Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MELDEX. Double your money- quicktime. (MDX)     

kitosdad - 12 Dec 2007 16:20

The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=MDX&Si

tabasco - 08 Dec 2008 13:49 - 4939 of 8631

Dilsometimes you even surprise meI cant be bothered.

Dil - 08 Dec 2008 13:57 - 4940 of 8631

So he's got Tampa and Dexo right in the last two weeks and reckons the KK's and BM will be carving the rest up.

What the shareholders going to get besides shafted ?

Treblewide - 08 Dec 2008 13:59 - 4941 of 8631

jesus so they have punted half of the turnover and have no money to spend on new products...final nail and coffin springs to mind

Big Al - 08 Dec 2008 15:23 - 4942 of 8631

Getting on for the best volume in about a month.

Interesting to drop in over the road. Everyone else's fault, but their own as usual. Idiots.

hangon - 08 Dec 2008 15:26 - 4943 of 8631

Treblewide you are probab.ly right, this Co has been a disaster from start to (finish?) with many execs getting far too much whilst making things even worse. I wonder what all those(bb investoprs) that supported BPRG/MDX-Management will say by way of apology - that they were so very wrong.
This was a rotten business right from the start.
Er, IMHO -

jeffmack - 08 Dec 2008 15:36 - 4944 of 8631

Just seen this from yesterday


SCRUTABLE - 7 Dec'08 - 00:42 - 2244 of 2264

Wheelbrace1 - 6 Dec'08 - 23:29 - 2243 of 2243
nomotto - 6 Dec'08 - 23:12 - 140354 of 140354

isn't it incredible what happens when someone says something sensible. they all pounce. now what does that tell you all?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not only is the sensible stuff in short supply, but the hyaenas are in full cry with their disinformation strategy.

Nowhere is there a satisfactory explanation for the increasingly rapid disappearance of cash. RT has been gone some three months - time enough for investors to sense, in the eyrie silence, that things have since got much worse.

Since RT was ousted by a boardroom coup, the share price has lost a further 75% or so. How can he possibly have been the cause of it? The boil allegedly lanced festers on. The only possible conclusion is that those actually causing the problem have been seen with hindsight to have skilfully found a scapegoat. They remain inside and alongside the company, and continue to do their worst.

The previous fall in H1 (70%) was in line with the collapse of the whole market, but the sharper, steeper second leg can be mainly ascribed to MDX events 'after Trevillion'. Surely the penny now drops?.

How can anyone now honestly claim that RT was solely responsible for the original collapse ? What were the other directors doing? As demonstrated at the AGM, RT had no hypnotic powers, perverse charisma, or powerful patronage to leverage his six fellow directors.

He does not exactly stand out as a man whose personality makes grown men quake.

The share price fall in H1 after BJM's deceitfully empty bid approach was seized on by opportunists. The external situation allowed them to marginalise and get an ineffectual CFO suddenly fired without justification, when he began to ask too many questions.

Though RT was blamed for the unsubstantiated forecasts for Steve Martin's Development department to whom such things were delegated, he had actually been required by the board to concentrate (with Hiram Patel and Peter Ibbetson) and via Houlihan Leakey, on the stalking horse bid approach and the other approaches which were stimulated by it.. RT was actually sidelined during the time that the cash troubles began to fester, and the forecasts to fall short. None of the three members of that bid committee are still with the company. Does that not with hindsight appear significant?. .

Then BJM's hyaena mob were easily able to mobilise shareholder pain to demonise RT and get rid of him. This cleared the way to take predatory advantage - for them and the two Ks to position themselves for a share of the spoils. A disproportionate cash flow must have been organised or Melbrosin, and the IP is now potentially available on the cheap for BJM and his pack.

Is this not a good explanatioin for the access to the two Ks that BJM seems to have engineered, and on which investors have begun to rely for information in the striking absence of it from the company itself?


Dil - 08 Dec 2008 15:41 - 4945 of 8631

Yep that post just about sums up about 90% of them in the zoo.

You going to report him for that one too tabby ?

ptholden - 08 Dec 2008 15:44 - 4946 of 8631

Personally, I am in no doubt that BJM is using the ADVFN BB to meet his own ends. I am also staggered that so many posters have hung their hat on the failed founder of BPRG. Of course in financial terms he didn't fail at all. How on earth were he and his cronies allowed to get away with his own company - The Jade Partnership - providing financial advice to errr his own company - BPRG? Jade (Muncaster et al) were very well recompensed for talking to themselves!

Gausie - 08 Dec 2008 15:58 - 4947 of 8631

ouch - 6.6p touched. Lowest trade today is 6.21p. 5p is soooooo close. And so is bust.

tabasco - 08 Dec 2008 16:09 - 4948 of 8631

What a stupid post that was Gausienow you know why you are an affiliated member of the groovy gang.and challenging for gold!

Andy - 08 Dec 2008 16:16 - 4949 of 8631

tabby,

That announcement looks absolutely dire IMO.

Instead fo reporting 2ronnies and scrutable, maybe you should be paying heed to what they are saying, as they seem to be the only people accurately and timely reporting the news from MDX!

And the FSa will simply bin your email, they won't do a thing, they are innundated with shareholder complaints from BB postings.

Dil - 08 Dec 2008 16:34 - 4950 of 8631

I'm reporting BM for trying to flog me 100k of this crap last week when he probably knew about todays news.

tabasco - 08 Dec 2008 16:38 - 4951 of 8631

OK Andy.it looks like you know more about my movements than I know myselfif that is what you believe I have nothing else to addit might be worth reading what Barrys take is tonightjust one last thought the company are no longer in debt.would you say that is a better position at this stageFortis being weighed off!
.
The company said it did not intend to sell its remaining assets, including other products, new product development programmes and drug delivery technologies as they were considered core growth drivers for the future.

Big Al - 08 Dec 2008 16:39 - 4952 of 8631

I'm not going to report anyone, but I'd certify Tabatha for being a complete and utter Richard Cranium. ;-)))

Big Al - 08 Dec 2008 16:40 - 4953 of 8631

Tabatha

I'm sure they didn't intend selling ANY assets until a short time ago. ;-))))

ptholden - 08 Dec 2008 16:42 - 4954 of 8631

'This disposal process and its accelerated timing is to repay the Company's bankers. The funds received will be used to repay the majority of an outstanding facility of 7m which was originally negotiated in October 2007.'

Tabasco clearly is unable to read, note the wrod majority, so not all, so in other words the company are NOT debt free. Jeez how difficult can it be?

tabasco - 08 Dec 2008 16:49 - 4955 of 8631

Closed @ 7.75pthat got hit by a juggernaut on the news.lol

Big Al - 08 Dec 2008 16:50 - 4956 of 8631

pth

It's very difficult if you are "never wrong" and also wear rose-tinted spectacles. If you are particularly dim, then it's also very difficult. If you are a complete nobody, then it's damn near impossible.

All IMHO, naturally.

ROFLMAO!

Dil - 08 Dec 2008 16:50 - 4957 of 8631

Tabby ... why would anyone give a sh*t what BM's take is on it ?

Dil - 08 Dec 2008 16:52 - 4958 of 8631

And it says it all when a 5% fall in the share price is something to celebrate !
Register now or login to post to this thread.