 14:57 - 4870 of 8631

Gausie - don't want old Tabby to get too better. He amuses me. It's a bit like having a dog and chucking him a bone every now and then. ;-)))))))))))))))

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:00 - 4871 of 8631

Waste of time pt , he hand picks the questions he'll answer .

tabasco - 05 Dec 2008 15:03 - 4872 of 8631

Dil .Barry did answer your questionshe stressed you have nothing to do with meldexwhich is 100% correct.if you want personal answers as I have received on occasions buy 100k minimum and prove thisyou will then get to hear of information that most of us have.basically put up or shut up!.
in every accusation that you have made against Barry you have failed to include written proofI would suggest that you get the necessary together and post..OK.I know whats coming.blahblahblahblahblahblah

There you go Bouncy >
Barry - thanks for the reply. They're such a disparate lot. ;-) (Note - not "desperate", in case you think it's a spelling mistake!)
----------------------
Please dont think he is your new best friend Bouncyyou would be kidding yourself a wee bit!

ptholden - 05 Dec 2008 15:19 - 4873 of 8631

If you buy 100k in MDX Dil, you will have about 50k more than BJM :))

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:22 - 4874 of 8631

As I said tabby , plenty read the threads and they can make their own minds up about his reluctance to answer.

As for buying even 1,000 in a company bordering on collapse .... do me a favour !

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:23 - 4875 of 8631

lol pt , real reason is he probably got 100k left and wants to offload them on me

tabasco - 05 Dec 2008 15:24 - 4876 of 8631

I repeat myselfyou have nothing to do with meldex.
Dil.e-mail Gordon Brown and ask him if he had oral sex with his wife last night.when he refuses to tell you post on BBs Gordon Brown wont answer my questionshe must be gay.come on dilyou get dafter by the day.

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:24 - 4877 of 8631

I'll ask him pt :-)

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:27 - 4878 of 8631

I will , which thread is he posting on tabby ???

Big Al - 05 Dec 2008 15:29 - 4879 of 8631

Tabby - We'll let you know when (if) it's time to buy. Even Barry can't tell us when.

One thing's for sure. Absolutely no way it was when you did it, feckwit!


Might go back and edit my spelling on that one post, though. Both are true, after all. Just been catching up with the 159 posts I missed during my trip across the way. Fabulous. How can so many eejits be so detailed about a 20m company the vast majority of the planet doesn't give a toss about? This is their whole lives for Chrissakes. And they tell me to get one? LOL!

Big Al - 05 Dec 2008 15:29 - 4880 of 8631

Tabatha - BBs ain't just for holders, dimwit.

Dil - 05 Dec 2008 15:30 - 4881 of 8631

Dil - 5 Dec'08 - 15:29 - 2213 of 2213 edit


Been thinking about your suggestion re buying 100,000 shares BM .... you trying to shift some more ?
Register now or login to post to this thread.