someuwin
- 09 Oct 2005 21:40
2517GEORGE
- 14 Sep 2006 17:16
- 51 of 71
Excellent day whatever the reason, my Shares mag didn't arrive this morning, maybe they got mentioned there.
2517
2517GEORGE
- 15 Sep 2006 09:33
- 52 of 71
Follow through volume again this morning.
2517
2517GEORGE
- 15 Sep 2006 15:53
- 53 of 71
Excellent day thus far must be news coming maybe re Nestle trials, but whatever it's a blue day. Nothing in my late delivered Shares mag. mmm
2517
2517GEORGE
- 18 Sep 2006 17:05
- 54 of 71
Down on the day but what an afternoon, hopefully looking forward to some strength tomorrow.
2517
RAS
- 02 Mar 2007 15:54
- 55 of 71
Just added a load of these to my portfolio. Tipped in Moneyweek as tip of the month apparently. Says has potential to be another Tetra-pack !!
RAS
- 05 Mar 2007 12:33
- 56 of 71
Great timing. Looking very good for at least 9-10p short-term.
RAS
- 25 May 2007 10:03
- 57 of 71
Looking good for the next move up.
relishing
- 07 Apr 2008 11:23
- 58 of 71
Bouncing off the bottom now.
relishing
- 09 Apr 2008 10:32
- 59 of 71
Excellent news for TIME.
relishing
- 15 Apr 2008 11:03
- 61 of 71
Yes, looks like there are few buyers out there for TIME at the moment, probably to do with the sector being out of fashion, especially jam-tomorrow. The market cap is still not small enough to attract 'value buyers' en masse.
At some point this will change though.
relishing
- 16 Apr 2008 11:24
- 62 of 71
Good bounce this morning though..
relishing
- 17 Apr 2008 12:53
- 63 of 71
OUCH!
Probably an over-reaction though.
maggiebt4
- 17 Apr 2008 14:04
- 64 of 71
This company seems to spend it's time! bouncing and going no where! Still patience is a virtue
hangon
- 06 May 2008 14:52
- 65 of 71
Raises 1.1 million via "subscription" at 2.16 pence - let's hope this money will be well-spent, rather than fund debt, directors and so on.
It adds about 17% to the number of shares.
So the dilution-effect is small - and not as bad as the effects of recent share-price falls . . . . . from about 8.5p in 12 months.
boldtrader
- 06 May 2008 16:33
- 66 of 71
Could this therefore mean that signed contracts are near to hand. cheers.
halifax
- 06 May 2008 18:56
- 67 of 71
Even TW has apparently given up on this one.
stockdog
- 07 May 2008 06:39
- 68 of 71
Puzzled by the expression "subscription by the Company" rather than by a third party. Where have these shares been placed? Any enlightenment out there? TIA
hangon
- 24 Jun 2008 18:28
- 69 of 71
2.75p today!
Stockdog...I think this is company speak for "we didn't invite shareholders" - - and really does it matter? - the sp fall is dramatic since the product is unable to command a huge price, being a small part of packing-value. This is not the route to loot and the sp which was 7-8p recently has dropped as a result.
I dislike companies with single-products, so they better find more ideas - - - rather a snag as their name defines the product.
EDIT(13Nov08)- sp 1.38 pence - ooo-er. However, they have received an order for cosmetic products, where the time after opening is usually shown in print on the lid. Frankly I can't see this (strip) as an Advantage the customer will pay for, so it must be absorbed by the manufacturer. It's not as though the Ladies' faces aren't already tired and warty, so almost any face-cream is bound to be an improvement, even if it's a youthful six-months old. Ho-Ho.
MM's pushed sp up 20% speculatively, on total volume-worth 1k..
EDIT.(20Nov08)- Massive fall today, even beating Woolworth! Arrgh.
isomorph
- 22 Sep 2009 15:57
- 70 of 71
At long last.
Timestrip products now on trial in NHS and saved 4k in 4 weeks, by allowing temp sensative drugs to return to stock instead of disposal.