Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

goldfinger - 18 Nov 2014 10:06 - 50531 of 81564

Yep Deceptive Dave, its spreading here like Bird flu aswel.

Haystack - 18 Nov 2014 10:09 - 50532 of 81564

This is a good fan site.

http://awkwardedmilibandmoments.tumblr.com/

cynic - 18 Nov 2014 10:12 - 50533 of 81564

didn't watch, but if MK's comment is as shown above, then of course she's absolutely right

my parents (both now dead as it happens), bought their house with 2 acres of land just after the war for £7.000 ...... purely by happenstance and location, it was of course worth a massive amount more when my mother (last survivor) died about 3 years ago, not least because the extra land (a large orchard) now had outline planning for 4 houses

by all means charge extra stamp duty on purchase - it's already been applied, although in a most unfair manner - but to charge super-tax purely because "the market says" a certain property is worth this arbitary £2m cannot be just, the more so if it isn't a staggered tax

=========

i wouldn 't be surprised if similar also applies in Aberdeen where housing is apparently staggeringly expensive

Haystack - 18 Nov 2014 10:15 - 50534 of 81564

It was nice to see Miliband making a fool of himself again last night. Every panel member attacked him last night. The audience joined in as well. He is a walking car crash. When the public were asked to choose actors who should play politicians the other day, the was Rowan Atkinson. Cameron got Hugh Grant, Clegg got Colin Firth.

Stan - 18 Nov 2014 10:16 - 50535 of 81564

Alf, The word we use is "Fair" in this country, you should know that by now.. so just pay up or right.

goldfinger - 18 Nov 2014 10:21 - 50536 of 81564

Deceptive Dave makes a fool of himself everytime he speaks. He lies so much he forgets what he as lied about and is always getting letters from the parliamentry watchdog who look over conduct of the house of commons MPs.

People have lost count now how many times hes now had to apologise.

MaxK - 18 Nov 2014 10:28 - 50537 of 81564

I don't buy this "poor old granny" stuff.

If you are sitting on an asset worth £2mill+, you are not a poor old granny at all, in fact you are very rich, top % of the population.

Why shouldn't they pay more?

TANKER - 18 Nov 2014 10:35 - 50538 of 81564

palestian scum killing people well they pray about ways up the palestians as scum wipe them from the good earth wipe them out .

TANKER - 18 Nov 2014 10:36 - 50539 of 81564

hays you non posting of these act says you are lost for words of the scum

goldfinger - 18 Nov 2014 10:37 - 50540 of 81564

Cameron’s global crash warning: He’ll do nothing about it 18/11/2014

141117UK-public-debt.gif?zoom=1.5&resize
“Our long-term economic plan is working!” says Cameron – and the debt keeps rising.

It’s more accurate to say he’ll do nothing right.

David Cameron is warning that another global financial crash is on the way. It’s an accurate warning – others have been forecasting it for a while but, seeing him saying it, didn’t you ask yourself who he’ll be blaming this time?

It can’t be Labour’s fault – Labour has been out of office for a few years and besides, Labour policies were sorting out the fallout left by the last right-wing-precipitated global financial catastrophe until the Tories lied their way into office and then twiddled their thumbs for four long years.

He reckons emerging markets that sustained the recovery (what recovery?) are slowing down but the British economy is growing and needs to be insulated from any crash. He says employment is up massively and new businesses are proliferating – but if you scratch the surface of that claim you’ll see that the number of hours worked is no higher than in 2010 and new businesses are being ‘run’ by people who are claiming tax credits as self-employed because then they won’t be hassled by the DWP while claiming JSA. There are new businesses, of course, but not nearly as many as Cameron wants you to believe.

Cameron’s article in The Guardian, if read properly, is comedy. It certainly isn’t to be taken seriously.

“When we faced similar problems in recent years, too many politicians offered easy answers, thinking we could spend, borrow and tax our way to prosperity,” he writes. Which politicians? Gordon Brown is the only Chancellor in recent history to manage a surplus, rather than a deficit; his policies brought the UK unexpected prosperity (which, unfortunately, led to the EU surcharge that has so badly embarrassed George Osborne); and his successor Alistair Darling introduced policies that knocked £38 billion off the deficit created by the right-wing bankers’ gambling binge.

Cameron must be referring to Conservative politicians in his own government.

es, look, here’s a bit where he writes: “It is more important than ever that we send a clear message to the world that Britain is not going to waver on dealing with its debts.” He could have cut that sentence down to read: “Britain is not dealing with its debts.” The national debt has more than doubled since the Conservatives started running the economy – from around £800 billion to £1.8 trillion by 2015, meaning George Osborne’s pitiful attempts to tackle the national deficit by cutting public services and selling off the country’s assets have achieved less than nothing.

“This stability is vital in attracting the business and international investment that delivers growth and jobs, and which keeps long-term interest rates low.” You couldn’t make this up. Interest rates are low because lenders know the UK has its own sovereign currency and will always be able to pay its debts, one way or another, even if it means printing more money (quantitative easing, anyone?) – remember when the UK’s triple-A credit rating went downriver despite all Osborne’s efforts to keep it? He claimed this meant the cost of borrowing would leap, but the effect has gone unnoticed.

There’s a lot more waffle and you can read it on The Guardian‘s site. It’s amazing a paper of its standing bothered to publish it.

For a more informed opinion, let’s go to Richard Murphy of Tax Research UK, pausing for a moment to wish him well in his recovery from recent surgery.

“His focus is instead on highlighting problems in Europe and on signing TTIP – the trade treaty that will require the privatisation of the NHS whatever he says now,” writes Mr Murphy – possibly from the recovery ward.

“This is a man who can see a crisis coming and who must know that his austerity programme can only make it worse (anyone but a fool can see taking money out of a failing economy, as he plans to do, is bound to make it worse) but who is resolutely refusing to recognise the issues that will cause this next wave of economic collapse.

“The wrong people have the money… The people who spend least of their incomes have had the biggest pay rises and are the only ones to enjoy effective tax decreases over the last few years. These people are the highest income earners in the UK.

“At the same time, cutting benefits for the poorest and increasing VAT (which together with deliberately enforced wage cuts have reduced the net disposable income of most people) and cutting taxes for the wealthiest, this has been the inevitable outcome. And we know this outcome has not happened by chance: this is deliberate.

“When there’s a shortage of spending in the economy to let the wealthiest get wealthier, [it] simply means that the imbalances within it get worse. And it’s imbalances that cause crises.

“Corporation tax cuts and reforms to our corporation tax system that means that multinational corporations based in the UK can, since 2010, find it much easier to make effective use of tax havens to cut their UK tax bills have also made the problem worse. I reckon these cuts are costing at least £10 billion a year. What these cuts do is transfer money that would have belonged to the state to companies in the hope that they will be encouraged to invest it as a result. But they aren’t doing any such thing.

“Companies are taking the tax cuts and banking them. They aren’t even giving them back to their owners. They’re just hoarding it. Like the wealthy (perhaps, unsurprisingly) large companies are simply sitting on their cash.

“The tax gap is another indication of this. What really belongs to the government is in the hands of crooks and cheats, with massive economic consequences.

“What can be done? I’ve always pointed out that there are only four drivers of the economy: consumer spending, investment, net foreign flows and government spending.

“Investment is not happening; business will not do it: that’s why they havecash.
“Net foreign flows are broadly neutral: the trade deficit is dire but hot money still comes to the UK, although we cannot rely on that.
“Consumer spending is poor and may get worse: most people do not have the money.
“And that leaves the government to put matters right. It has to generate new economic activity.”
Mr Murphy proposes more quantitative easing – printing money and then investing it in a new, sustainable infrastructive (not the kind that Cameron is pushing); rebalancing tax by increasing taxes for those who can pay; and closing the tax gap.

You won’t see any of those under a Conservative government!

Get ready to batten down the hatches for another round of financial catastrophe, and this time, be prepared to put the blame where it really belongs – on Conservative politicians whose supposed reputation for financial competence is a myth and who should never have been allowed near the national economy.

And remember where the blame lies when you vote next May.

cynic - 18 Nov 2014 10:38 - 50541 of 81564

if it's a staggered tax, then i don't have quite as much objection, though the politics of jealousy is always exceedingly ugly

stan - questionable whether or not my own house exceeds the threshold ..... my parents' house is long sold now and the proper taxes paid on it of course

MaxK - 18 Nov 2014 11:03 - 50542 of 81564

Of course, a sliding scale.

The more it's worth, the more you pay.

2517GEORGE - 18 Nov 2014 11:07 - 50543 of 81564

At what house valuation (on the downside) do you think the Mansion Tax will stop. You have to be naive to think the ordinary houseowner will escape the clutches of a needy government.
2517

Stan - 18 Nov 2014 11:07 - 50544 of 81564

Well Alf, this is very good news for you and me as such payments from you can now be quite justifiably recycled to the likes of me through my Sipp which I am in the process of in acting.. once again I thank you -):

TANKER - 18 Nov 2014 11:09 - 50545 of 81564

the best way forward get out of the eu get all migrants out get all illegals out
will not need any more new homes doctors will be better service so will hospitals and schools . and losing 3 million jobs will mean nothing a better country to live in not full of low life scum from all over the world .

and if you do not like that
then a world war to finally wipe out the terrorist .

TANKER - 18 Nov 2014 11:13 - 50546 of 81564

gf if we stay in the eu and all these migrants come to the uk in their millions like now we have over 8 million . who is going to look after them and pay their pensions
in old age . we are struggling now to manage . and getting worse ever day

answer this question please

aldwickk - 18 Nov 2014 11:32 - 50547 of 81564

A 2 million pound house in London is not a Mansion , more like a average size terrace house in some parts of London., large families need a big house and the working/none working class and immigrants have big families , so they would be hit with the tax or have it paid for by the tax payer, even the poll tax might be fairer

Chris Carson - 18 Nov 2014 11:37 - 50548 of 81564

By Holly Watt, Whitehall Editor12:01AM GMT 18 Nov 2014
Labour has been accused of “catastrophically misunderstanding” the immigration system, after the Home Office attacked a flagship strategy before it was even announced by Yvette Cooper.
The Shadow Home Secretary was due to unveil the recruitment of 1,000 extra border guards, funded by a new electronic visa waiver, but Home Office sources said that her plans would only fund 59 new staff.
Under Miss Cooper’s plans, nationals in countries enjoying a "visa waiver" system of fast-track permission to enter the UK would be hit with a charge of around £10 per visit.
The Labour party said would more than cover the £45 million cost of the additional staff.
However, Home Office sources immediately said that the charges would not cover the 1,000 new staff, pointing out that only a few countries were affected by the visa waiver system. Only visitors from Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates would be affected, with Kuwait due to join the scheme next year.
Given that less than a quarter of a million visitors from these countries would pay the charge a year, Home Office sources said that less than £2.5million would be raised by the new system.
“It is catastrophically wrong,” said a Home Office source. “They have completely misunderstood the whole immigration system.”
The source added that If Labour planned to extend the electronic visa waiver scheme to visitors from all countries that do not at present require a visa – such as the United States, Canada, New Zealand and Australia – they would be creating a complicated new system that would cost more to operate than it would recover in fees of £10 per person.
In her speech on immigration, Miss Cooper is due to accuse the Conservatives and the UK Independence Party of engaging in an “arms race of rhetoric”, making the debate polarised and unhealthy.
Her speech comes after the party leader Ed Miliband said last week that Labour would be "talking more about immigration as a party", but “always on the basis of Labour values, not UKIP values".
“Enforcement has got worse in the last five years. Under Theresa May basic checks are just not being done, and that is undermining confidence in the whole system,” Miss Cooper will say, highlighting concerns about border guards. “The number of people stopped and turned away at the border has halved.”
Miss Cooper will also highlight the dangers of human trafficking, as well as warning that the amount of drugs being seized at the borders has fallen.
“At Calais there are now serious and growing problems - where we have seen not just abuse but tragedy,” she will warn.
“Awful cases of young men camping by the roadside then leaping onto the wheel arches of passing lorries, only to be crushed and killed.”
The success of Ukip, who are likely to win a by-election in Rochester and Strood this week according to polling, has driven the main political to set out their views on immigration.
David Cameron is trying to control the number of immigrants from the European Union, but is facing fierce opposition from other European leaders.
The former Prime Minister Sir John Major has warned that public concern about EU immigration could push Britain out of Europe altogether.

Fred1new - 18 Nov 2014 11:42 - 50549 of 81564

Manuel.,

Greed and jealousy have their links.

Haystack - 18 Nov 2014 11:44 - 50550 of 81564

Many old people are asset rich and cash poor. Where I live, every road is full of houses over £2m. They are mainly owned by pensioners who are living on small pensions. They couldn't pay a mansion tax. They bought the houses when they were quite cheap or they were left to them by parents. The tax is only going to apply to properties in London and the South East to any great extent. Even Milibands party don't like the tax.
Register now or login to post to this thread.