The ratio of haves to have nots is increasing in "wealth and income", but the number of votes for the moderates and left is not!
The majority of voters are although apathetic at the moment by the time of the G.E. will be more aware of the damages done by Osborne and IDS and Cameron in different ares.
1) NHS Failings.
2) Welfare cuts of extended families.
3) Repayments of University fees
4) Lack of housing.
5) FOOD BANKS queues.
6) Scorn of other EU members.
7) Soured EU and International relationships. Who see Cameron for what he is and don't like him.
8) Probably downward moving GDP, partially due to previous.
9) Failure in Education
10) Failure on their cock eyed boasts on immigration
11) Failure on recruitment for cut back military forces.
12) Corruption charge and Loss of evidence from Paedophile investigations
14) Power shortages?
15) Exposure of TAX DODGING
ETc, ect
What are the tory odds?
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/nov/15/coalition-helped-rich-hitting-poor-george-osborne
Revealed: how coalition has helped rich by hitting poor
Study shows gains for wealthier half of population, delivering a blow to George Osborne’s claims on fairness
======
■ Sweeping changes to benefits and income tax have had the effect of switching income from the poorer half of households to most of the richer half, with the poorest 5% in the country in terms of income losing nearly 3% of what they would have earned if Britain’s tax and welfare system of May 2010 had been retained.
■ With the exception of the top 5%, who lost 1% of their potential income, it is the better-off half of the country that has gained financially from the changes, with an increase of between 1.2% and 2% in their disposable income.
■ The top 1% in terms of income have also been small net gainers from the changes brought in by David Cameron’s government since May 2010, which include a cut in the top rate of income tax.
■ Two-earner households, and those with elderly family members, were the most favourably treated, as a result of direct tax changes and state pensions respectively.
■ Lone-parent families did worst, losing much more through cuts in benefits and tax credits and higher council tax than they gained through higher income tax allowances. Families with children in general, and large families in particular, also did much worse than the average.
■ A quarter of the lowest paid 10% have shouldered a particularly heavy burden, losing more than 5% of what would have been their income without the coalition’s reforms.