Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

new millennium resources (NML)     

LEEWINK - 28 Mar 2004 15:45

NML is due its interrim results now, last year it was the 28th of this month.

They are setting up a new site to explore/research/analyse and all the equipment to do this should be on site now, and drilling should start soon, all this extra news should be covered in the interims.

does anyone have any further positive views on this company ??

EWRobson - 07 May 2005 23:05 - 487 of 1909

legend: my sacred weapon was really secret but probably does need a lot of faith - and a lot of luck. Not saying except to advise a serious look at Interregnum (ITR)!

Just visit the Champion Investor thread at the top of the list.

Eric

legend290782 - 08 May 2005 17:00 - 488 of 1909

Thanks mate, im entered... am off to dominican for 2 wks but will try to monitor the stocks while away.

Good luck

mjr1234 - 10 May 2005 16:51 - 489 of 1909

Where's the big sell?

EWRobson - 10 May 2005 22:32 - 490 of 1909

What big sell?

Andy - 10 May 2005 23:25 - 491 of 1909

NJR,

only the offer was lowered today, the bid held steady, trying to tempt buyers in by the looks of it.

Only 1 sell and 3 buys IMHO, no large sell.

mjr1234 - 11 May 2005 09:58 - 492 of 1909

Put it this way,

On Monday you could buy up to 250k at 4.38p,

Now you can buy 500k for 4.0p online.

This suggested to me that a big sell had gone through, so I was a bit surprised when none turned up.

Nice to see a few buyers this morning though, at this bargain price.

Andy - 11 May 2005 12:51 - 493 of 1909

mjr,

Ok fair enough, in fact there MAY be a large protected sell being worked by the MM's, and IF there is, we won't know until it's complete.

I take your point regarding the lower offer, it does look at though they are trying to tempt in some buyers IMO.

Dynamite - 11 May 2005 14:09 - 494 of 1909

Virtually all the trades today are buys not sells. You can currently buy at 3.98p so fill up whilst you can...these are ridiculously cheap DYOr

Andy - 11 May 2005 14:17 - 495 of 1909

Dynamite,

The fact that you can buy at 3.98p when the offer is at 4.25 does not fill me with confidence!

I suspect they have a few to sell, hence the discount to market price.

ASMITH2 - 11 May 2005 14:41 - 496 of 1909

Dont think theres a big sell there would have been more aggressive moves by the mms to fill the order asap.Its more than likely a placing on the cards at 4p thats waiting in the wings.Probably get news about the first diamonds along with yet another placing which means weeks more of depression as the placed shares come to the market to kill any rally in its tracks.

Andy - 11 May 2005 14:55 - 497 of 1909

asmith2,

You coule be right, I think a placing is a distict possibility, but not at 4p, that's too optimistic IMHO.

My guess, at these levels would be 3 - 3.5p, as it will surely have to be at a discount to market price?

They MAY, of course, simply borrow the money, rather than dilute further, and I believe they have a facility arranged should they require to do so.


This is starting to look interesting IMO.

mjr1234 - 11 May 2005 15:15 - 498 of 1909

ASMITH2,

If a company places shares with an institution, it doesn't necessarily follow that these shares are then quickly dumped on the market! In fact, the only circumstances where this happens in my experience, is when the placing is with penny share bucket shops eg CE/HB, when those parties sell their shares to their customers at a profit, who then subsequently sell out. I would be very suprised and dissappointed if a placing was done with the penny share bucket shops.

Any other institution is not going to invest in a placing only to dump their lot on the market the next week. For one thing, they will probably have a lock-in agreement and/or warrants.

All in all, a placing will be seen as a good thing by the market in this case, as it will be expected that the company will use the cash to quickly bring in revenue from the mining, rather than it being frittered away just to keep them afloat like in some other companies.

But as Andy says, they also have banking facilities available to them, and since the company is going to be bringing in significant revenue streams in the near future, a short-term option such as a loan would be much better than an equity placing.

Andy - 11 May 2005 23:09 - 499 of 1909

mjr,

Nicely worded.

I too would be disappointed if they placed with CE/HB, as they deal with placings from distressed companies as a large discount to the current market price.

CE / HB could be the last port of call for a company that needs cash to survive, and has explored all other routes without success.

I do not see NML as such a company, and feel sure they will be able to raise funds without taking the bucket shop broker route.

EWRobson - 11 May 2005 23:32 - 500 of 1909

A cursory look at the interims shows low cash; although the istuation has been cleaned up since December, under 1m of additional funds were obtained. It seems likely that the April visit to London was to organise cash. Moreover, NML have said that they want to develop a second field in parallel. The problem is that the cap is so low at around 4m. Given that this is expected to be dwarfed by the value of the first year's minings it seems preferable for funds to be a loan, possibly convertible in the future when no one will worry given the anticipated capital growth. The alternative, and this does seem quite likely, is to await the completion of this initial phase in June when we were advised that projections should be available. The sp jumps and a placing is made at a higher value. If it is to be a placing then this strategy seems the obvious one. We could well be talking about annual earnings at greater than the current cap. for goodness sake!

Eric

Andy - 12 May 2005 09:34 - 501 of 1909

Eric,

Yes I too think they could well be aiming to do a placing after the initial production run, and a ramp up in shareprice, but that requires them to deliver first, and that suits me.

On the otherhand, those buying in when they announce news run a very good chance of instant dilution, and a drop in price as the placing will almost certainly be a discounted one IMO.

Hard one to call at the moment.

EWRobson - 12 May 2005 09:49 - 502 of 1909

Worth adding that there is very little in the price re the initial production output. We already have sound geological figures from qualified people. With more research in th epipeline it is really a one-way bet at the moment. Sooner or later there is going to be a real run on this share (IMnshO!).

Eric

ASMITH2 - 12 May 2005 15:01 - 503 of 1909

Theres something just not right about this company at all.The fact that you can buy below the mid price shows how weak this is and is very likely to fall from here 3.5 / 4.0 will be the next quote or 3.75 / 4.0p when the market makerrealises hes run out of mug punters at 3.975!
There has been huge selling into every single rally now I wonder why that is...!Just doesnt sound right to me..

mjr1234 - 12 May 2005 15:38 - 504 of 1909

Basically, the selling into the rallies is shall we say 'low' or 'non'-risk takers selling to risk-takers ie you and me.
The low or non-risk takers for whatever reason want to remove the risk on their shares, which they may have received from convertable loans or fees for work done etc, and they have no interest in investing for future growth. Their sole policy is to convert their shares into cash as soon as possible.

That's my take on the selling, anyway.

One day, the seller will have sold all their shares, and the overhang will be gone. That situation is often when you see the biggest and fastest gains.

Andy - 13 May 2005 00:40 - 505 of 1909

mjr1234,

Are you saying that the placees that bought at lower prices are the sellers?

And don't you think they are risk takers, if they bought when the company was not as developed as it is now?

I believe the Badenhorsts have only sold 1 million shares, and so not too many of the sales are from people that have been paid in kind, so to speak, IMHO.

stockdog - 13 May 2005 07:26 - 506 of 1909

Andy

They are risk takers, but of the kind that are happy to take a turn and move on, unless there is immediate prospect of better things. If not take the margin and get rid of the risk. IMHO

This would be subject to any lock-in agreements which are less likely with additional fund-raisin than with an IPO etc.

sd
Register now or login to post to this thread.