Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Hazyone,

Back to PCO.

You are similar to DB4 at writing rubbish.

But a good devoted representative of your dear leader.
========


PM.

The office is not established by any constitution or law but exists only by long-established convention, which stipulates that the monarch must appoint as prime minister the person most likely to command the confidence of the House of Commons; this individual is typically the leader of the political party or coalition of parties that holds the largest number of seats in that chamber.

============

Also, check your facts on Vote of No confidence procedure.

You are in the right party!

no mention of where the money is coming from...


“I would give a very clear power to the Scottish Parliament that it would be able to top up benefits if it thought in the interests of reducing poverty and injustice in this country that it was necessary to do so.”

goldfinger

Wouldnt have the slimey deceptive creep Fred.

I thought Fred was a friend of yours , mind you he is a bit slimy

Grand theft auto, you pay for it, but have no right to use it...good ol Boris




Boris's £60m 'garden bridge' will have no public right of way, no protests and no cycling



The bridge is to close to Londoners late at night once tourist demand has subsided




Jon Stone

Thursday 20 November 2014


The Mayor of London’s planned £60m “garden bridge” over the River Thames in London will have no legal public right of way, it has been announced.



The bridge, likely to be a popular tourist attraction, will be privately managed by a trust and large groups will be asked to call ahead before visiting due to its limited capacity.

Protests and cycling will be banned on the new bridge, which will be closed at midnight when views over the Thames are at their most dramatic and the tourist crowds have dispersed.

The bridge's owner is also exploring the possibility of holding "a limited number" of private events on it, when it could be closed to the public.

£30m of the money for the attraction is coming out of London’s squeezed transport budget, despite Transport for London announcing yet another increase in fares set to come into force next year.

Central government is contributing another £30m for the bridge, which has high-profile celebrity backers including actress Joanna Lumley.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boriss-60m-garden-bridge-will-have-no-public-right-of-way-no-protesting-and-no-cycling-9872176.html

What a slimey creep!

http://order-order.com/2014/11/21/miliband-i-feel-respect-when-i-see-a-white-van/

Sky: “What goes through your mind when you see a white van outside a house?”

EM: “What goes through my mind is respect.

LOL! He'll be saying a tear comes to his eye every time he passes a house flying The England flag next. Gobshite!

I wonder what thoughts go through Call Me's mind when he see's a white van outside the door?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnzHtm1jhL4

Milllibum really is a secret weapon of mass destruction.


Say thanks to the Unions brothers!

http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2014/11/21/ed-miliband-lost-more-than-a-by-election-last-night/

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/11/thanks-to-emily-thornberrys-resignation-the-biggest-losers-from-rochester-were-labour/

"aldwickk - 21 Nov 2014 20:07 - 50963 of 50970"

.. A MAM BB troll appears again.

What is your definition of a troll Stan?

Michael Collins


Friday 21 November 2014


Rochester by-election: Forget Emily Thornberry, Labour long since betrayed the working class



The party has simply failed to address concerns among the multitude



Fat old bag



What is striking about the Emily Thornberry affair is not that a Labour minister has “shown contempt for the working class”, as has been suggested, but that this should be a surprise.



This contempt wasn’t a clause in the party’s constitution, but increasingly it came close to being a policy within the past fifty years - finally becoming official in the 1990s when the Labour government embraced an open-door approach to immigration, fully aware that it would be opposed by the masses. And so - it didn’t tell them. It kept the news within its ranks in the hallowed halls of Westminster, and at north London dinner parties far from the postcodes where white vans are parked and the flag of St George flies. Well, it certainly smelt like contempt.

Part of the Labour party story - beyond the fleeting triumphs and the false dawns - has been that of championing an image of the working class, while showing contempt for the working class that fails to fit this image. Way back, this was anyone who wanted to own their own home, run their own business, watch ITV, send their kids to grammar school, or live next door to people they felt they had something in common with. This changed over time, thankfully. The party realised that the multitude didn’t exist in some folksy, prelapsarian, mythical north somewhere in the 1930s.




More: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/rochester-byelection-forget-emily-thornberry-labour-long-since-betrayed-the-working-class-9876518.html

Miliband's self destruct button strikes again. Clearly he can't handle the pressure now, so what is he going to be like in the few weeks before the GE?!

aldwickk DB.

LOL

This definition doesn't sound like aldwickk to me Stan!

"Where Do You Find Internet Trolls?

Ans: internet trolls are sadly common. They can be found wherever online users interact with each other. Trolls will abuse others in news blogs, political discussion forums, hobbyist communities online, Facebook pages, torrent search engine conversations, and in online game chat. Trolls have become very common in news sites. Many online news sources now avoid using open comment features because so many internet trolls will use this venue to post abusive comments as responses to news articles.

How Exactly Do Internet Trolls Abuse Others?

Ans: internet trolls seek to be disruptive and hurtful by using any of the following techniques:
Trolls will post abusive and hurtful comments directed at a specific person (aka "flaming" another person)
Trolls will incite broad arguments and provoke angry responses by making controversial statements. (e.g. racism, religious intolerance, bigoted or elitist views, mysogyny, extreme political views)
Trolls will narcissistically dominate conversations, trying to make themselves the center of attention. (e.g. nonstop comments about themselves and their accomplishments; repeated self-centered statements and bragging)
Trolls will start many off-topic threads, seeking to derail users from the focus of an online community.


Why Do People Enjoy Being Internet Trolls?

Ans: it is a kind of power rush or ego trip to be a troll. Being online is a place that is largely free of perceived consequences... an insecure person can get a sense of power online, without ever having to face someone directly. With the Internet being a world of imagination and fantasy for some, cowardly users can forge an alter ego for themselves, and act out their feelings of anger and inadequacy. It's sad and unfortunate that our advanced communications also brings out the darker side of many people. "

By Peter Dominiczak, Steven Swinford, Christopher Hope and Matthew Holehouse
10:00PM GMT 21 Nov 2014
Labour in chaos following the sacking of Emily Thornberry as Ukip says it will replace them as the party of the working class

Ed Miliband is facing further turmoil in the wake of the Rochester and Strood by-election as Ukip claimed it was now poised to replace Labour as the party of the working class.

Labour was in crisis after Mr Miliband was forced to sack Emily Thornberry from his shadow cabinet over a "contemptuous" tweet she posted of a house draped in England flags with a white van in the driveway while campaigning in Kent.

Mr Miliband had been hoping that the Rochester by-election would mark a change in his fortunes and turn the focus on to David Cameron and the threat faced to the Tories by Nigel Farage and Ukip.

However, the party’s division over the handling of Miss Thornberry’s sacking placed spotlight once again on Mr Miliband’s leadership and the direction of his party and allowed Mr Cameron to accuse the Labour leader of "sneering" at Britain’s working classes.

One senior Labour MP warned that the party was losing touch with its traditional voters, saying "the leadership are talking Swahili when ordinary people in ordinary jobs are talking English".

Douglas Carswell, who last month became Ukip’s first MP, said the row showed that the "Labour leadership despises ordinary folk" and is "no longer in touch with working people".

Ukip will displace Labour as the party of working class voters because it is "prepared to take on the vested interests in the economy, politics and Brussels", Mr Carswell said.

Mark Reckless, a former Tory, won Thursday’s by-election for Ukip with 16,867 votes - 42 per cent of the total cast.

The Tories were in second place with 13,947 – 35 per cent – of the vote despite Mr Cameron having previously pledged to "throw the kitchen sink" at the campaign in a bid to defeat Mr Reckless.

Labour received just 17 per cent of the vote and the Lib Dems were humiliated after being overtaken by the Green Party and coming fifth with just 0.1 per cent.

Mr Farage said that the result showed that his party was now capable of winning anywhere in the country and predicted that more MPs are likely to defect to his party.

However, pollsters and senior Conservatives predicted that the Tories would win the seat in May as Ukip’s margin of victory was lower than had been expected.

There was intense speculation that Philip Hollobone, the Tory MP for Kettering, could be planning to join Ukip after he introduced Mr Reckless as he was sworn into the House of Commons and then voted alongside him against the Government in a vote about the NHS.

However, it was Mr Miliband and Labour who faced the biggest questions after the by-election following the furore caused by Miss Thornberry.

Miss Thornberry was sacked as shadow attorney general shortly after 10pm on Thursday after prompting anger when she posted a picture of the house and captioned it "Image from Rochester".

The Prime Minister accused Labour of "sneering" at patriotic British working people and Dan Ware, the owner of the house, described her as a "snob".

Mr Miliband was said by senior sources to be "f***ing furious" at Miss Thornberry. Labour sources likened the gaffe to the one made by Gordon Brown in 2010 when he was overheard labelling Gillian Duffy a “bigoted woman” while campaigning.

However, senior Labour MPs criticised his handling of the situation.

Graham Stringer, the Labour MP for Blackley and Broughton, said that the situation highlighted that there are not enough "authentic working class voices in the shadow cabinet".

"There aren’t enough authentic working class voices in the shadow cabinet or the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] as a whole," he said.

"There are far too many people who have started off as MPs assistants and ministerial bag carriers who have made it up the ranks. The PLP needs a much wider base, people who have worked in supermarkets and on building sites.

"It makes it more difficult for the labour party to understand and communicate with the range of working people in this country."

He added: "It’s the language that’s used by some of the leadership that’s not connecting with the problems that our voters and potential voters. Some in the leadership are talking Swahili when ordinary people in ordinary jobs are talking English.

"This is a huge catastrophe for the Conservatives, they have lost two people, they have lost a seat that they have won by 10,000 and it has turned into a story about a sneering Labour MP."

Austin Mitchell, MP for Great Grimsby, said Miss Thornberry’s sacking was "totally unnecessary".

"The leader has bigger things to worry about. He shouldn’t have his acolytes running about getting people to resign over trivia," he said.

Alan Johnson, who in recent weeks has been the subject of feverish leadership speculation, said he did not think it was a "resignation scandal".

And Ian Austin, Labour MP for Dudley North, said: "It illustrates what lots of people round the country suspect the country is run by an out of touch metropolitan elite that doesn’t understand anything about their lives, doesn’t understand their concerns and sneer at them."

A senior Labour source said: "Everybody said that Rochester would be the turning point and suddenly everyone would be focusing on Cameron and his problems with Ukip. But despite the Tories losing to Farage, everybody is still talking about Ed Miliband and Emily Thornberry. It’s a disaster.

The Telegraph

The leadership of the Labour party have no connection with working people. It is about time that the public realised it. It has become a party run by detached, intellectuals. They live in Islington and Hampstead. Examples have been Foot, Blair, Miliband, Glenda Jackson, Manselson and plenty of others. It was those intellectuals that made it easy for immigrants to come here because they thought it would increase the Labour vote.