Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Rubbish, not that it will happen, all Labour have to do is ask the Unions for the funds and its a good un.

DB4.

You misjudge the SNP.

With the lying of the present tory incumbents the SNP couldn't put up with the stench.

Also, it ain't as simple as give us "devolution" and we will keep you in government.

Any coalition policies, whatever Cameron and fellow loonies think, any policies, laws changing in England (UK) will effect Scotland. Any attempt at continuing what is hidden under term austerity and Tax reform or further movement to the right will fail to pass.

In other words Cameron will be more of an eunuch than he already is.

I suppose they could get him to wear a kilt.

UUUUGH

Fred I have Doodlebug filtered surely hes not saying the SNP would form a coalition with the Tories? surely not.

Hes as daft as a brush if he thinks Sturgeon would get in bed with devious dave.

Fred, I'm a Scot, I lived for 30 years in Scotland before I moved down South and I understand the Scottish mentality. Politics is a nasty, corrupt business and that fact applies to all the parties. SNP will do a deal with the devil if necessary to achieve their objectives.

Fred is he saying the SNP will do a deal with Devious Dave? Salmond as already (last weekend/sunday politics) ruled that out, but he didnt rule out a coalition with labour.

If you believe a word Salmond says then you are even more stupid than I thought gf and it wasn't last weekend he said that, it was about three weeks ago on the Andrew Marr show.

DB4.

We will see.

But if I was to back Salmond, or Sturgeon word against Cameron's I would back the former pair's.

=========

Tell me who is in the charge of the Tory's smear office. Lynton Crosby, the editor of the Sun or Grant Shapps?

Or do you have to ask the tory errand boy Hays or even the hairy one's!

=====

Good to know that Gove is so happy with the result and is going to walk down to the pub for a drink.

Hazyone,

Back to PCO.

You are similar to DB4 at writing rubbish.

But a good devoted representative of your dear leader.
========


PM.

The office is not established by any constitution or law but exists only by long-established convention, which stipulates that the monarch must appoint as prime minister the person most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons; this individual is typically the leader of the political party or coalition of parties that holds the largest number of seats in that chamber.

============

Also, check your facts on Vote of No confidence procedure.

You are in the right party!

no mention of where the money is coming from...


“I would give a very clear power to the Scottish Parliament that it would be able to top up benefits if it thought in the interests of reducing poverty and injustice in this country that it was necessary to do so.”

goldfinger

Wouldnt have the slimey deceptive creep Fred.

I thought Fred was a friend of yours , mind you he is a bit slimy

Grand theft auto, you pay for it, but have no right to use it...good ol Boris




Boris's £60m 'garden bridge' will have no public right of way, no protests and no cycling



The bridge is to close to Londoners late at night once tourist demand has subsided




Jon Stone

Thursday 20 November 2014


The Mayor of London’s planned £60m “garden bridge” over the River Thames in London will have no legal public right of way, it has been announced.



The bridge, likely to be a popular tourist attraction, will be privately managed by a trust and large groups will be asked to call ahead before visiting due to its limited capacity.

Protests and cycling will be banned on the new bridge, which will be closed at midnight when views over the Thames are at their most dramatic and the tourist crowds have dispersed.

The bridge's owner is also exploring the possibility of holding "a limited number" of private events on it, when it could be closed to the public.

£30m of the money for the attraction is coming out of London’s squeezed transport budget, despite Transport for London announcing yet another increase in fares set to come into force next year.

Central government is contributing another £30m for the bridge, which has high-profile celebrity backers including actress Joanna Lumley.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boriss-60m-garden-bridge-will-have-no-public-right-of-way-no-protesting-and-no-cycling-9872176.html

What a slimey creep!

http://order-order.com/2014/11/21/miliband-i-feel-respect-when-i-see-a-white-van/

Sky: “What goes through your mind when you see a white van outside a house?”

EM: “What goes through my mind is respect.

LOL! He'll be saying a tear comes to his eye every time he passes a house flying The England flag next. Gobshite!

I wonder what thoughts go through Call Me's mind when he see's a white van outside the door?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4

Milllibum really is a secret weapon of mass destruction.


Say thanks to the Unions brothers!

http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2014/11/21/ed-miliband-lost-more-than-a-by-election-last-night/

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/11/thanks-to-emily-thornberrys-resignation-the-biggest-losers-from-rochester-were-labour/

"aldwickk - 21 Nov 2014 20:07 - 50963 of 50970"

.. A MAM BB troll appears again.

What is your definition of a troll Stan?

Michael Collins


Friday 21 November 2014


Rochester by-election: Forget Emily Thornberry, Labour long since betrayed the working class



The party has simply failed to address concerns among the multitude



Fat old bag



What is striking about the Emily Thornberry affair is not that a Labour minister has “shown contempt for the working class”, as has been suggested, but that this should be a surprise.



This contempt wasn’t a clause in the party’s constitution, but increasingly it came close to being a policy within the past fifty years - finally becoming official in the 1990s when the Labour government embraced an open-door approach to immigration, fully aware that it would be opposed by the masses. And so - it didn’t tell them. It kept the news within its ranks in the hallowed halls of Westminster, and at north London dinner parties far from the postcodes where white vans are parked and the flag of St George flies. Well, it certainly smelt like contempt.

Part of the Labour party story - beyond the fleeting triumphs and the false dawns - has been that of championing an image of the working class, while showing contempt for the working class that fails to fit this image. Way back, this was anyone who wanted to own their own home, run their own business, watch ITV, send their kids to grammar school, or live next door to people they felt they had something in common with. This changed over time, thankfully. The party realised that the multitude didn’t exist in some folksy, prelapsarian, mythical north somewhere in the 1930s.




More: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/rochester-byelection-forget-emily-thornberry-labour-long-since-betrayed-the-working-class-9876518.html