Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Max your local Tory peeps are bigger liars than central office.

MaxK
Sounds like good news. The plans are working well.

If the plans are working so well, why is the SS bill still going up?

LOL, yep go on Hays explain that one away.

One explanation low skilled part time jobs and subsidised by the goverment through Tax Credits and Housing Benefit.

Watch the new John Lewis Christmas TV ad' which features 'Monty' the penguin and has cost £1m to make. Once again, you'll struggle to hold back a tear as it gives a subtle tug at your emotions with a very clever reminder as to what the Christmas time of year is really about.

I chose this link because it also allows you to look at previous JL Christmas adverts if you want to do that.

Once again, John Lewis gets 10/10:

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz-tv/hot-tv/408918/John-Lewis-Christmas-advert-2014-watch-video-Monty-The-Penguin

At least religion is being kept out of Christmas.

Haystack, don' t you believe in Santa Claus?!

The feast was Saturnalia based on the Roman god Saturn's. The 25 Dec is the winter solstice in the Julian calendar. It was a time of gift giving. The Christians set their own feast days to coincide with the Roman ones to suppress them. There is no real association with any religious event in history such as the birth of JC.

even the mail is saying the immigration report is a load of bollocks .
have they found the millions of illegals the man who did the report read about the stupid prat

Re: The Luxembourg VAT scam.

For a change, I have to say how good it is to read something like this concerning the EU and its law changing.......

LUXEMBOURG will be the big loser – to the tune of between €600m to €1.1billion – when new EU VAT rules on digital services sales come into effect in 2015.

Luxembourg VAT revenue
The 2014 budget for Luxembourg was a tough one as the country comes to grips with losing between €600m and €1.1billion in VAT revenues due to the new EU rules.

The winners and losers of the VAT reform note that Luxembourg’s competitive advantage will be swept away by the new rules.

The new rules are enshrined in the 2015 VAT Directive which dictates that VAT collection on digital services (e.g. software, music and image downloading as well as ebooks) will be based on where the end consumer is located. The existing rules use the location of the supplier as the basis for applying VAT.

This is the reason that companies such as Apple, Amazon and Microsoft located their European HQs in Luxembourg. Luxembourg’s VAT rate is very low, its standard rate is 15% but it offered a super reduced rate of just 3% on ebooks, as well as the country’s hotel and catering industries. However, as of from January 1, 2015, that competitive advantage will be erased with the introduction of the new EU VAT rules.

Necessary steps by Luxembourg
Luxembourg has already taken the necessary steps to address their €545m budget deficit by increasing its key VAT rates by two percent, their standard rate from 2015 onwards will be 17%. However, the government of the Grand Duchy has not raised their super reduced rate of 3% stating that it wants to protect jobs in its hotel and catering industries.

Luxembourg has estimated that it will lose 70 percent of its VAT revenue from the rule changes, ranging between €660m and €1.1billion.

However, Luxembourg officials believe the country will remain attractive as an EU HQ for global companies.

“Companies like Amazon are based in Luxembourg because we are business friendly and we offer them a great gateway into the [EU] and excellent talent . . . the VAT tax regime on ebooks is not going to be a game-changer,” said one official.
On the flip side of the rule change is the benefit that countries with a large digital services consumer base will receive. The UK Chancellor for the Exchequer George Osborne outlined in his 2014 Budget speech that the UK can expect to receive £1.2billion in extra VAT receipts between 2015 and 2018, that’s £300m per year.

The rules – according to the European Commission – are a levelling of the playing field when it comes to EU VAT. Luxembourg’s competitive advantage will be wiped out and the larger EU economies will receive the VAT revenue created by their own consumers. For example, the UK will receive the VAT collected from UK sales on e-books; Germany will receive the VAT collected from music downloads in Germany, and so on. A fairer taxation system and one that returns VAT to being a consumption tax.

Run for the hills.. the europeans are coming -):

One of the problems with Luxembourg's vat rules is that companies based there such as Amazon won't give you a vat receipt. That means that businesses that use Amazon cannot claim back the vat.

panic stations.....



Balls denies claims Labour split over Miliband's leadership: Politics Live blog



http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2014/nov/06/nick-clegg-hosts-his-call-clegg-phone-in-politics-live-blog

GF,

One of the questions I would like to ask is, "how much profits are made by the companies which are outsource to by the NHS?".

What are their overall profits which are paid for by the TAX PAYER, (you know that high earning rich Working Class like Cameron and crew) for those services and cost of management and %profit?

Just a thought, especially as if the con party were to get into power again there will be further cut backs and outsourcing as efficiency measures so we can pay our way.

Sorry pay their way!

To me it seems that the Gay Rights lobby are changing from being the persecuted to the persecutors.

Strange world!

Max.

Neither Balls. nor Miliband are mad.

At the closeness of the next General Election they will sink or swim together.

Even, if the had differences of opinion on some policies, I doubt they are great and certainly I think and hope that they and the shadow cabinet would be continually reconsidering policies and giving each other and their party room for discussion.

The economic situation is a hell of a long way from being stable and it is that which really counts when you are drawing up future policies. (or should be.) The rest all though being played up in the media are side issues.

This is another media attempt to see splits where they are not or conjure them up.

I always thought, "at least for last 60 years, when I first started reading it" that it had a liberal bias and leaning, and a little surprised how much they have lent towards labour over the last 10 years.

------

Wait for the last 2-3 months of the run up to the election.

Ed's personal standing is partially due to media and tory party smearing.

He has a thick skin and think and hope he will ride his horse more carefully than Kinnock did.

But wait for the wrath when Cameron loses Rochester and the G.E.

======

What I am waiting for, is when Cameron goes to Europe they start laughing at him
openly!

Labour will get there 35% for sure Fred after ROCHESTER.

Debatable wether Camoron will be leading the tories into the GE especialy with more defections.

Is that defections or infections?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11212964/Ed-Miliband-is-abandoned-left-to-face-his-destiny-alone.html

Ed Miliband is abandoned, left to face his destiny alone

Even the New Statesman is calling time on the Ed Miliband era. Labour and the Left are turning on their leader

And then there were none. This morning Jason Cowley – editor of the house journal of the progressive Left, the New Statesman – has effectively called time on Ed Miliband’s leadership. Miliband is “trapped”, he writes. “His MPs sense it and the polls reflect it. Ukip is attracting support in the party’s old working-class northern English heartlands and winning converts in key Home Counties swing seats that Labour would once have hoped to win. In Scotland the SNP has become the natural party of government.”

According to Cowley, “Labour wins well when its leader seems most in tune with the times and can speak for and to the people about who they are and what they want to be in the near future: Attlee in 1945, Wilson in 1966, Blair in 1997.” By contrast, Miliband “does not have a compelling personal story to tell the electorate”. He “doesn’t really understand the lower middle class or material aspiration. He doesn’t understand Essex Man or Woman”. Instead, Labour is currently lead by “an old-style Hampstead socialist”, with “a deterministic, quasi-Marxist analysis of our present ills”, who has created “a gulf between the radicalism of his rhetoric and the low-toned incrementalism of his policies”.

This is not the Daily Mail we’re talking about, but the New Statesman. On the front cover is an artist’s impression of Miliband wearing a fez. Six months from the election, the Left is now openly mocking its own leader.

Yesterday evening, as the embargoed copies of Cowley’s article began to circulate, it was announced that Miliband had conducted a mini-reshuffle. Shadow transport secretary Mary Creagh had replaced Jim Murphy at DfID, and had in return been replaced by Michael Dugher, who had previously held the post of shadow minister for kicking lumps out of the Coalition.

But there were two other significant appointments. Lucy Powell, Ed Miliband’s former chief of staff, has been formally brought into the shadow cabinet, as has key Miliband supporter and union go-between Jon Trickett. Powell is a rising star, Trickett an old Westminster greybeard. Yet both were already fully paid-up members of the Miliband inner circle. And their elevation represents a final, symbolic circling of the wagons.