goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
goldfinger
- 21 Nov 2014 09:32
- 50885 of 81564
That Croc is trained to eat Tories.
Watch out Hays.
Shortie
- 21 Nov 2014 09:37
- 50886 of 81564
Makes you wonder how much of this bill from Brussels is a direct consequence of MP's overstating our country's position, growth and GDP in their obsession to report growth!!
MaxK
- 21 Nov 2014 09:41
- 50887 of 81564
Rochester and Strood by-election full results
Mark Reckless (UKIP) 16,867 (42.10%)
Kelly Tolhurst (Conservative) 13,947 (34.81%)
Naushabah Khan (Labour) 6,713 (16.76%)
Clive Gregory (Green) 1,692 (4.22%)
Geoff Juby (Lib Dem) 349 (0.87%)
Hairy Knorm Davidson (Official Monster Raving Loony Party) 151 (0.38%)
Stephen Goldsbrough (Ind) 69 (0.17%)
Nick Long (People Before Profit) 69 (0.17%)
Jayda Fransen (Britain First) 56 (0.14%)
Mike Barker (Ind) 54 (0.13%)
Charlotte Rose (Ind) 43 (0.11%)
Dave Osborn (Patriotic Socialist Party) 33 (0.08%)
Christopher Challis (Ind) 22 (0.05%)
TANKER
- 21 Nov 2014 10:01
- 50888 of 81564
camerons family
hestines
hoe
duke of west mins
Charles
queen
cleggs
and several others get millions ever year in land subsides from the eu our money
its corrupt and the torys will never let you vote to leave never its another con
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 10:20
- 50889 of 81564
Hays,
How much did it cost the Torrid party to lose Rochester.
These are the same group of boyos who promise economic austerity for the future due to their failed policies.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-30142601
Public borrowing at £7.7bn in October
Government borrowing fell to £7.7bn in October, official figures show, down £0.2bn from a year earlier.
Between April and October, government borrowing was £64.1bn, an increase of £3.7bn from the same period last year.
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 10:30
- 50890 of 81564
I know I am missing something, but what the devil is the fuss over:
It is factual.
I am getting fed up with the pussyfooting about that the leaders of the main parties are performing.
A little more honesty and less media fright would improve opinion of politics.
What a stinking period of politics, when main parties are frighten of a rabble rousing spiv, leading a rabble or mob without any real feasible policies other than being "Little Englanders".
I would expect Nigel to appear wearing an eye patch and a cocked hat and a hook, if it gave him a larger pint and a mob paying for it!
MaxK
- 21 Nov 2014 10:36
- 50891 of 81564
Bloody hell Fred, you don't half talk some shite!
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 10:38
- 50892 of 81564
Was John Bercow initiating Reckless into a lodge of swearing him in to the HP?
Have a look at their handshake.
Haystack
- 21 Nov 2014 10:40
- 50893 of 81564
Not that good a result for UKIP after all. They were only 7% ahead of the Conservatives. They were 20% ahead then 14%, 12% and ended up only 7% ahead. UKIP did not manage the percentage that the Conservatives got when they won the seat. That should be easy to overturn at the GE. It is Labour that should be worried. They had thought that they were immune from UKIP. That is clearly not the case.
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 10:40
- 50894 of 81564
Max,
You should know, you seem and expert at it!
Mind you do seem affiliated to the right party.
Haystack
- 21 Nov 2014 10:44
- 50895 of 81564
Conservatives lead at 1
Latest YouGov / The Sun results 20th November -
Con 34%, Lab 33%, LD 7%, UKIP 15%;
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 10:50
- 50896 of 81564
Hays,
What was the tory majority at the G/E.
How many and what % of the votes have they declined to.
Suggest you pop down to party Central Office and ask Grant for you next spiel.
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 11:04
- 50897 of 81564
Wavy Dave is alright now.
His mate Andy is out of prison.
Andy will be able to advise him again.
Fred1new
- 21 Nov 2014 11:04
- 50898 of 81564
Wavy Dave is alright now.
His mate Andy is out of prison.
Andy will be able to advise him again.
TANKER
- 21 Nov 2014 11:04
- 50899 of 81564
hays the cons had a 10000 majority now lost the seat by 3000
the voters are fade up with the liars in gov immigration is destroying the uk
the working classes are being pushed in to the gutter .immigrants have come here and fcuked up services which suit the cons so they can sell off the nhs to their cronies
taking the public as fools . as a life long tory I am now ashamed of the party of liars and crooks . that is all they are liars and crooks
Haystack
- 21 Nov 2014 11:10
- 50900 of 81564
It was not a normal election. The incumbent MP was standing and picked up votes because of it. UKIP picked up votes in equal measure from the other three parties making it look like a protest vote.
doodlebug4
- 21 Nov 2014 11:11
- 50901 of 81564
By Fraser Nelson
6:10AM GMT 21 Nov 2014
The general election will more of an ugly baby contest than a political beauty pageant
Three years ago, all main Westminster parties believed that they’d be in power after the next election. It was not entirely delusional: the opinion polls were tight and any sort of coalition seemed possible. Now, that optimism has been supplanted by fear and Parliament feels like death’s waiting room. The parties now all think they are about to lose – and this time, they’re probably right.
The Conservatives are today mourning the loss of a second constituency to Ukip. There are no mitigating factors in their defeat. Unlike Clacton, which Tory strategists gave up on apparently on account of its having too many old and poor people, David Cameron did his utmost to keep Rochester and Strood. “We are coming for you,” the Prime Minister told Ukip, in an interview with this newspaper, “and we are going to throw everything we can at you.” He did, yet Mark Reckless still easily won the seat for Ukip taking four in every ten votes cast yesterday. What does this say about the Tory election-winning machine?
ADVERTISEMENT
Labour has arguably more cause for despair; it held Rochester until 2010 and a party on the way back to power ought to be taking such seats back. When Gordon Brown called the last general election, his first visit was to a Morrisons supermarket there – to make the point that this was precisely the type of southern marginal constituency Labour needed to win the general election. Yet last night, it finished a distant third. The highlight of its campaign came when one of its wealthier frontbenchers, Emily Thornberry, tweeted a picture of a Rochester house with three England flags flying outside and a white van parked in the drive. It was as if she wanted to say: eew! She has now resigned.
The Liberal Democrats have once again been reduced to a fringe party, taking just under 1 per cent of the vote last night. This fits a trend: Nick Clegg has now lost almost three quarters of his party’s original supporters – a record surpassed only by Clement Davies, who oversaw the collapse of the old Liberal Party in the late Fifties. Long ago overtaken by Ukip in the polls, the Lib Dems are now fighting to stay ahead of the Greens. Clegg will now fight the next election in the foetal position.
Nigel Farage last night declared that Ukip’s victory in Rochester means that it can win anywhere – but he does not run a party of government. It is a thorn in the side of parties of government – a very effective thorn, and one that has drawn blood from all the leaders. But the problem for Britain is that one of the bleeding men will be our prime minister after the next election, and it will be a sorry sight.
It will come as no comfort to David Cameron, but this is part of a trend sweeping the continent. Ukip belongs to a populist backlash that is terrorising politicians in France, Greece, Italy and Spain – and in each of these countries, the problem is the same. The established political parties are reviled and the insurgent parties are in the ascendant. From Helsinki to Thessaloniki, this is being shrugged off with the same response: that these crazy parties may throw stones, but they’ll never govern. This is perhaps true, but they can stop other people governing – as Britain may soon come to find out.
Take Sweden, where one of David Cameron’s main allies – Fredrik Reinfeldt – was defenestrated a few weeks ago. He started off as a radical reformer, but took a safety-first approach as the election drew closer (a strategy, alas, now being followed by the British Conservatives). The result was as you’d expect: Swedish voters struggled to see what conservatives would do with another term in office. They didn’t turn to the official opposition but, instead, the protest parties – the mainly anti-immigration party and feminists.
As a result, no one won Sweden’s election. But someone had to form a government, so the Social Democrats, fresh from the second-worst election result in their history, had to put together a coalition. Today, not even the new prime minister seems to know what his government is for, apart from accepting the wilder demands of the fringe parties on whose support he now depends to survive in parliament. Sweden is, in effect, governed by a coalition of losers – and we ought not to laugh because, this time next year, we could be too.
The bookmakers, who are often more informative than pollsters, now argue that no one will succeed. That is to say, the shortest odds are now on us having a prime minister too unpopular to command a majority and too toxic to find a formal coalition partner. The lamentable lack of progress on spending reform means that the next government must implement more cuts than have been made so far – but far more painful ones, given that the easiest savings have been already made. The surviving Lib Dems would probably conclude that it is wiser for their party to sit this one out.
Ordinarily, a prime minister unable to form a majority would call a fresh election and seek a new mandate. But it isn’t an option for Cameron, since he unwisely passed the Fixed-Term Parliaments Act. This has legislated for an election in May 2020, and an earlier one can only be called with the agreement of both Labour and the Tories. Which is unlikely, given that a date that suits one party will not suit the other. What was intended as glue to bind together the coalition may become a vice, keeping a minority prime minister in its grip for five agonising years.
It might be survivable for Cameron, thanks to a fresh revolution stirring in Scotland. Nicola Sturgeon is currently enjoying the most successful debut of any political leader in living memory, taking support for her Scottish National Party to historic highs. Alex Salmond emerged from the referendum campaign having more than trebled party membership. He lost the war, but Sturgeon has won the peace, having translated 45 per cent support for independence into 45 per cent support for her SNP. If she keeps this up, then Scottish Labour will be put to the claymore at the next election. The latest poll, from Survation, gives the nationalists 50 of Scotland’s 59 seats.
On a point of principle, the SNP don’t vote on matters that don’t directly affect Scotland – which means health, education, transport and the other areas of deepest contention. So Cameron might just be able to get by, with the ad hoc support of some Northern Irish unionists, Liberal Democrats and perhaps the Greens. The big tasks – health and welfare reform – don’t need legislation. And he would likely find the votes he needs to cling on power, because he would be doing a job that no sane party would want to take over.
The scale of the cuts to come is often forgotten, but remains staggering. Even now you could disband the military, open every prison, fire every diplomat and every police officer, cancel all international aid – and still not be able to balance the books. To crunch spending with a majority in Parliament would be tough; to do it without any claim to a popular mandate would be far tougher. And were Ed Miliband to hobble his way into Downing Street, lacking the support of his own front bench let alone his own party, the agony would be even greater.
Today’s result in Rochester is a reminder the next general election will more of an ugly baby contest than a political beauty pageant. The election campaign that starts in just over four months’ time ought to have been a quest for a winner – now, it looks like it will be a battle of the losers. For a country in need of strong political leadership, it’s a depressing sight.
The Telegraph
TANKER
- 21 Nov 2014 11:20
- 50902 of 81564
hay load of bollocks my self my family my hundreds of close friends ever one at the club are conservatives but not any more we are ashamed of the scum
are we protest voters crap we are sick of the scum in power
TANKER
- 21 Nov 2014 11:22
- 50903 of 81564
the country is run now by crooks and liars the public are sick of the scum
Haystack
- 21 Nov 2014 11:25
- 50904 of 81564
The current government is doing an excellent job and will do an even better job after the GE, when the Conservatives have a clear majority .